skip to main content
10.1145/3308561.3353780acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Perception and Adoption of Mobile Accessibility Features by Older Adults Experiencing Ability Changes

Published:24 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

To investigate how older adults perceive ability changes (e.g., sensory, physical, cognitive) and how attitudes toward those changes affect perception and adoption of built-in mobile accessibility features (such as those found on Apple iOS and Google Android smartphones and tablets), we conducted an interview study with 14 older adults and six of their family members. Accessibility features were difficult for participants to find and configure, which were issues compounded by a reluctance to use trial-and-error. At 4-6 weeks after the interview, however, some participants had adopted new accessibility features that we had showed them, suggesting a willingness to adopt once features are made visible. The older adults who did already use accessibility features had experienced a disability earlier in life, suggesting that those experiencing progressive ability changes later in life might not be as aware of accessibility features, or might not have the know-how to adapt technologies to their changing needs. Our findings provide support for creating technologies that can detect older adults' abilities and recommend or enact interface changes to match.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Faranak Aminzadeh and Nancy Edwards. 1998. Exploring seniors' views on the use of assistive devices in fall prevention. Public Health Nursing 15 (4), 297--304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525--1446.1998.tb00353.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Monica Anderson and Andrew Perrin. 2017. Tech adoption climbs among older adults. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/17/technology-use-among-seniors/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lisa Anthony, YooJin Kim, and Leah Findlater. 2013. Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. Proceedings of CHI 2013. New York: ACM Press, 1223--1232. DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 1999. Contextual design. Interactions 6, 32--42. ISBN: 9780080503042Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Aimée K. Bright and Lynne Coventry. 2013. Assistive technology for older adults. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. New York: ACM Press, 1--4. DOI: 10.1145/2504335.2504344Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nancy A. Brooks. 1991. Users' responses to assistive devices for physical disability. Social Science & Medicine 32 (12), 1417--1424. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1831289Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mario Conci, Fabio Pianesi, and Massimo Zancanaro. 2009. Useful, social and enjoyable: Mobile phone adoption by older people. In T. Gross, J. Gulliksen, P. Kotzé, L. Oestreicher, P. Palanque, R.O. Prates, & M. Winckler (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2009. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978--3--642-03655--2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fred D. Davis Jr. 1986. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Leah Findlater, Jon E. Froehlich, Kays Fattal, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Tanya Dastyar. 2013. Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. Proceedings of CHI 2013. New York: ACM Press, 343--346. DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2470703Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rachel Franz, Leah Findlater, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2018. Lost in transition: The importance of conceptualizing aging as a process in accessibility research. In Workshop on "Designing Interactions for the Ageing Populations." CHI 2018. Montreal, 53--58. https://faculty.washington.edu/wobbrock/pubs/chi-18.03.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ann E. Gerike. 1990. On gray hair and oppressed brains. Journal of Women & Aging 2 (2), 35--46. DOI: 10.1300/J074v02n02_05Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Rachael Gooberman-Hill and Shah Ebrahim. 2007. Making decisions about simple interventions: Older people's use of walking aids. Age and Ageing 36 (5), 569--573. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afm095Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Toshiyuki Hagiya, Toshiharu Horiuchi, and Tomonori Yazaki. 2016. Typing Tutor: Individualized tutoring in text entry for older adults based on input stumble detection. Proceedings of CHI 2016. New York: ACM Press, 733--744. DOI: 10.1145/2858036.2858455Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shaun K. Kane, Chandrika Jayant, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. Freedom to roam: A study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. Proceedings of ASSETS 2009. New York: ACM Press, 115--122. DOI: 10.1145/1639642.1639663Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sri Kurniawan, Murni Mahmud, and Yanuar Nugroho. 2006. A study of the use of mobile phones by older persons. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2006. New York: ACM Press, 989--994. DOI: 10.1145/1125451.1125641Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Chaiwoo Lee and Joseph F. Coughlin. 2014. PERSPECTIVE: Older adults' adoption of technology: An integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32 (5), 747--759. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12176Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Rock Leung, Charlotte Tang, Shathel Haddad, Joanna Mcgrenere, Peter Graf, and Vilia Ingriany. 2012. How older adults learn to use mobile devices. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 4 (3), 1--33. DOI: 10.1145/2399193.2399195Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Aqueasha Martin-Hammond, Abdullah Ali, Catherine Hornback, and Amy K. Hurst. 2015. Understanding design considerations for adaptive user interfaces for accessible pointing with older and younger adults. Proceedings of W4A 2015. New York: ACM Press, 1--10. DOI: 10.1145/2745555.2746645Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kathleen A. Martin, Mark R. Leary, and W. Jack Rejeski. 2000. Self-presentational concerns in older adults: Implications for health and well-being. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 22 (3), 169--179. DOI: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2203_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ronald E. McGaughey, Steven M. Zeltmann, and Mark E. McMurtrey. 2013. Motivations and obstacles to smartphone use by the elderly: Developing a research framework. International Journal of Electronic Finance 7, (3/4), 177--195. DOI: 10.1504/IJEF.2013.058601Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lilian Genaro Motti, Nadine Vigouroux, and Philippe Gorce. 2013. Interaction techniques for older adults using touchscreen devices. Proceedings of IHM 2013 New York: ACM Press, 125--134. DOI: 10.1145/2534903.2534920Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Barbara Barbosa Neves, Rachel L. Franz, Cosmin Munteanu, Ronald Baecker, and Mags Ngo. 2015. "My hand doesn't listen to me!": Adoption and evaluation of a communication technology for the 'oldest old.' Proceedings of CHI 2015. New York: ACM Press, 1593--1602. DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702430Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Alex Olwal, Dimitris Lachanas, and Ermioni Zacharouli. 2011. OldGen: Mobile phone personalization for older adults. Proceedings of CHI 2011. New York: ACM Press, 3393--3396. DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979447Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Michael Quinn Patton. 2001. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN: 0761919716Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yi-Hao Peng, Muh-Tarng Lin, Yi Chen, TzuChuan Chen, Pin Sung Ku, Paul Taele, Chin Guan Lim, and Mike Y. Chen. 2019. PersonalTouch: Improving touchscreen usability by personalizing accessibility settings based on individual user's touchscreen interaction. Proceedings of CHI 2019. New York: ACM Press, 1--11. DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300913Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Maribel Pino, Mélodie Boulay, François Jouen, and Anne-Sophie Rigaud. 2015. "Are we ready for robots that care for us?" Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 7 (141), 1--15. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Anne Marie Piper, Robin Brewer, and Raymundo Cornejo. 2017. Technology learning and use among older adults with late-life vision impairments. Universal Access in the Information Society 16 (3), 699--711. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-016-0500--1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Anne Marie Piper, Ross Campbell, and James D. Hollan. 2010. Exploring the accessibility and appeal of surface computing for older adult health care support. Proceedings of CHI 2010. New York: ACM Press, 907--916. DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J.J. Ray. 1988. Lie scales and the elderly. Personality and Individual Differences 9 (2), 417--418. DOI: 10.1016/0191--8869(88)90106--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Karen Renaud and Judy van Biljon. 2008. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly. In Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries: Riding the Wave of Technology (SAICSIT '08). New York: ACM Press, 210--219. DOI: 10.1145/1456659.1456684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception. Proceedings of CHI 2011. New York: ACM Press, 705--714. DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Marlee M. Spafford, Debbie Laliberte Rudman, Beverly D. Leipert, Lisa Klinger, and Suzanne Huot. 2010. When self-presentation trumps access: why older adults with low vision go without low-vision services. Journal of Applied Gerontology 29 (5), 579--602. DOI: 10.1177/0733464809345494Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Robert Steele, Amanda Lo, Chris Secombe, and Yuk Kuen Wong. 2009. Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78 (12), 788--801. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Christian Stößel, Hartmut Wandke, and Lucienne Blessing. 2010. Gestural interfaces for elderly users: Help or hindrance? In Stefan Kopp and Ipke Wachsmuth (eds.), Gesture in Embodied Communication and Human-Computer Interaction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 269--280. DOI: 10.1007/978--3--642--12553--9_24Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sarit Felicia Anais Szpiro, Shafeka Hashash, Yuhang Zhao, and Shiri Azenkot. 2016. How people with low vision access computing devices. Proceedings of ASSETS 2016. New York: ACM Press, 171--180. DOI: 10.1145/2982142.2982168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425--478. DOI: 10.2307/30036540Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. John Vines, Gary Pritchard, Peter Wright, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2015. An age-old problem: Examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22 (1), 1--27. DOI: 10.1145/2696867Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Chat Wacharamanotham, Jan Hurtmanns, Alexander Mertens, Martin Kronenbuerger, Christopher Schlick, and Jan Borchers. 2011. Evaluating Swabbing: A touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor. Proceedings of CHI 2011. New York: ACM Press, 623--626. DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979031Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kieran Walsh and Aoife Callan. 2011. Perceptions, preferences, and acceptance of information and communication technologies in older-adult community care cettings in Ireland: A case-study and ranked-care program analysis. Ageing International 36 (1), 102--122. DOI: 10.1007/s12126-010--9075-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Shaun K. Kane, and Gregg C. Vanderheiden. 2018. Ability-based design. Communications of the ACM 61 (6), 62--71. DOI: 10.1145/3148051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 3 (3), 1--36. DOI: 10.1145/1952383.1952384Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. 2017. World Population Ageing 2017. New York. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Highlights.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Perception and Adoption of Mobile Accessibility Features by Older Adults Experiencing Ability Changes

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ASSETS '19: Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
          October 2019
          730 pages
          ISBN:9781450366762
          DOI:10.1145/3308561

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 October 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          ASSETS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate41of158submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader