skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531631acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Craving, creating, and constructing comfort: insights and opportunities for technology in hospice

Published:15 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hospice is a medical setting for patients with terminal illnesses where active treatment is withdrawn in favor of providing comfort and dignity at the end of life. Providing comfort extends beyond managing physical pain to include social, emotional, spiritual, and environmental aspects of care. We studied technology's role in achieving these multifaceted dimensions of comfort through interviews with 16 family members of past hospice patients. Comfort was an ongoing pursuit, requiring the involvement of diverse stakeholders; communication technologies were selectively chosen in service of this achievement. We provide opportunities and recommendations for technologies in hospice, including the need for varying degrees of richness and symmetry, and for support for life-affirming acts. To our knowledge, this constitutes the first study, in the CSCW and HCI literatures, of communication technology use during the final days of a person's life, with implications both for hospice and for the end of life more broadly.

References

  1. Battley, J., Balding, L., Gilligan, O., O'Connell, C., & O'Brien, T. (2012). From Cork to Budapest by Skype: Living and dying. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care, 2, 168--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Blythe, M. et al. (2010). Age and experience: Ludic engagement in a residential care setting. In Proc. DIS 2010. 161--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bonanno, G. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am. Psychol., 59(1), 20--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brubaker, J. R., & Hayes, G. R. (2011). We will never forget you {online}: An empirical investigation of post-mortem MySpace comments. In Proc. CSCW 2011, 123--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buis, L. R. (2008). Emotional and informational support messages in an online hospice support community. Comput. Inform. Nurs., 26(6), 358--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Clark, D. (2000) Total pain: The work of Cicely Saunders and the hospice movement. American Pain Society Bulletin, 10 (4), 13--15. ISSN 1057--1590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Clayton, P. (1979). The sequelae and nonsequelae of conjugal bereavement. Am. J. Psych., 136(12), 1530--1534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Clements-Cortés, A. (2004). The use of music in facilitating emotional expression in the terminally ill. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Me., 21(4), 255--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Consolvo, S., Roessler, P., & Shelton, B. E. (2004). The CareNet display: Lessons learned from an in home evaluation of an ambient display. In Proc. UBICOMP 2004, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Demmer, C. (2003). A national survey of hospice bereavement services. OMEGA-J. Death Dying, 47(4), 327--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Friedman, B., & Nathan, L. P. (2010). Multi-lifespan information system design: A research initiative for the HCI community. In Proc. CHI 2010, 2243--2246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gaver, W. et al. (2011). The Photostroller: Supporting diverse care home residents in engaging with the world. In Proc. CHI 2011, 1757--1766 . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Getty, E., Cobb, J., Gabeler, M., Nelson, C., Weng, E., & Hancock, J. (2011). I said your name in an empty room: Grieving and continuing bonds on Facebook. In Proc. CHI 2011, 997--1000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gulotta, R., Odom, W., Forlizzi, J., & Faste, H. (2013). Digital artifacts as legacy: Exploring the lifespan and value of digital data. In Proc. CHI 2013, 1813--1822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Heyland, D. K. et al. (2006). What matters most in end of life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. Can. Med. Assoc. J., 174(5), 627--633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Houck, K., Avis, N. E., Gallant, J. M., Fuller, A. F., & Goodman, A. (1999). Quality of Life in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Identifying Specific Concerns. J. Palliat. Med. 2(4), 397--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kane, R. L., Klein, S., Berstein, L., & Rothenberg, R. (1986). The role of hospice in reducing the impact of bereavement. J. Chron. Dis., 39(9), 735--742.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kilbourn, K. M., Costenaro, A., Madore, S., DeRoche, K., Anderson, D., Keech, T., & Kutner, J. S. (2011). Feasibility of a telephone-based counseling program for informal caregivers of hospice patients. J Palliat. Med., 14(11), 1200--1205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kinsella, A. (2013). About telehospice care. National Care Planning Council. Retrieved 28 May 2013 from: http://www.longtermcarelink.net/eldercare/telehospice.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kissane, D. W., McKenzie, M., Bloch, S., Moskowitz, C., McKenzie, D. P., & O'Neill, I. (2006). Family Focused Grief Therapy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial in Palliative Care and Bereavement. Am J Psychiatry, 163(7), 1208--1218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Massimi, M. (2013). Exploring remembrance and social support behavior in an online bereavement support group. In Proc. CSCW 2013, 1169--1180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Massimi, M., & Charise, A. (2009). Dying, death, and mortality: Towards thanatosensitivity in HCI. In Ext. Abs. CHI 2009, 2459--2468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Massimi, M., Odom, W., Banks, R., & Kirk, D. (2011). Matters of life and death: Locating the end of life in lifespan-oriented HCI research. In Proc. CHI 2011, 987--996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. McCann, R., Hall, W., & Groth-Juncker, A. (1994). Comfort care for terminally ill patients: the appropriate use of nutrition and hydration. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 272(16), 1263--1266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Merritt, S., Durrant, A., Reeves, S., & Kirk, D. (2012). In dialogue: Methodological insights on doing HCI research in Rwanda. In Proc. CHI 2012, 661--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mynatt, E. D., Rowan, J., Craighill, S., & Jacobs, A. (2001). Digital family portraits: Supporting peace of mind for extended family members. In Proc. CHI 2001, 333--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Navaie-Waliser, M., Spriggs, A., Feldman, P. H. (2002). Informal Caregiving: Differential experiences by gender. Med. Care, 40(12), 1249--1259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Neustaedter, C. & Greenberg, S. (2012). Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. In Proc. CHI 2012, 753--762. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Odom, W., Banks, R., Kirk, D., Harper, R., Lindley, S., & Sellen, A. (2012). Technology heirlooms' Considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials. In Proc. CHI 2012, 337--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Odom, W., Harper, R., Sellen, A., Kirk, D., & Banks, R. (2010). Passing on & putting to rest: Understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies. In Proc. CHI 2010, 1831--1840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Oliver, D. P., Demiris, G., Wittenberg-Lyles, E., Washington, K., Day, T., & Novak, K. (2012). A Systematic review of the evidence base for telehospice. Telemed. J. E. Health, 18(1), 38--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Oliver, D. P., Wittenberg-Lyles, E., Washington, K. T., & Sehrawat, S. (2009). Social work role in hospice pain management: A national survey. J. Soc. Work End Life Palliat. Care, 5(1--2), 61--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Petrelli, D., Villar, N., Kalnikaite, V., Dib, L., & Whittaker. S. (2010). FM radio: Family interplay with sonic mementos. In Proc. CHI 2010, 2371--2380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Prendergast, T. J., Puntillo, K. A. (2002). Withdrawal of life support: intensive caring at the end of life. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 288(21), 2732--2740.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Radtke, J. V., Baumann, B. M., Garrett, K. L., & Happ, M. B. (2011). Listening to the voiceless patient: Case reports in assisted communication in the intensive care unit. J. Palliat. Med., 14(6), 791--795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Rhymes, J. (1990). Hospice care in America. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 264(3), 369--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Rosenfeld, B., Breitbart, W., McDonald, M. V., Passik, S. D., Thaler, H., & Portenoy, R. K. (1996). Pain in ambulatory AIDS patients. II: Impact of pain on psychological functioning and quality of life. Pain, 68(2--3), 323--328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Showalter, S. E. (2010). Compassion fatigue: What is it? Why does it matter? Recognizing the symptoms, acknowledging the impact, developing the tools to prevent compassion fatigue, and strengthen the professional already suffering from the effects. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care, 27(4), 239--242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sofka, C., Cupit, I. N., & Gilbert, K. R. (2012). Dying, Death, and Grief in an Online Universe: For Counselors and Educators. New York, NY: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Steinhauser, K. E., Christakis, N. A., Clipp, E. C., McNeilly, M., McIntyre, L., & Tulsky, J. A. (2000). Factors Considered Important at the End of Life by Patients, Family, Physicians, and Other Care Providers. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 284(19), 2476--2482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Stewart, A. L., Teno, J., Patrick, D. L., & Lynn, J. (1999). The Concept of Quality of Life of Dying Persons in the Context of Health Care. J. Pain Symptom Manage., 17(2), 93--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Tang, W., Aaronson, L. S., & Forbes, S. A. (2004). Quality of Life in Hospice Patients with Terminal Illness. West. J. Nurs. Res., 26(1), 113--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Washington, K. T., Demiris, G., Parker Oliver, D., & Day, M. (2007). Home Internet use among hospice service recipients: Recommendations for web-based interventions. J. Med. Syst., 31(5), 385--389. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Wilkie, D. J. et al. (2000). Effects of massage on pain intensity, analgesics and quality of life in patients with cancer pain: A pilot study of a randomized clinical trial conducted within hospice care delivery. Hosp. J., 15(3), 31--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Willis, L., Demiris, G., & Oliver, D. (2007). Internet Use by Hospice Families and Providers: A Review. J Med Syst, 31(2), 97--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. World Health Organization. (2013). WHO definition of palliative care. Retrieved 28 May 2013 from http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Craving, creating, and constructing comfort: insights and opportunities for technology in hospice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
      February 2014
      1600 pages
      ISBN:9781450325400
      DOI:10.1145/2531602

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 February 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate134of497submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader