skip to main content
10.1145/2639189.2639220acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Design patterns for mixed-method research in HCI

Published:26 October 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we discuss mixed-method research in HCI. We report on an empirical literature study of the NordiCHI 2012 proceedings which aimed to uncover and describe common mixed-method approaches, and to identify good practices for mixed-methods research in HCI. We present our results as mixed-method research design patterns, which can be used to design, discuss and evaluate mixed-method research. Three dominant patterns are identified and fully described and three additional pattern candidates are proposed. With our pattern descriptions we aim to lay a foundation for a more thoughtful application of, and a stronger discourse about, mixed-method approaches in HCI.

References

  1. Brown, J. M., Lindgaard, G. and Biddle, R. Joint implicit alignment work of interaction designers and software developers. 693--702Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dalsgaard, P. and Halskov, K. Tangible 3D tabletops: combining tangible tabletop interaction and 3D projection. 109--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Giusti, L., Xerxes, K., Schladow, A., Wallen, N., Zane, F. and Casalegno, F. Workspace configurations: setting the stage for remote collaboration on physical tasks. 351--360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Grubert, J., Grasset, R. and Reitmayr, G. Exploring the design of hybrid interfaces for augmented posters in public spaces. 238--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gonzalez, B., Carroll, E. and Latulipe, C. Dance-inspired technology, technology-inspired dance. 398--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hansen, J. P., Glenstrup, A. J., Wusheng, W., Weiping, L. and Zhonghai, W. Collecting location-based voice messages on a TalkingBadge. 219--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Laporte, L., Slegers, K. and De Grooff, D. Using Correspondence Analysis to monitor the persona segmentation process. 265--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Center for Environmental Structure, 1977Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartneck, C. and Rauterberg, M. HCI reality: an "Unreal Tournament"#8482;? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 8 (2007), 737--743. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bergman, M. M. Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Sage, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bødker, S. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2006, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Borchers, J. O. A pattern approach to interaction design. In AI & Society, 15, 4 (2001), 359--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Blomberg, J. and Karasti, H. Positioning ethnography within Participatory Design. In Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design, 2012, 86--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryman, A. Why do researchers integrate/combine/mesh/blend/mix/merge/fuse quantitative and qualitative research. Advances in mixed methods research, (2008), 87--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll, J. M. and Kellogg, W. A. Artifact as theory-nexus: Hermeneutics meets theory-based design. In Proceedings of CHI 1989, 7--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. CHI 2013 Contribution Types. Available from: http://chi2013.acm.org/authors/call-for-participation/papers-notes/selecting-a-contribution-type/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Cockton, G. Make Evaluation Poverty History. In Proceedings of CHI 2007 (Alt.Chi), ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Cockton, G. Revisiting usability's three key principles. In Proceedings of CHI 2008, ACM, 2473--2484 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Creswell, J. W. and Clark, V. L. P. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Wiley Online Library, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dorst, C. H. Describing Design-A comparison of paradigms. PhD Thesis Delft University of Technology (1997).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Fallman, D. The interaction design research triangle of design practice, design studies, and design exploration. Design Issues, 24, 3 (2008), 4--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Gaver, W. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of CHI 2012. ACM, 937--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. and Graham, W. F. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 11, 3 (1989), 255--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Gregor, S. and Hevner, A. R. Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. MIS Quarterly, 37, 2 (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Grudin, J. Three faces of human-computer interaction. Annals of the History of Computing, IEEE, 27, 4 (2005), 46--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gwet, K. Handbook of inter-rater reliability. Gaithersburg, MD: STATAXIS Publishing Company, (2001), 223--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrison, S., Tatar, D. and Sengers, P. The three paradigms of HCI. In Proceedings of CHI 2007 ACM. ppGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J. and Gamma, E. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J. and Ram, S. Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 28, 1 (2004), 75--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Järvinen, P. Research Questions Guiding Selection of an Appropriate Research Method. In ECIS (2000), 124--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jarvis, N., Cameron, D. and Boucher, A. Attention to detail: annotations of a design process. In proceedings of NordiCHI 2012, ACM, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J. and Wensveen, S. Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Elsevier, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Mackay, W. E. and Fayard, A. HCI, natural science and design: a framework for triangulation across disciplines. Proceedings of DIS 1997. ACM, 223--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. McKenney, S. and Reeves, T. Conducting educational design research. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Mingers, J. Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information systems research, 12, 3 (2001), 240--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Newman, W. A preliminary analysis of the products of HCI research, using pro forma abstracts. Proceedings of CHI 1994. ACM, 278--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Nunamaker Jr, J. F. and Chen, M. Systems development in information systems research. In Proceedings of System Sciences. IEEE, 1990, 631--640.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Oates, B. J. Researching information systems and computing. Sage, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Pan, Y. and Stolterman, E. Pattern language and HCI: expectations and experiences. In Proceedings of CHI 2013, ACM, 1989--1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Petter, S. C. and Gallivan, M. J. Toward a framework for classifying and guiding mixed method research in information systems. Proceedings of System Sciences 2004. IEEE Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Rauterberg, M. HCI as an engineering discipline: to be or not to be!? African Journal of Information & Communication Technology, 2, 4 (2006), 22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Runkel, P. J. and MacGrath, J. E. Research on human behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. New York, 1972Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaw, M. What makes good research in software engineering? International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 4, 1 (2002), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Turnhout, K. van, Craenmehr, S. Holwerda, R., Menijn, M., Zwart, J. P. and Bakker, R. Trade-offs in Design Research: Development Oriented Triangulation. Proceedings of the BSC HCI Conference 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L. and Nardi, B. A. Let's stop pushing the envelope and start addressing it: a reference task agenda for HCI. Human--Computer Interaction, 15, 2-3 (2000), 75--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Wolf, T. V., Rode, J. A., Sussman, J. and Kellogg, W. A. Dispelling design as the black art of CHI. In Proceedings of CHI 2006. ACM, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of CHI 2007. ACM, 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design patterns for mixed-method research in HCI

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '14: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational
      October 2014
      361 pages
      ISBN:9781450325424
      DOI:10.1145/2639189

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate89of361submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader