skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2207723acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Technology heirlooms?: considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Material artifacts are passed down as a way of sustaining relationships and family history. However, new issues are emerging as families are increasingly left with the digital remains of their loved ones. We designed three devices to investigate how digital materials might be passed down, lived with and inherited in the future. We conducted in-home interviews with 8 families using the devices to provoke discussion about how technology might support (or complicate) their existing practices. Sessions revealed families desired to treat their archives in ways not fully supported by technology as well as potential tensions that could emerge. Findings are interpreted to detail design considerations for future work in this emerging space.

References

  1. Bannon, L. 2006. Forgetting as a feature, not a bug: the duality of memory and implications for ubiquitous computing. CoDesign, Vol. 2, 1, 3--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Belk, R. 1990. The Role of Possessions in Constructing and Maintaining a Sense of Past. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 669--676.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunne, T., Raby, F. 2001. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhauser.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Durrant, A., Taylor, A., Frohlich, D., Sellen, A., Uzzell, D. 2009. Photo Displays and Intergenerational Relationships in the Family Home. Proc. of BCS HCI '09, 10--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fallman, D. 2003. Design-oriented human-computer inter-action. In Proc. Of CHI '03, 225--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Finch, J., Mason, J. 2000. Passing On: Kinship & Inheri-tance in England. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman, B., Nathan, L. 2010. Multi-lifespan Information System Design: A Research Initiative for the HCI Commu-nity. Proc. of CHI '10, 2243--2246 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Frohlich, D., Murphy, R. 2000. The Memory Box. Per-sonal Ubiquitous Comput. 4, 4, 238--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gaver, B., Martin, H. Alternatives: Exploring Information Appliances through Conceptual Design Proposals. In Proc.of CHI '00, 2000, 209--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hallam, E., Hockey, J. 2001. Death, Memory and Material Culture. Oxford: Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hallnas, L., Redstrom, J. 2001. Slow Technology: Design-ing for Reflection. Personal Ubiquit. Comput. 5, 201--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hutchinson, H. et al. 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. Proc. of CHI '03, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kaye, J. et al. 2006. To have and to hold: exploring the personal archive. Proc. of CHI '06, 275--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kirk, D., Sellen, A. 2010. On human remains: Value and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects. In ACM Trans. Comput. 'Hum. Interact. 17, 3, 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kirk, D. Izadi, S., Sellen, A., et al. 2010. Opening up the family archive. Proc. of CSCW '10, 261--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Massimi, M., Baecker, R. 2010. A Death in the Family: Opportunities for Designing Technologies for the Be-reaved. Proc. of CHI '10, 1821--1830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Miller, D., Parrot, F. 2009. Loss and Material Culture in South London. J. of R. Anthro. Inst., Vol. 15, 3, 502--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. .Net Gadgeteer. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/gadgeteer/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Odom, W., Harper, R., Sellen, A., Kirk, D., Banks, R. 2010. Passing on and putting to rest: Understanding be-reavement in the context of interactive technologies. Proc. of CHI '10, 1831--1840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Odom, W., Pierce, J., Stolterman, E., Blevis, E. 2009. Un-derstanding why we preserve some things and discard oth-ers in the context of interaction design. Proc. of CHI '09, 1053--1062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Petrelli, D., Villar, N., Kalnikaite, V., Dib, L., Whittaker, S. 2010. FM radio: family interplay with sonic mementos. Proc. Of CHI '10, 2371--2380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Schön, D., Bennet, J. 1996. Reflective Conversation with Materials. Bringing Design to Software, 171--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., Kaye, J. 2005. Reflective design. Proc. of CC '05, 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stevens, M, Abowd, G., Truong, K., Vollmer, F. 2003. Getting into the Living Memory Box: Family archives and holistic design. Personal Ubiquitous Comput, 7, 210--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Technology heirlooms?: considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader