skip to main content
10.1145/1147261.1147264acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A participatory design agenda for ubiquitous computing and multimodal interaction: a case study of dental practice

Published:01 August 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reflects upon our attempts to bring a participatory design approach to design research into interfaces that better support dental practice. The project brought together design researchers, general and specialist dental practitioners, the CEO of a dental software company and, to a limited extent, dental patients. We explored the potential for deployment of speech and gesture technologies in the challenging and authentic context of dental practices. The paper describes the various motivations behind the project, the negotiation of access and the development of the participant relationships as seen from the researchers' perspectives. Conducting participatory design sessions with busy professionals demands preparation, improvisation, and clarity of purpose. The paper describes how we identified what went well and when to shift tactics. The contribution of the paper is in its description of what we learned in bringing participatory design principles to a project that spanned technical research interests, commercial objectives and placing demands upon the time of skilled professionals.

References

  1. Binder, T., Brandt, E., Horgen, T. and Zach, G. Staging Events of Collaborative Design and Learning. In Proc. CE 1998, CETEAM (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, B., Cederman-Haysom, T., Donovan, J. and Brereton, M. F. Springboards into design: Exploring multiple representations of interaction in a dental surgery. In Proc. OZCHI 2003, University of Queensland (2003), 14--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cederman-Haysom, T. and Brereton, M. F. Designing usable ubiquitous computing. In Proc. PDC 2004 Vol. 2, ACM Press (2004), 101--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cederman-Haysom, T. and Brereton, M. F. Bridging technical and HCI research: Creating usable ubiquitous computing. In Proc. OZCHI 2004, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eriksén, S. Designing for accountability. In Proc. NordCHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 177--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Good, M. Participatory design of a portable torque-feedback device. In Proc. SIGCHI 1992, ACM Press (1992), 439--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (Eds.) Design At Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Karat, J., Horn, D. B., Halverson, C. A., and Karat, C. M. 2000. Overcoming unusability: developing efficient strategies in speech recognition systems. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 141--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kraal, B. Speech recognition: Considered, confused and contextualised. OzCHI Doctoral Colloquium, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pedersen, J. and Buur, J. Games and movies: Towards innovative codesign with users. In Proc. CoDesigning 2000, Springer (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Robertson, T. Embodied actions in time and place: The cooperative design of a multimedia, educational computer game. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5 (1996), 341--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Schön, D., Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York, NY, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (Eds.) Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sperschneider, W. and Bagger, K. Ethnographic Fieldwork Under Industrial Constraints: Toward design-in-context. In International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 1 (2003), 41--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Suchman, L. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 14, 2 (2002), 91--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Weiser, M. Ubiquitous Computing, http://www.ubiq.com/hypertext/weiser/UbiHome.html, (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Weiser, M. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, 265, 3 (1991), 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A participatory design agenda for ubiquitous computing and multimodal interaction: a case study of dental practice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PDC '06: Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 1
      August 2006
      149 pages
      ISBN:159593460X
      DOI:10.1145/1147261

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 August 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader