skip to main content
10.1145/1029632.1029639acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Simple vs. compound mark hierarchical marking menus

Published:24 October 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a variant of hierarchical marking menus where items are selected using a series of inflection-free simple marks, rather than the single "zig-zag" compound mark used in the traditional design. Theoretical analysis indicates that this simple mark approach has the potential to significantly increase the number of items in a marking menu that can be selected efficiently and accurately. A user experiment is presented that compares the simple and compound mark techniques. Results show that the simple mark technique allows for significantly more accurate and faster menu selections overall, but most importantly also in menus with a large number of items where performance of the compound mark technique is particularly poor. The simple mark technique also requires significantly less physical input space to perform the selections, making it particularly suitable for small footprint pen-based input devices. Visual design alternatives are also discussed.

References

  1. Balakrishnan, R., & MacKenzie, I.S. (1997). Performance differences in the fingers, wrist, and forearm in computer input control. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 303--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Balakrishnan, R., & Patel, P. (1998). The PadMouse: Facilitating selection and spatial positioning for the non-dominant hand. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buxton, W., Chunking and phrasing and the design of human-computer dialogues, in Readings in human-computer interaction: Towards the year 2000, R. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. Buxton, S. Greenberg., Editors. 1986, Morgan Kaufmann. p. 494--499. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Callahan, J., Hopkins, D., Weiser, M., & Shneiderman, B. (1988). An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 95--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kurtenbach, G. (1993). The design and evaluation of marking menus. PhD Thesis thesis. University of Toronto. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kurtenbach, G., & Buxton, W. (1993). The limits of expert performance using hierarchical marking menus. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 35--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kurtenbach, G., & Buxton, W. (1994). User learning and performance with marking menus. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 258--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kurtenbach, G., Fitzmaurice, G.W., Owen, R.N., & Baudel, T. (1999). The Hotbox: efficient access to a large number of menu-items. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 231--237. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sellen, A., Kurtenbach, G., & Buxton, W. (1992). The prevention of mode errors through sensory feedback. Human Computer Interaction. 7(2). p. 141--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Simon, H. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science. 183. p. 482--488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tapia, M., & Kurtenbach, G. (1995). Some design refinements and principles on the appearance and behavior of marking menus. ACM UIST Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. p. 189--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Wiseman, N., Lemke, H., & Hiles, J. (1969). PIXIE: A new approach to graphical man-machine communication. Proceedings of the 1969 CAD Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhai, S., Milgram, P., & Buxton, W. (1996). The influence of muscle groups on performance of multiple degree-of-freedom input. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 308--315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Simple vs. compound mark hierarchical marking menus

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '04: Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2004
      312 pages
      ISBN:1581139578
      DOI:10.1145/1029632

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 October 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader