skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518908acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning how: the search for craft knowledge on the internet

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Communicating the subtleties of a craft technique, like putting a zipper into a garment or throwing a clay pot, can be challenging even when working side by side. Yet How-To content - including text, images, animations, and videos - is available online for a wide variety of crafts. We interviewed people engaged in various crafts to investigate how online resources contributed to their craft practice. We found that participants sought creative inspiration as well as technical clarification online. In this domain, keyword search can be difficult, so supplemental strategies are used. Participants sought information iteratively, because they often needed to enact their knowledge in order to evaluate it. Our description of people learning how allows us to elaborate existing understandings of information-seeking behavior by considering how search originates and is evaluated in knowledge domains involving physical objects and physical processes.

References

  1. Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E. and Ackerman, M. S. Knowledge sharing and Yahoo Answers: Everyone knows something. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW) (2008), 665--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bates, M. Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Information Processing and Management, 26, 5 (1990), 575--591. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bates, M. An integrated model of information seeking and searching. Keynote presentation at the 4th International Conference of Information Needs, Seeking, and Use in Different Contexts, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Belkin, N. J. Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. In Proceedings of the First Conference of the Gesselschaft fxr Informatik Fachgruppe Information Retrieval (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Broder, A. A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum, 36, 2 (2002), 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bucciarelli, L. L. Designing Engineers. MIT Press, Boston, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Churchill, E. F. and Erickson, T. Talking about Things in Mediated Conversations: An Introduction. Human Computer Interaction, 18, 1--2 (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cobbledick, S. The information seeking behaviors of artists: exploratory interviews. The Library Quarterly, 66, 4 (1996), 343--372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cowan, S. Informing Visual Poetry: Information Needs and Sources of Artists. Art Documentation, 23, 2 (2004), 14--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Crabtree, A., Twidale, M. B., O'Brien, J. and Nichols, D. M. Talking in the library: implications for the design of digital libraries. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries (1997). ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dormer, P. The language and practical philosophy of craft. In The Culture of Craft, P. Dormer (ed.). Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis, D. The Dilemma of Measurement in Information Retrieval Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 1 (1996), 23--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ford, N. Modeling Cognitive Processes in Information Seeking: From Popper to Pask. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 9 (2004), 769--782. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ford, N., Miller, D. and Moss, N. Web search strategies and retrieval effectiveness: an empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 58, 1 (2001), 30--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, M. and Dumais, S. T. The Vocabulary Problem in Human-System Communication. Communications of the ACM, 30, 11 (1987), 964--971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gamble, J. Modelling the Invisible: the pedagogy of craft apprenticeship. Studies in Continuing Education, 23, 2 (2001), 185--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Greenhalgh, P. The Genre. In The persistence of craft, P. Greenhalgh (ed.). Rutgers University Press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargittai, E. Informed Web Surfing: The Social Context of User Sophistication. In Personal and Global Contexts of Life Online, P. Howard and S. Jones (ed.). Sage Publications, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hemmig, W. S. The information-seeking behavior of visual artists: a literature review. Journal of Documentation, 64, 3 (2008), 343--362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Levine, F. and Heimerl, C. Handmade Nation: The Rise of DIY, Art, Craft, and Design. Princeton Architectural Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. McCullough, M. Abstracting craft: the practised digital hand. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Metcalf, B. and Kennebrew, C. Connect/(Dis)connect. American Craft Council, Summer in the Salon Series, July 24, 2008. http://www.americancraftmag.org/zoom-entry.php?id=5156Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Needleman, C. The work of craft: an inquiry in to the nature of crafts and craftsmanship. Kodansha International, New York, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. O'Connor, E. Embodied knowledge in glassblowing: the experience of meaning and the struggle towards proficiency. Sociological Review, 55, 1 (2007), 126--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Pickens, J., Golovchinsky, G. and Ringel Morris, M. Collaborative information retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (2008). ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pirolli, P. and Card, S. K. Information Foraging. Psychological Review, 106(1999), 634--675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension. Anchor Books, New York, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Pye, D. The nature and art of workmanship. Herbert Press, London, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Savolainen, R. Everyday Life Information Seeking: Approaching Information Seeking in the Context of "Way of Life". Library and Information Science Research, 17(1995), 259--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Talja, S., Tuominen, K. and Savolainen, R. "Isms" in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation, 61, 1 (2005), 79--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Torrey, C., McDonald, D., Schilit, W. and Bly, S. How-To pages: Informal systems of expertise sharing. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ECSCW (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Wagner, A. Behind the scenes things are heating up! American Craft Magazine, March 14, 2008. americancraftmag.org/zoom-entry.php?id=1735Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilson, T. D., Ford, N., Ellis, D., Foster, A. and Spink, A. Information Seeking and Mediated Searching. Part 2. Uncertainty and Its Correlates. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 9 (2002), 704--715. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Learning how: the search for craft knowledge on the internet

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader