Ravin Balakrishnan
- 1.Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., & DeRose, T.D. (1993). Toolglass and magic lenses: The see-through interface. Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 73-80, New York: ACM SIGGRAPH. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Bier, E. A., Stone, M. C., Fishkin, K., Buxton, W., & Baudel, T. (1994). A taxonomy of see-through tools. Proceedings of the CHI'94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 358-364, New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Buxton, W., & Myers, B. A. (1986). A study in twohanded input. Proceedings of the CHI'86 Conference in Human Factors in Computing Systems, 321-326, New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.Card, S. K., Moran, T.P., & Newell, A. (1980). The Keystroke-Level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM, 23, 7, 396-410, New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.Fitzmaurice, G. W., & Buxton, W. (1997). An empirical evaluation of graspable user interfaces: towards specialized, space-multiplexed input. Proceedings of CH1"97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 43-50, New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Guiard, Y. (1987). Asymmetric division of labour in human skilled bimanual action: The ldnematie chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 19, 486-517.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7.Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., Patten, L, & Kassell, N. (1997). Cooperative Bimanual Action. Proceedings of the CHI'97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 27-34, New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Hopkins, D. (1991). The design and implementation of pie menus. Dr. Dobbs" Journal, December 1991, 16- 26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.Jacob, R. J. K., Sibert, L. E., McFarlane, D. C., & Mullen, M. P. (1994). Integrality and separability of input devices. A CM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction, 1, 1, 3-26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Kabbash, P., Buxton, W., & SeUen, A. (1994). Twohanded input in a compound task. Proceedings of the CHI'94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 417-423, New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Kurtenbach, G. (1993). The Design and Evaluation of Marking Menus. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Kurtenbach, G., & Buxton, W. (1993). The limits of expert performance using hierarchical marking menus. Proceedings of InterCHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 482-487, New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Kurtenbach, G., Fitzmaurice, G., Baudel, T., & Buxton, W. (1997). The design of a GUI paradigm based on tablets, two-hands, and transparency. Proceedings of the CHI'97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 35-42, New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Nilsen, E. L. (1991). Perceptual-motor control in human-computer interaction. Technical Report NO. 37, Cognitive Science and Machine Intelligence Laboratory, University of Michigan. Google Scholar
- 15.Zeleznik, R. C., Forsberg, A. S., & Strauss, P. S. (1997). Two pointer input for 3D interaction. Proceedings of 1997 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Providence, Rhode Island. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Zhai, S., Smith, B. A., & Selker, T. (1997). Improving browsing performance: A study of four input devices for scrolling and pointing. Proceedings of INTER- ACT'97: The Sixth IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Sydney, Australia. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The PadMouse: facilitating selection and spatial positioning for the non-dominant hand
Recommendations
Mouse 2.0: multi-touch meets the mouse
UIST '09: Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyIn this paper we present novel input devices that combine the standard capabilities of a computer mouse with multi-touch sensing. Our goal is to enrich traditional pointer-based desktop interactions with touch and gestures. To chart the design space, we ...
VisionWand: interaction techniques for large displays using a passive wand tracked in 3D
SIGGRAPH '04: ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 PapersA passive wand tracked in 3D using computer vision techniques is explored as a new input mechanism for interacting with large displays. We demonstrate a variety of interaction techniques and visual widgets that exploit the affordances of the wand, ...
VisionWand: interaction techniques for large displays using a passive wand tracked in 3D
UIST '03: Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyA passive wand tracked in 3D using computer vision techniques is explored as a new input mechanism for interacting with large displays. We demonstrate a variety of interaction techniques that exploit the affordances of the wand, resulting in an ...
Comments