Elisa D. Mekler
ABSTRACT
User experience (UX) research has expanded our notion of what makes interactive technology good, often putting hedonic aspects of use such as fun, affect, and stimulation at the center. Outside of UX, the hedonic is often contrasted to the eudaimonic, the notion of striving towards one's personal best. It remains unclear, however, what this distinction offers to UX research conceptually and empirically. We investigate a possible role for eudaimonia in UX research by empirically examining 266 reports of positive experiences with technology and analyzing its relation to established UX concepts. Compared to hedonic experiences, eudaimonic experiences were about striving towards and accomplishing personal goals through technology use. They were also characterized by increased need fulfillment, positive affect, meaning, and long-term importance. Taken together, our findings suggest that while hedonic UX is about momentary pleasures directly derived from technology use, eudaimonic UX is about meaning from need fulfilment.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
zip
pn1048-file4.zip (74.3 KB)
pn1048-file4.zip
- Javier A Bargas-Avila and Kasper Hornbæk. 2011. Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2689-2698. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Roy F Baumeister, Kathleen D Vohs, Jennifer L Aaker, and Emily N Garbinsky. 2013. Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology 8, 6 (2013), 505-516.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden. 2012. Uncomfortable interactions. In CHI '12. ACM, 2005-2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Biswas-Diener, Todd B Kashdan, and Laura A King. 2009. Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. The Journal of Positive Psychology 4, 3 (2009), 208-211.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77-101.Google Scholar
- Antonella Delle Fave, Ingrid Brdar, Teresa Freire, Dianne Vella-Brodrick, and Marié P Wissing. 2011. The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research 100, 2 (2011), 185-207.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pieter Desmet and Marc Hassenzahl. 2012. Towards happiness: Possibility-driven design. In Human-computer interaction: The agency perspective. Springer, 3-27.Google Scholar
- Pieter MA Desmet and Anna E Pohlmeyer. 2013. Positive design: An introduction to design for subjective well-being. International Journal of Design 7, 3 (2013), 5-9.Google Scholar
- Sebastian Deterding, Andrés Lucero, Jussi Holopainen, Chulhong Min, Adrian Cheok, Annika Waern, and Steffen Walz. 2015. Embarrassing Interactions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2365-2368. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Diefenbach, Nina Kolb, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2014. The 'hedonic' in human-computer interaction: history, contributions, and future research directions. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. ACM, 305-314. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbara Grosse-Hering, Jon Mason, Dzmitry Aliakseyeu, Conny Bakker, and Pieter Desmet. 2013. Slow design for meaningful interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3431-3440. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl. 2004. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4 (2004), 319-349. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl. 2005. The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In Funology. Springer, 31-42. Google Scholar
- Marc Hassenzahl, Sarah Diefenbach, and Anja Goritz. 2010. Needs, affect, and interactive products-Facets of user experience. Interacting with computers 22, 5 (2010), 353-362. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl, Kai Eckoldt, Sarah Diefenbach, Matthias Laschke, Eva Lenz, and Joonhwan Kim. 2013. Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness. International Journal of Design 7, 3 (2013), 21-31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Hassenzahl and Daniel Ullrich. 2007. To do or not to do: Differences in user experience and retrospective judgments depending on the presence or absence of instrumental goals. Interacting with Computers 19, 4 (2007), 429-437. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl, Annika Wiklund-Engblom, Anette Bengs, Susanne Hagglund, and Sarah Diefenbach. 2015. Experience-oriented and product-oriented evaluation: psychological need fulfillment, positive affect, and product perception. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2015).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Veronika Huta and Richard M Ryan. 2010. Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies 11, 6 (2010), 735-762.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Veronika Huta and Alan S Waterman. 2014. Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies 15, 6 (2014), 1425-1456.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julie R Irwin and Gary H McClelland. 2003. Negative consequences of dichotomizing continuous predictor variables. Journal of Marketing Research 40, 3 (2003), 366-371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Kahneman, Edward Diener, and Norbert Schwarz. 1999. Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Irene Kamp and Pieter Desmet. 2014. Measuring product happiness. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2509-2514. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evangelos Karapanos, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Jean-Bernard Martens. 2009. User experience over time: an initial framework. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 729-738. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jinhyung Kim, Pyungwon Kang, and Incheol Choi. 2014. Pleasure now, meaning later: Temporal dynamics between pleasure and meaning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55 (2014), 262-270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laura A King, Joshua A Hicks, Jennifer L Krull, and Amber K Del Gaiso. 2006. Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of personality and social psychology 90, 1 (2006), 179.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laura A King and Christie K Napa. 1998. What makes a life good? Journal of personality and social psychology 75, 1 (1998), 156.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Livia J Müller, Elisa D Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2015. Facets In HCI: Towards Understanding Eudaimonic UX-Preliminary Findings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2283-2288. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mary Beth Oliver and Arthur A Raney. 2011. Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication 61, 5 (2011), 984-1004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Timo Partala and Aleksi Kallinen. 2012. Understanding the most satisfying and unsatisfying user experiences: Emotions, psychological needs, and context. Interacting with computers 24, 1 (2012), 25-34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Timo Partala and Timo Saari. 2015. Understanding the most influential user experiences in successful and unsuccessful technology adoptions. Computers in Human Behavior 53 (2015), 381-395. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Peterson, Nansook Park, and Martin EP Seligman. 2005. Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of happiness studies 6, 1 (2005), 25-41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2001. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology 52, 1 (2001), 141-166.Google Scholar
- Richard M Ryan, Veronika Huta, and Edward L Deci. 2008. Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of happiness studies 9, 1 (2008), 139-170.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kennon M Sheldon, Andrew J Elliot, Youngmee Kim, and Tim Kasser. 2001. What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of personality and social psychology 80, 2 (2001), 325.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael F Steger, Todd B Kashdan, and Shigehiro Oishi. 2008. Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality 42, 1 (2008), 22-42.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexandre N Tuch and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Does Herzberg's notion of hygienes and motivators apply to user experience? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 22, 4 (2015), 16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexandre N Tuch, Rune Trusell, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2013. Analyzing users' narratives to understand experience with interactive products. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2079-2088. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alan S Waterman, Seth J Schwartz, and Regina Conti. 2008. The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies 9, 1 (2008), 41-79.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Watson and Lee Anna Clark. 1999. The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. (1999).Google Scholar
- John Zimmerman. 2009. Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 395-404. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Momentary Pleasure or Lasting Meaning?: Distinguishing Eudaimonic and Hedonic User Experiences
Recommendations
Facets In HCI: Towards Understanding Eudaimonic UX -- Preliminary Findings
CHI EA '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn recent years, researchers aimed to understand different facets of positive experiences with technology. Positive psychology, and recently also HCI, makes use of a hedonia/ eudaimonia distinction. Hedonia is understood as providing enjoyable ...
User experience in safety–critical domains: a survey on motivational orientations and psychological need satisfaction in acute care
AbstractThe relevance of user experience in safety–critical domains has been questioned and lacks empirical investigation. Based on previous studies examining user experience in consumer technology, we conducted an online survey on positive experiences ...
What Makes Smartphone Use Meaningful or Meaningless?
Prior research indicates that many people wish to limit aspects of their smartphone use. Why is it that certain smartphone use feels so meaningless? We examined this question by using interviews, the experience sampling method, and mobile logging of 86,...
Comments