skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557314acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Invisible connections: investigating older people's emotions and social relations around objects

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The advent of the Internet of Things creates an interest in how people might interrelate through and with networks of internet enabled objects. With an emphasis on fostering social connection and physical activity among older people, this preliminary study investigated objects that people over the age of 65 years viewed as significant to them. We conducted contextual interviews in people's homes about their significant objects in order to understand the role of the objects in their lives, the extent to which they fostered emotional and social connections and physical activity, and how they might be augmented through internet connection.

Discussion of significant objects generated considerable emotion in the participants. We identified objects of comfort and routine, objects that exhibited status, those that fostered independence and connection, and those that symbolized relationships with loved ones. These findings lead us to consider implications for the design of interconnected objects.

References

  1. Aarhus, R., Ballegaard, S. A. Negotiating Boundaries: Managing Disease at Home, CHI 2010, ACM Press, (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bagalkot, N., Sokoler, T., Unboxing the tools for physical rehabilitation: embracing the difference between the clinic and home, NordiCHI 2012, ACM Press (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Beyer, Hugh, Karen Holtzblatt. Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Elsevier, (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brereton, Margot. Habituated objects: everyday tangibles that foster the independent living of an elderly woman. interactions 20, 4 (2013), 20--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buys, L., Active and Productive Ageing: What is the Real Experience of Australians? Research Bulletin (2005) 1(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Why we need things. History from things: Essays on material culture, (1993) 20--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dourish, P. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Law, A., Pennington, S., & Villar, N. The history tablecloth: illuminating domestic activity. Proc. Designing Interactive Systems 2006 (Vol. 26, No. 28, pp. 199--208). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gronvall, E., Verdezoto, N., Beyond Self-Monitoring: Understanding non-functional Aspects of Home-based Healthcare Technology. UbiComp 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. Proc. CHI 2006 ACM Press 2006 p. 437--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits atoms. CHI'97 (pp. 234--241). ACM Press 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kirk, D., & Sellen, A., (2010). On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects ACM Trans Comput.- Hum Interact. (Vol. 17, Issue 3, p. 1--43). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard Uni Press. p. 179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Leonardi, C., Mennecozzi, C., Not, E., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M., Gennai, F., & Cristoforetti, A. Knocking on elders' door: investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space. Proc. CHI 2009 ACM (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mueller, F. F., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Pedell, S., & Howard, S.. Hug over a distance. Proc CHI 2005, ACM (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization studies, 28(9), 1435--1448.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Suchman, L., Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs, M., & Howard, S. (2009). The Magic Box and Collage: Responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play. Int Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Van den Hoven, E., Sas, C., & Whittaker, S., (2012) Introduction to this Special Issue on Designing for Personal Memories: Past, Present, and Future. Human-Computer Interaction 2012 (Vol. 27, pp. 1--12).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Invisible connections: investigating older people's emotions and social relations around objects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader