skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518765acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Product attachment theory describes how people learn to love certain possessions through a process of meaning making. It provides a rich and as yet untapped source of inspiration for driving the practice of experience design. However, there are currently no guidelines that describe how to apply this theory in design practice. Taking a research through design approach, I made many different products with the goal of helping people become the person they desire to be through their product interactions. Then, in order to better understand how the different design teams applied attachment theory, I created a set of design patterns that document the application of product attachment theory to the interaction design of each product. I clustered the patterns based on similarities across the different artifacts, and this produced six framing constructs, which work as specific perspectives designers can take when applying product attachment theory in an experience design project.

References

  1. Ahuvia, A. C. Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers' Identity Narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 1 (June 2005), 171--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I. and Angel, S. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Belk, R. W. Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 2 (September 1988), 139--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M. and John F. Sherry, J. The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey. The Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 1 (June 1989), 1--38Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Blythe, M. A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A. F. and Wright, P. C. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Buxton, B. Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chung, Eric, Jason I. Hong, James Lin, Madhu K. Prabaker, James A. Landay, and Alan Liu. Development and Evaluation of Emerging Design Patterns for Ubiquitous Computing. Proc. DIS, (2004) ACM Press, 233--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cockton, G. Designing worth is worth designing. In Proc. of NordiCHI, (2006) ACM Press, 165--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Rochber-Halton, E. The Meaning of Things: Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Darrah, C. N., English-Lueck, J.&Freeman, J. Families at work: An ethnography of dual career families, Report for the Sloane Foundation: Grant Number 98-6-21 (2001)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidoff, S., Lee, M.K., Zimmerman, J., Dey, A. Principle of Smart Home Control. In Proc. of Ubicomp. (2006) Springer, 19--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Davidoff, S., Lee, M. K., Dey, A. K. and Zimmerman, J. Rapidly Exploring Application Design Through Speed Dating. In Proceedings of UbiComp, (2007) Springer, 429--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Desmet, P. M. A. Measuring emotion; development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In Funology: from usability to enjoyment. M. A. Blythe, A. F. Monk, K. Overbeeke and P. C. Wright (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, 111--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Desmet, P. M. A. A multilayered model of product emotions. The Design Journal, 6, 2 (2003), 4--13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Djajadiningrat, J. P., Gaver, W. W. and Frens, J. W. Interaction relabeling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. In Proc. of DIS, (2000) ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Erickson, T. Lingua Francas for design: sacred places and pattern languages. In Proc. of DIS, (2000) ACM Press, 357--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Forlizzi, J. and Ford, S. The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers. In Proc. of DIS, (2000) ACM Press, 419--423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Forrest, M., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. Magonote: Making Complex Home Electronics Accessible by Empowering the Family Technology Lead. In Proc. of Design and Emotion, (2008) Design and Emotion Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, Garden City, NY, USA, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Govers, P. C. M. and Mugge, R. 'I love my Jeep, because it's tough like me', The effect of product-personality congruence on product attachment. In Proceedings of Conference on Design and Emotion, (2004) Design and Emotion Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. IxDA design patterns discussion: http://www.ixda.org/topics.php?topic=patternsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. James, W. The Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt, New York, 1890.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jordan, P. W. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. CRC Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kim, J., Zimmerman, J. Cherish: Smart Digital Photo Frames. In Proc. of Design and Emotion, (2006) Design and Emotion Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleine, R. E., Kleine, S. S. and Kernan, J. B. Mundane Consumption and the Self: A Social-Identity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 3 (1993), 209--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kleine, S. S. and Baker, S. M. An Integrative Review of Material Possession Attachment. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 1 (2004), 1--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kleine, S. S., Kleine, R. E. and Allen, C. T. How is a possession 'me' or 'not me'? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 3 (December 1995), 327--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Lee, M.K., Davidoff, S., Zimmerman, J., Dey, A. Smart Bag: Managing Home and Raising Children. In Proc. of DPPI, (2007) ACM Press: 434--437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Louridas, P. Design as bricolage: anthropology meets design thinking. Design Studies, 20(1999), 517--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Martin, D., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., Sommerville, I. and Viller, S. Finding patterns in the fieldwork. In Proc. of Euro CSCW, (2001) Kluwer, 39--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Maslow, A. H. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (1943), 370--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. McAdams, D. P. The Psychology of Life Stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 4 (2001), 100--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Norman, D. A. Emotional Design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Overbeeke, C. J., Djajadiningrat, J. P., Hummels, C. C. M. and Wensveen, S. A. G. Beauty in Usability: Forget about Ease of Use. In Pleasure with products: Beyond usability. W. S. Green and P. W. Jordan (eds). Taylor and Francis, 2002, 9--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ozenc, K., Keum, J.B., Brommer, J., Shih, N., Au, K., Zimmerman, J. Reverse Alarm Clock: Designing for the Self Through Social Identity. In Proc. of DPPI, (2007) ACM Press: 392--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Park, S., Jeong, H., Zimmerman, J. ENSURE: Support for Parents in Managing their Children's Health. In Proc. of Design and Emotion, (2008) Design and Emotion Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (1973), 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Schifferstein, H. N. J., Mugge, R. and Hekkert, P. Designing consumer-product attachment. In Design and Emotion: The Experience of Everyday Things. D. McDonagh, P. Hekkert, J. van Erp and D. Gyi (eds). Taylor and Francis, 2003, 327--331.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Soloman, M. R. The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 3 (1983), 319--329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Sterling, R., Zimmerman, J. Shared Moments: Opportunities for Mobile Phones in Religious Participation. In Proc. of DUX, (2007) ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Stolterman, S. The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research. International Journal of Design, 2, 1 (2008), 55--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Turkle, S. Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. UI Patterns: http://ui-patterns.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. van Duyne, D.K., Landay, J.A., Hong, J. I. The Design of Sites: Principles, Processes, and Patterns for Crafting a Customer-Centered Web Experience, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Wakkary, R., Maestri, L. The Resourcefulness of Everyday Design. In Proc. of C&C, (2007) ACM Press, 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Wensveen, S., Overbeeke, K. and Djajadiningrat, T. Touch me, hit me and I know how you feel: a design approach to emotionally rich interaction. In Proc. of DIS, (2000) ACM Press, 48--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Wright, P., McCarthy, J. and Meekison, L. Making Sense of Experience. In Funology. M. A. Blyth, K. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk and P. C. Wright (eds). Kluwer Academic Press, 2004, 43--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. of CHI, (2007) ACM Press: 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Zimmerman, J., Ozenc, K., Jeong, B. K. New Methods for the Design of Products that Support Social Role Transitions. Artifact, (2009) in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader