Alena Denisova
ABSTRACT
Power-ups are a type of game reward that allow the player to customise their experience by altering gameplay for a short period of time. Despite the wide use of power-ups in video games, little is known about their effect on gaming experiences. To explore this, we conducted an experimental study that compares the experiences of players depending on their exposure to power-ups in a recreational video game. The results show that players who collected power-ups felt significantly more immersed in the game, experienced more autonomy, but did not feel more competent or challenged than those who played the game without these collectables. Interestingly, a similar effect was observed for those players who picked up 'placebo' power-ups, despite the items having no effect on the gameplay. We provide a discussion of these results and their implications both for games user researchers and game designers.
Supplemental Material
- Ernest Adams. 2014. Fundamentals of game design. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Max Birk and Regan L Mandryk. 2013. Control your game-self: effects of controller type on enjoyment, motivation, and personality in game. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 685--694. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470752Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbaros Bostan and Sertaç Ö güt. 2009. Game challenges and difficulty levels: lessons learned from RPGs. In International simulation and gaming association conference.Google Scholar
- Emily Brown and Paul Cairns. 2004. A grounded investigation of game immersion. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1297--1300. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/985921.986048Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben Cowley, Darryl Charles, Michaela Black, and Ray Hickey. 2008. Toward an Understanding of Flow in Video Games. Entertainment Computing 6, 2, Article 20 (July 2008), 27 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1371216.1371223Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edward L Deci, Richard Koestner, and Richard M Ryan. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin 125, 6 (1999), 627. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033--2909.125.6.627Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 1985. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality 19, 2 (1985), 109--134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092--6566(85)90023--6Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alena Denisova and Paul Cairns. 2015a. First person vs. third person perspective in digital games: do player preferences affect immersion?. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 145--148. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702256Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alena Denisova and Paul Cairns. 2015b. The placebo effect in digital games: Phantom perception of adaptive artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 23--33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793109Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alena Denisova and Paul Cairns. 2019. Player experience and deceptive expectations of difficulty adaptation in digital games. Entertainment Computing 29 (2019), 56--68. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2018.12.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alena Denisova, Paul Cairns, Christian Guckelsberger, and David Zendle. 2019. Measuring Perceived Challenge in Digital Games: Development and Validation of the Challenge Originating from Recent Gameplay Interaction Scale (CORGIS). To appear in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2019).Google Scholar
- Alena Denisova, A Imran Nordin, and Paul Cairns. 2016. The convergence of player experience questionnaires. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 33--37. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968095Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luís Duarte and Luís Carriço. 2012. Power me Up!: an interactive and physiological perspective on videogames' temporary bonus rewards. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fun and Games. ACM, 55--63. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2367616.2367623Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luís Duarte and Luis Carriço. 2013. The cake can be a lie: placebos as persuasive videogame elements. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1113--1118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468555Google ScholarDigital Library
- Catherine O Fritz, Peter E Morris, and Jennifer J Richler. 2012. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of experimental psychology: General 141, 1 (2012), 2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024338Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tracy Fullerton. 2014. Game design workshop: a playcentric approach to creating innovative games. AK Peters/CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Ben Goldacre. 2010. Bad science: Quacks, hacks, and big pharma flacks. McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
- Kieran Hicks, Kathrin Gerling, Graham Richardson, Tom Pike, Oliver Burman, and Patrick Dickinson. 2019. Understanding the Effects of Gamification and Juiciness on Players. IEEE (2019).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ioanna Iacovides, Anna Cox, Richard Kennedy, Paul Cairns, and Charlene Jennett. 2015. Removing the HUD: the impact of non-diegetic game elements and expertise on player involvement. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 13--22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793120Google ScholarDigital Library
- Charlene Jennett, Anna L Cox, Paul Cairns, Samira Dhoparee, Andrew Epps, Tim Tijs, and Alison Walton. 2008. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International journal of human-computer studies 66, 9 (2008), 641--661. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Johnson, Madison Klarkowski, Kellie Vella, Cody Phillips, Mitchell McEwan, and Christopher N Watling. 2018. Greater rewards in videogames lead to more presence, enjoyment and effort. Computers in Human Behavior 87 (2018), 66--74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.025Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jesper Juul. 2010. A casual revolution: Reinventing video games and their players. MIT press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mallory Ketcheson, Zi Ye, and TC Graham. 2015. Designing for exertion: how heart-rate power-ups increase physical activity in exergames. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 79--89. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793122Google ScholarDigital Library
- Filip Lange-Nielsen. 2011. The Power-up Experience: A study of Power-ups in Games and their Effect on Player Experience. In DiGRA Conference.Google Scholar
- Alison McMahan. 2013. Immersion, engagement, and presence: A method for analyzing 3-D video games. In The video game theory reader. Routledge, 89--108.Google Scholar
- Cody Phillips, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Leanne Hides, and Madison Klarkowski. 2015. Redefining videogame reward types. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction. ACM, 83--91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838782Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology 25, 1 (2000), 54--67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard M Ryan, C Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and emotion 30, 4 (2006), 344--360. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006--9051--8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jesse Schell. 2014. One Kind of Experience is the Story. In The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses. AK Peters/CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Carmen R Wilson VanVoorhis and Betsy L Morgan. 2007. Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology 3, 2 (2007), 43--50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Power-Ups in Digital Games: The Rewarding Effect of Phantom Game Elements on Player Experience
Recommendations
The interplay between immersion and appeal in video games
A 2í 2 study on immersion and appeal of video games is presented.Immersion and appeal are found to be highly related.Immersion is found to be unaffected by playing experience.Appeal is found to be affected both by game played and playing experience. ...
Relevance and Immersion in Digital Games: Content and Personal Factors
CHIuXiD '17: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction and User Experience in IndonesiaPrevious studies have investigated the effects of diverse game design features on player immersion. The current study investigated the relationship between game content and immersion. When players are immersed in a game, they perceive that they are "...
The Spheres of Player Motivation: Understanding Players of Digital Games
CHI PLAY '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlayUnderstanding player motivations is crucial for the games industry, as it empowers developers to improve how their games are designed. Each player is different and possesses their own motivations to play. Motivations can vary greatly, ranging from ...
Comments