skip to main content
10.1145/2901790.2901868acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Spin: Examining the Role of Engagement, Integration, and Modularity in Supporting Youth Creating Documentation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

While sharing design projects is often seen as an essential component of participating in the maker community, ways in which young people can meaningfully participate have only begun to be supported. In this paper, we contribute an evaluation of Spin, a system for youth to capture and share animations of physical design projects. We describe how educators and students used Spin in 16 different K-12 makerspaces over 6 months, ranging from 2-hour-long workshops to extended 8-week engagements. Through our analysis of over 450 animations created during this timeframe and interviews and surveys with users, we outline the role of engagement, integration, and modularity for making documentation practice relevant and meaningful. We distill these ideas into design principles for creating documentation tools to support young makers.

References

  1. Chris Anderson. 2012. Makers: The new industrial revolution. Crown, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ishac Bertran. 2011. Pas a Pas: A platform for enabling schools to teach educational content using stop motion animation. In Proc. of IDC 2011. ACM Press, 231--233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Stephanie Chang, Anna Keune, Kylie Peppler, and Lisa. Regalia. 2015. Open Portfolios Research Brief Series. (2015). http://makered.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/ Open-Portfolio-Project-Research-Brief-Series_FULL_ final-small.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Pei-Yu Chi, Joyce Liu, Jason Linder, Mira Dontcheva, Wilmot Li, and Bjoern Hartmann. 2013. Democut: generating concise instructional videos for physical demonstrations. In Proc. of UIST 2013. ACM, 141--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sharon Lynn Chu, Francis Quek, and Kumar Sridharamurthy. 2014. Ready... action!: A performative authoring system for children to create animated stories. In Proc. of ACE 2014. ACM, 52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tal Drori and Michal. Rinott. 2007. Pixel materiali: A system for creating and understanding pixel animations. In Proc. of IDC 2007. ACM Press, 157--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brian Gravel. 2009. Science of SAM: Why animation is good for the classroom. Unpublished White Paper. (2009). http://icreatetoeducate.s3.amazonaws.com/pdfs/ ScienceofSAMWP.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Shannon L Halgren, Tony Fernandes, and Deanna Thomas. 1995. Amazing animation: Movie making for kids design briefing. In Proc. of CHI 1995. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 519--525. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Erica Rosenfeld Halverson and Kimberly Sheridan. 2014. The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review 84, 4 (2014), 495--504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Perttu Hämäläinen, Mikko Lindholm, Ari Nykänen, and Johanna Höysniemi. 2004. Animaatiokone: An installation for creating clay animation. In Proc. of CHI 2004. ACM, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sam Jacoby and Leah Buechley. 2013. Drawing the electric: storytelling with conductive ink. In Proc. of IDC 2013. ACM, 265--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Stacey Kuznetsov and Eric Paulos. 2010. Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. In Proc. of NORDCHI 2010. ACM Press, 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Silvia Lindtner, Garnet Hertz, and Paul Dourish. 2014. Emerging sites of HCI innovation: Hackerspaces, hardware startups, incubators. In Proc. of CHI 2014. ACM Press, 439--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lora Oehlberg, Wesley Willett, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2015. Patterns of physical design remixing in online maker communities. In Proc. of CHI 2015. ACM Press, 639--648. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Florian Perteneder, Eva-Maria Grossauer, Yan Xu, and Michael Haller. 2015. Catch-Up 360: Digital Benefits for Physical Artifacts. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 105--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Alison Powell. 2012. Democratizing production through open source knowledge: from open software to open hardware. Media, Culture & Society 34, 6 (2012), 691--708.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hayes Raffie, Cati Vaucelle, Ruibing Wang, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2007. Jabberstamp: Embedding sound and voice in traditional drawings. In Proc. of IDC 2007. ACM, 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Daniela Rosner and Jonathan Bean. 2009. Learning from IKEA hacking: I'm not one to decoupage a tabletop and call it a day. In Proc. of CHI 2009. ACM Press, 419--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Daniela Rosner and Kimiko. Ryokai. 2010. Spyn: Augmenting the creative and communicative potential of craft. In Proc. of CHI 2010. ACM Press, 2407--2416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Joshua G Tanenbaum, Amanda M Williams, Audrey Desjardins, and Karen Tanenbaum. 2013. Democratizing technology: Pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In Proc. of CHI 2013. ACM, 2603--2612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Cristen Torrey, Elizabeth F Churchill, and David W McDonald. 2009. Learning how: The search for craft knowledge on the internet. In Proc. of CHI 2009. ACM, 1371--1380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Cristen Torrey, David W. McDonald, Bill N. Schilit, and Sara Bly. 2007. How-to pages: Informal systems of expertise sharing.. In Proc. of ECSCW 2007. Springer London, 391--410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tiffany Tseng. 2015a. Making make-throughs: Supporting young makers sharing design process. In Proc. of Fablearn 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tiffany. Tseng. 2015b. Spin: A photography turntable system for creating animated documentation. In Proc. of IDC 2015. ACM Press, 422--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tiffany Tseng and Coram. Bryant. 2011. Collaboration through documentation: Automated capturing of tangible constructions to support engineering design. In Proc. of IDC 2011. ACM Press, 118--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tiffany Tseng, Robert Hemsley, and Mitchel Resnick. 2012. Replay: A self-documenting construction kit. In Proc. of IDC 2012. ACM Press, 320--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tiffany Tseng and Mitchel Resnick. 2014. Product versus process: Representing and appropriating DIY projects online. In Proc. of DIS 2014. ACM Press, 425--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Barbara Tversky, Julie Bauer Morrison, and Mireille Betrancourt. 2002. Animation: Can it facilitate? International journal of human-computer studies 57, 4 (2002), 247--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jaime Urquiza-Fuentes and J Ángel Velázquez-Iturbide. 2013. Toward the effective use of educational program animations: The roles of student's engagement and topic complexity. Computers & Education 67 (2013), 178--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ron Wakkary, Markus Lorenz Schilling, Matthew A Dalton, Sabrina Hauser, Audrey Desjardins, Xiao Zhang, and Henry WJ Lin. 2015. Tutorial Authorship and Hybrid Designers: The Joy (and Frustration) of DIY Tutorials. In Proc. of CHI 2015. ACM, 609--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Alex Williams. 2013. Fresh From the Internet's Attic. (13 February 2013). Retrieved Jan. 5, 2016 from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/14/fashion/ common-on-early-internet-gif-files-make-comeback. html?_r=1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Spin: Examining the Role of Engagement, Integration, and Modularity in Supporting Youth Creating Documentation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
      June 2016
      1374 pages
      ISBN:9781450340311
      DOI:10.1145/2901790

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate107of418submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader