skip to main content
10.1145/2639189.2641216acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mundanely miraculous: the robot in healthcare

Published:26 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

As both hero and villain, robots have played prominent roles in media such as films and books. Now, robots are no longer hidden away from the public conscious in fictive worlds or real-life factories. Robots are becoming a real part of our everyday encounters in environments such as healthcare settings. In this paper, we describe a discourse analysis of 60 YouTube videos that showcase robots in healthcare activities. Our narrative weaves three discourses that construct visions of the healthcare robot: (1) the miraculous robot as the robot that enhances patient care; (2) the mundane robot as the innocuous robot that integrates into the workflow seamlessly; and (3) the preternatural robot as the robot that is miraculous but never mundane. We propose several contrary visions to this dominant narrative of healthcare robots as a framework for future fieldwork that, we argue, should investigate the institutions of robotics.

References

  1. World Robotics 2013 Executive Summary. http://www.ifr.org/uploads/media/Executive_Summary_WR_2013.pdf, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartneck, C. From Fiction to Science--A Cultural Reflection of Social Robots. In Proc. of the Workshop on Shaping Human-Robot Interaction--Understanding the Social Aspects of Intelligent Robotic Products, held in conjunction with CHI'04, ACM Press (New York, 2004), 35--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, G., and Dourish, P. Yesterday's tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing's dominant vision. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 2 (2007), 133--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, first ed. Anchor, New York, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Blythe, M., and Cairns, P. Critical Methods and User Generated Content: the iPhone on YouTube. In Proc. of CHI'09, ACM Press (New York, 2009), 1467--1476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Blythe, M., and Cairns, P. Tenori-on Stage: YouTube as Performance Space. In Proc. of NordiCHI'10, ACM Press (New York, 2010), 72--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Broadbent, E., Kuo, I. H., Lee, Y. I., Rabindran, J., Kerse, N., Stafford, R., and MacDonald, B. A. Attitudes and Reactions to a Healthcare Robot. Telemedicine and e-Health 16, 5 (2010), 608--613.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruckenberger, U., Weiss, A., Mirnig, N., Strasser, E., Stadler, S., and Tscheligi, M. The Good, the Bad, the Weird: Audience Evaluation of a "Real" Robot in Relation to Science Fiction and Mass Media. In Social Robotics, G. Herrmann, M. J. Pearson, A. Lenz, P. Bremner, A. Spiers, and U. Leonards, Eds., no. 8239 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, 2013, 301--310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, W.-L., Šabanovic, S., and Huber, L. Use of Seal-like Robot PARO in Sensory Group Therapy for Older Adults with Dementia. In Proc. of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'13), IEEE Press (Piscataway, NJ, 2013), 101--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Clarke, A. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahl, T. S., and Boulos, M. N. K. Robots in Health and Social Care: A Complementary Technology to Home Care and Telehealthcare? Robotics 3, 1 (2013), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Feldman, M. S., and March, J. G. Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26, 2 (1981), 171--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fernaeus, Y., Håkansson, M., Jacobsson, M., and Ljungblad, S. How do you Play with a Robotic Toy Animal?: A long-term study of Pleo. In Proc. of the ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC'10), ACM Press (New York, 2010), 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Forlizzi, J., and DiSalvo, C. Service Robots in the Domestic Environment: A Study of the Roomba Vacuum in the Home. In Proc. of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'06), ACM Press (New York, 2006), 258--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Random House LLC, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Geraci, R. M. Spiritual Robots: Religion and Our Scientific View of the Natural World. Theology and Science 4, 3 (2006), 229--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Harmon, E., and Mazmanian, M. Stories of the Smartphone in Everyday Discourse: Conflict, Tension & Instability. In Proc. of CHI'13, ACM Press (New York, 2013), 1051--1060. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ihde, D. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaplan, F. Who is Afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 1, 3 (2004), 465--480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Khosla, R., Chu, M.-T., Kachouie, R., Yamada, K., and Yamaguchi, T. Embodying Care in Matilda: An Affective Communication Robot for the Elderly in Australia. In Proc. of the ACM International Health Informatics Symposium (IHI'12), ACM Press (New York, 2012), 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Liu, L. S., Huh, J., Neogi, T., Inkpen, K., and Pratt, W. Health Vlogger-Viewer Interaction in Chronic Illness Management. In Proc. of CHI'13, ACM Press (New York, 2013), 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ljungblad, S., Kotrbova, J., Jacobsson, M., Cramer, H., and Niechwiadowicz, K. Hospital Robot at Work: Something Alien or an Intelligent Colleague? In Proc. of CSCW'12, ACM Press (New York, 2012), 177--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mariappan, M., Ganesan, T., Ramu, V., and Iftikhar, M. Safety System and Navigation for Orthopaedic Robot (OTOROB). In Intelligent Robotics and Applications, S. Jeschke, H. Liu, and D. Schilberg, Eds., no. 7102 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Jan. 2011, 358--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nader, L. Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained from Studying Up. In Reinventing Anthropology. Pantheon Books, New York, 1972, 284--311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Phillips, N., and Hardy, C. Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction, second ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Preising, B., Hsia, T., and Mittelstadt, B. A Literature Review: Robots in Medicine. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 10, 2 (1991), 13--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rose, G. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, Mar. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sabanovic, S. Inventing Japan's "robotics culture": The repeated assembly of science, technology, and culture in social robotics. Social Studies of Science 44, 3 (2014), 342--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Siino, R., and Hinds, P. Robots, Gender & Sensemaking: Sex Segregation's Impact on Workers Making Sense of a Mobile Autonomous Robot. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'05), IEEE Press (Piscataway, NJ, 2005), 2773--2778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sucher, J. F., Todd, S. R., Jones, S. L., Throckmorton, T., Turner, K. L., and Moore, F. A. Robotic telepresence: a helpful adjunct that is viewed favorably by critically ill surgical patients. The American Journal of Surgery 202, 6 (2011), 843--847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Yanco, H., and Drury, J. Classifying Human-Robot Interaction: An Updated Taxonomy. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Press (Piscataway, NJ, 2004), 2841--2846 vol.3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Mundanely miraculous: the robot in healthcare

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '14: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational
      October 2014
      361 pages
      ISBN:9781450325424
      DOI:10.1145/2639189

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate89of361submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader