Don-Yun Chen
ABSTRACT
Since the 1990s, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have become popular instruments for delivering government services, encouraging citizen participation, and improving public trust. However, although governments around the globe have made enormous investments in e-Government initiatives, whether these efforts do indeed promote greater civic engagement is still under fierce debate between those optimistic and those pessimistic about technology's potential to change the way governments interact with the populace. This paper attempts to figure out whether the Internet can encourage civic engagement and whether its effect is "reinforcing" or "mobilizing" by analyzing Taiwanese national survey data.
The findings show that ICTs appear to have a reinforcing, rather than mobilizing effect. These technologies encourage only those people who are already active in so-called real-world civic engagements to interact with their governments online. At the end of this paper, four policy recommendations are proposed, namely: (1) keeping spending resources that could engage people in ways other than technology; (2) allocating more resources to address the digital divide; (3) focusing future e-Government initiatives in Taiwan more strongly on users; and (4) including a synchronized reform in these initiatives between the online interface and offline back-office.
- Norris, P., Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Adler, R. P., and Goggin, J., What Do We Mean By 'Civic Engagement'?, Journal of Transformative Education, 2005, 3, 3: 236--253.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diller, E. C., Citizens in Service: The Challenge of Delivering Civic Engagement Training to National Service Programs. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service, 2001.Google Scholar
- Cooper, T. L., Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century: Toward a Scholarly and Practical Agenda", Public Administration Review, 2005, 65, 5: 534--535.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Putnam, R. D., Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon&Schuster, 2000.Google Scholar
- Barber, B. R., Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy, Political Science Quarterly, 1998, 113, 4: 573--589.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennings, M. K., and Zeitner, V., Internet Use and Civic Engagement, Public Opinion Quarterly, 2003, 67, 3: 311--334.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Skocpol, T., and Fiorina, M. P., Civic Engagement in American Democracy, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Weimann, G., Terror on the Internet: The New Arena, the New Challenges. Washington, DC, The United States Institute of Peace, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chen, Y.-c., and Dimitrova, D. V., Electronic Government and Online Engagement: Citizen Interaction with Government via Web Portals, International Journal of Electronic Government, 2006, 2, 1: 54--76.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Winkel, O., The Democratic Potentials of Interactive Information Technologies under Discussion-Problems, Viewpoints, and Perspectives, International Journal of Communications Law and Policy, 2000/2001 6(winter), in http://www.ijclp.org/6_2001/index.html, Latest update 25 August 2005.Google Scholar
- Gerodimos, R., Democracy and the Internet: Emerging Lessons for the 21st Century Public Sphere, The 54th Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association, 6--8 April 2004. University of Lincoin.Google Scholar
- Norris, P., The Impact of the Internet on Political Activism: Evidence from Europe, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2005, 1, 1: 20--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kim, J.-Y., The Impact of Internet Use Patterns on Political Engagement: A Focus on Online Deliberation and Virtual Social Capital, Information Polity, 2006, 11: 35--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Coleman, S., and Gotze, J., Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation, London: Hansard Society Press, 2002.Google Scholar
- Grossman, L., The Electronic Commonwealth, New York: Penguin, 1995.Google Scholar
- Golding, P, World Wide Wedge: Division and Contradiction in the Global Information Infrastructure, Monthly Review, 1996, 48, 3: 70--85.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hayward, T., Info-rich--info-poor: Access and Exchange in the Global Information Society, London: New Jersey, Bowker-Saur, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carpini, M. X. D., Gen.com: Youth, Civic Engagement, and the New Information Environment, Political Communication, 2000, 17: 341--349.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Park, H. M., The Impact of Digital Government on Civic Engagement: A Typological Approach, Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, San Diego, 21--24 May 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- To reinforce or to mobilize?: tracing the impact of internet use on civic engagement in Taiwan
Recommendations
Bringing e-democracy back in: why it matters for future research on e-governance
Special issue: Jane fountain's "building the virtual state"The author argues that contemporary digital information communication technologies (ICTs) facilitate new forms of e-government-enabled public sector policy making that enshrine some of the important norms and practices of e-democracy. The potential for ...
Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective
Special issue on Open Government and Public Participation: Issues and Challenges in Creating Public ValueWe argue that the Obama Administration's Open Government Initiative blurs distinctions between e-democracy and e-government by incorporating historically democratic practices. now enabled by emerging technology. within administrative agencies. We ...
Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective
dg.o '11: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging TimesWe consider open government (OG) within the context of e-government and its broader implications for the future of public administration. We argue that the current US Administration's Open Government Initiative blurs traditional distinctions between e-...
Comments