skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753596acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding the space for co-design in riders' interactions with a transit service

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The recent advances in web 2.0 technologies and the rapid adoption of smart phones raises many opportunities for public services to improve their services by engaging their users (who are also owners of the service) in co-design: a dialog where users help design the services they use. To investigate this opportunity, we began a service design project investigating how to create repeated information exchanges between riders and a transit agency in order to create a virtual "place" from which the dialog on services could take place. Through interviews with riders, a workshop with a transit agency, and speed dating of design concepts, we have developed a design direction. Specifically, we propose a service that combines vehicle location and "fullness" ratings provided by riders with dynamic route change information from the transit agency as a foundation for a dialog around riders conveying input for continuous service improvement.

References

  1. Abdel-Aty, M.A. Using ordered probit modeling to study the effect of ATIS on transit ridership, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 9, 4 (2001), 265--277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bradwell, P. and Marr, S. Making the Most of Collaboration an International Survey of Public Service Co-Design, DEMOS Report 23. (2008), DEMOS, in association with PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) Public Sector Research Centre, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bitner, M.J., Ostrom, A.L. and Morgan, F.N. Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation. California Management Review, 50, 3 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Boyne, G.A. Sources of Public Service Improvement: A Critical Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 3 (July 2003), 367--394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Casey, C. Real-time information: Now arriving. Metro Magazine, http://www.metro-magazine.com/Article/Story/2003/04/Real-Time-Information-Now-Arriving.aspx (Accessed Sept 11, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang, A.M. and Kannan, P.K. Leveraging Web 2.0 in Government. E-Government/Technology Series, (2008) IBM Center for The Business of Government.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Crandall, W., Bentzen, B.L., Myers, L. and Brabyn, J. New Orientation and Accessibility Option for Persons with Visual Impairment: Transportation Applications for Remote Infrared Audible Signage. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 84, 3 (2001), 120--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Davidoff, S., Lee, M.K., Dey, A.K. and Zimmerman, J. Rapidly Exploring Application Design through Speed Dating. In Proc. of UbiComp, (2007) Springer, 429--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gildea, G., Sheikh, M. Applications of technology in providing transit information. In Transportation Research Record 1521, (1996), 71--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. HumanWare: http://www.humanware.com/en-usa/products/gps (Accessed Sept 11, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. iBurgh: http://www.appstorehq.com/iburgh-iphone-63857/app (Accessed Sep 11, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuusisto, A. and Päällysaho, S. Customer Role in Service Production and Innovation -- Looking for Directions for Future Research, Report 195, (2008) Lappeenranta University of Technology, http://akseli.tekes.fi/opencms/opencms/OhjelmaPortaali/ohjelmat/Serve/fi/Dokumenttiarkisto/Viestinta_ja_aktivointi/Julkaisut/Kuusisto_Paeaelllysaho_raportti.pdf. (Accessed: August 29, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, C., Willis, K. Modeling context aware interaction for wayfinding using mobile devices. In Proc. of MobileHCI (2006), ACM Press, 97--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Masoodian, M., Lane, N. 2003. An empirical study of textual and graphical travel itinerary visualization using mobile phones. In Proc of AUIC (2003), ACM Press, 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Norman, D. The design of future things. 2007, New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nuance: http://www.nuance.com/talks/wayfinder.asp (Accessed Sept 11, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Osimo, D. Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 23358 EN. (2008), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC European Commission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Parameswaran, M. and Whinston, A.B. Research Issues in Social Computing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 6 (2007), 336--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Parks, R.B., Baker, P.C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S.L., Vandivord, M.B., Whitaker, G.P. and Wilson, R. Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9 (1999), 1001--1011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. ParkScan San Francisco: http://www.parkscan.org/ (Accessed Sept 11, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Repenning, A., Ioannidou, A. Mobility agents: guiding and tracking public transportation users. In Proc. of AVI (2006), ACM Press, 127--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sabal, R. Television Executives Speak About Fan Letters to the Networks. In The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media. L.A. Lewis (eds). 1992, 185--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Steinfeld, A., Aziz, R., Von Dehsen, L., Park, S.Y., Maisel, J., & Steinfeld, E. (2010). Modality preference for rider reports on transit accessibility problems. Transportation Research Board 2010 Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Transportation Research Board. Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis 37: Communicating with Persons with Disabilities in a Multimodal Transit Environment. 2001, National Academy Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, F.-Y., Zeng, D., Carley, K.M. and Mao, W. Social Computing: From Social Informatics to Social Intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22, 2 (2007), 79--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Evenson, S. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings CHI, (2007) ACM Press, 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding the space for co-design in riders' interactions with a transit service

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2690 pages
      ISBN:9781605589299
      DOI:10.1145/1753326

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader