skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2470714acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Probing bus stop for insights on transit co-design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social computing provides a new way for citizens to engage with their public service. Our research investigates how social computing might support citizens co-design their transit service. We conducted a field study with public transit riders, exploring the issues and controversies that reveal conflicting communities. Our analyses revealed three insights. First, encourage citizens to share what they see as the rationale for current service offerings. Second, encourage citizens to share the consequences of current services and of proposed changes and new designs. Third, focus on producing a shared citizen and service provider understanding of what the goals and mission of the public service should be.

References

  1. Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D. and Sundblad, Y. Co-Operative Design: Perspectives on 20 Years with 'the Scandinavian IT Design Model'. In Proc. of NordiCHI, (2000) ACM Press, 22--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brabham, D. C. Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory, 8, 3 (2009), 242--262.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradwell, P. and Marr, S. Making the Most of Collaboration an International Survey of Public Service Co-Design. DEMOS, in association with PriceWaterhouseCoopers Public Sector Research Centre, London, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chango, M. Challenges to e-government in Africa south of Sahara. In Proc. of the Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cho, J. S., Chun, S. A. Towards transparent policy decision making process. In Proc. of Digital Government Research Conference, (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. DiSalvo, C. Design and the Construction of Publics. Design Issues, 25, 1 (2009), 48--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A. and Roos, I. Service Portraits in Service Research: A Critical Review. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16, 1 (2005), 107--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans-Cowley, J. S. Crowdsourcing the Curriculum: Public Participation in Redesigning a Planning Program. Working Paper, (February 12, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1760525Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Gaver, W. W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Cultural Probes. interactions, 6,1 (1999) 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Goldstein, S. M., Johnston, R., Duffy, J. A. and Rao, J. The Service Concept: The Missing Link in Service Design Research? Journal of Operations Management, 20, 2 (2002), 121--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirsch, T. Contestational Design: Innovation for political activism. Dissertation. MIT, Dept. of Architecture, Program in Media Arts and Sciences, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Holmlid, S. Participative, Co-Operative, Emancipatory: From Participatory Design to Service Design. In Proceedings of Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation, (2009) Oslo School of Architecture and Design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Janowski, T., Ojo, A. and Estevez, E. Rapid Development of Electronic Public Services: A Case Study in Electronic Licensing Service. In Proc of Conference on Digital Government Research, (2007) Digital Government Society of North America, 292--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kaschesky, M., Riedl, R. Top-level decisions through public deliberation on the internet. In Proc. Of the Conference on Digital Government Research, (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J. and Wensveen, S. Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. King, S. F. and Brown, P. Fix My Street or Else: Using the Internet to Voice Local Public Service Concerns. In Proc. of Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (2007) ACM Press. 72--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M. M. Public online consultation of federal ministries and federal regulatory agencies in Brazil. In Proc. of the Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ng, I. C. L., Maull, R. S. and Smith, L. Embedding the New Discipline of Service Science. In The Science of Service Systems. H. Demirkan, J. H. Spohrer and V. Krishna (eds). Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ParkScan: http://parkscan.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Petrik, K. Participation and e-democracy how to utilize web 2.0 for policy decision-making. In Proc. of the Conference on Digital Government Research, (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V. Co-Opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review, 78, 1 (2000), 79--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Qian, H. Global perspectives on e-governance. In Proc. of the Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rodrigo, D., Amo, P. A. (2006): Background Document on Public Consultation. OECD, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Saad-Sulonen, J. and Cabrera, A. B. Setting up a Public Participation Project Using the Urban Mediator Tool: A Case of Collaboration between Designers and City Planners. In Proc. of NordiCHI, (2008) ACM Press, 539--542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Saad-Sulonen, J., Botero, A. and Kuutti, K. A Long-Term Strategy for Designing (in) the Wild: Lessons from the Urban Mediator and Traffic Planning in Helsinki. In Proc. of DIS (2012) ACM Press, 166--175 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Shostack, G. L. How to Design a Service. In European Journal of Marketing 16, 1 (1982), 49--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative, 2nd Ed. SAGE Publications, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tomkins, A. J., PytlikZilllig, L. M., Herian, M. N., Abdel-Monem, T., Hamm, J. A. (2010): Public input for municipal policymaking. In Proc of the Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. US Census Bureau (2010): http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acsbr09-5.pdf Accessed: September 1, 2012.Winner, L. "Do Artifacts Have Politics?" in The Whale and The Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Yoo, D., Zimmerman, J., Steinfeld, A., and Tomasic, A. Understanding the Space for Co-Design in Riders' Interactions with a Transit Service. In Proc of CHI, (2010) ACM Press, 1797--1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Zimmeramn, J., Tomasic, A., Garrod, C., Yoo, D., Hiruncharoenvate, C., Aziz, R., Thiruvengadam, N. R., Huang, Y., and Steinfeld, A. Field Trial of Tiramisu: Crowd-Sourcing Bus Arrival Times to Spur Co-Design. In Proc of CHI, (2011) ACM Press, 1677--1686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proc. of CHI, (2007) ACM Press, 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Probing bus stop for insights on transit co-design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader