skip to main content
10.1145/1572532.1572538acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessoupsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A "nutrition label" for privacy

Published:15 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We used an iterative design process to develop a privacy label that presents to consumers the ways organizations collect, use, and share personal information. Many surveys have shown that consumers are concerned about online privacy, yet current mechanisms to present website privacy policies have not been successful. This research addresses the present gap in the communication and understanding of privacy policies, by creating an information design that improves the visual presentation and comprehensibility of privacy policies. Drawing from nutrition, warning, and energy labeling, as well as from the effort towards creating a standardized banking privacy notification, we present our process for constructing and refining a label tuned to privacy. This paper describes our design methodology; findings from two focus groups; and accuracy, timing, and likeability results from a laboratory study with 24 participants. Our study results demonstrate that compared to existing natural language privacy policies, the proposed privacy label allows participants to find information more quickly and accurately, and provides a more enjoyable information seeking experience.

References

  1. ]]Balasubramanian, S. and Cole, C. "Consumers' Search and Use of Nutrition Information: The Challenge and Promise of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act." Journal of Marketing. 2002. Vol. 66, 112--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ]]Beard, T. C., Nowson, C. A., Riley, M. D. "Traffic-light food labels." Med J Aust. 2007;186:19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ]]Belser, B. Designing the Food Label: Nutrition Facts. AIGA Journal. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ]]Buckley, P. and Shepherd, R. Ergonomic factors: The clarity of food labels. British Food Journal. 1993. 95Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ]]Byrd-Bredbenner, C., Alfieri, L., Wong, A., and Cottee, P. The Inherent Educatiional Qualities of Nutrition Labels. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol 29, No 3, March 2001 265--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. ]]Cranor, L., Egelman, S., Sheng, S., McDonald, A., and Chowdhury, A. P3P Deployment on Websites. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Volume 7, Issue 3, Autumn 2008, Pages 274--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. ]]Consumer Product Safety Commission. "Labeling Requirements for Toy and Game Advertisements." 2008. http://cpsc.gov/library/foia/foia08/brief/toygameads.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ]]DeJoy, D. M., Cameron, K. A., and Della, L. J. Post-exposure evaluation of warning effectiveness: A review of field studies and population-based research. The Handbook of Warnings. 2006. (35--48).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ]]Downs J. S., Loewenstein G., and Wisdom J. Strategies for Promoting Healthier Food Choices. American Economic Review. 2009, vol. 99, issue 2, pages 159--64Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ]]Drichoutis AC, Lazaridis P, Nayga RM. 2006. Consumers' use of nutritional labels: a review of research studies and issues. Acad Marketing Sci Rev, no. 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ]]The Energy Label. 2007. www.energyrating.gov.auGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ]]European Union Commission Directive 98/11/EC "Energy Labeling." 1998. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1998:071:0001:0008:EN:PDFGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. ]]Food Standards Agency. "Signpost Labeling Research." 2005 http://www.food.gov.uk/foodlabelling/signposting/siognpostlabelresearch/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. ]]Jensen, C. and Potts, C. Privacy policies as decision-making tools: an evaluation of online privacy notices. SIGCHI. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. ]]Kelley, P., A. McDonald, R. Reeder, and L. Cranor. P3P Expandable Grids. Poster at Privacy MindSwap Carnegie Mellon University. 2007. http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/soups/2008/posters/kelley.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. ]]Kleimann Communication Group, Inc. Evolution of a Prototype Financial Privacy Notice. February 2006. Available: http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/privacyinitiatives/ftcfinalreport060228.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ]]Levy, A. and Hastak, M. Consumer Comprehension of Financial Privacy Notices. December 2008. Available: http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/privacyinitiatives/Levy-Hastak-Report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. ]]Maubach, N., Hoek J. "The Effect of Alternative Nutrition Information Formats on Consumers' Evaluations of a Children's Breakfast Cereal" Proceedings of the EParternships, Proof and Practice -- International Nonprofit and Social Marketing Conference 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ]]McDonald, A., Reeder, R. W., Kelley, P. G., and Cranor, L. F. A Comparison of Online Privacy Policies and Formats. Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. ]]McDonald, A, and Cranor, L. The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies. Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. ]]Privacy Leadership Initiative. Privacy Notices Research Final Results, November 2001, Available at: http://www.understandingprivacy.org/content/library/datasum.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. ]]Reeder, R. W. Expandable Grids: A user interface visualization technique and a policy semantics to support fast, accurate security and privacy policy authoring. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon. 2008. http://www.robreeder.com/pubs/ReederThesis.pdf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. ]]Reeder, R., Cranor, L., Kelley, P., and McDonald, A. A User Study of the Expandable Grid Applied to P3P Privacy Policy Visualization. Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. 2008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. ]]Seymore, J. D., Lazarus Yaroch, A., Serdula M., Blanck, H. M., and Khan, L. K. "Impact of nutrition environmental interventions on point-of-purchase behavior in adults a review." Preventative Medicine 2004. 29: S108--S136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. ]]The Center for Information Policy Leadership, H. W. L. Multi-layered notices.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. ]]Turow, J. Feldman, L., and Meltzer, K. Open to Exploitation: American Shoppers Online and Offline. The Annenberg Public Policy Center. 2005. http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/NewsDetails.aspx?myId=31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. ]]U.S. Food and Drug Administration. A Food Labeling Guide. Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition. 1999. http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/%7Edms/flg-toc.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. ]]U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Guide to Nutrition Labeling and Education Act Requirements" 1994. http://www.fda.gov/ora/inspect_ref/igs/nleatxt.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. ]]U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "New OTC Drug Facts Label" FDA Consumer Magazine. 2002. http://www.fda.gov/FDAC/features/2002/402_otc.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. ]]W3C. The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. ]]W3C. The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.1 (P3P1.1) Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P11/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. ]]WELS Regulator (Australian Government). "WELS and Watermark." 2005. http://www.waterrating.gov.au/compliance.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A "nutrition label" for privacy

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SOUPS '09: Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security
          July 2009
          205 pages
          ISBN:9781605587363
          DOI:10.1145/1572532

          Copyright © 2009 Copyright held by the author/owner.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 July 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SOUPS '09 Paper Acceptance Rate15of49submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate15of49submissions,31%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader