skip to main content
10.1145/1011870.1011883acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The impact of participation in information system design: a comparison of contextual placements

Published:27 July 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

To compare the outcomes of participatory and user-centered contextual design, case study methods and the Activity Checklist derived from Activity Theory are used to analyze two system prototypes developed in the same organizational setting. Systematic differences between the prototypes are identified regarding focus on tool, organization, individual, and relation to current power structures and organizational practices. The resulting participatory design prototype reflected a sharper focus on collective use, social processes and to pragmatically fit into the organization whereas the user-centered prototype focused on individual use, the computer system and solutions that require substantial changes in work procedures. The differences between the prototypes are discussed and related to the specific aspects of the design methods.

References

  1. Beyer H., and K. Holtzblatt. Contextual Design. Morgan Kaufman, New York, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Blomberg J., L. Suchman, and R. Trigg. Reflections on a work-oriented design project. Human-Computer Interaction 11(3), 1996, 123--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bravo E. The Hazards of leaving out the Users, In Schuler D. and Namioka A. (Eds) Participatory Design. Principles and Practices Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1993, 3--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown J, Duguid P. Borderline issues: social and material aspects of design. Human-Computer Interaction 9(1). 1994, 3--36Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buchannan R. Wicked problems in design thinking Design Issues etc. 8(2), 1992, 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Clement A., and Van den Besselaar P. A retrospective look at PD Projects Communications of the ACM, 36(4), 1993, 29--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dittrich Y., Eriksén S., and Hansson C. PD in the Wild; Evolving Practices of Design in Use In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC `02) (Malmö, Sweden June 23--25 2002) CPSR Palo Alto CA, 2002, 124--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehn, P., and Sandberg Å., Local Union Influence on Technology and Work Organization: Some Results from the DEMOS project. In Briefs, U., Ciborra, C. and Schneider, L. (eds.), Systems Design For, With and By the Users. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, 427--437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehn P., Kyng, M. and Sundblad, Y. The Utopia Project: on Training, Technology, and Products viewed from the Quality of Work Perspective. In Briefs, U., Ciborra, C. and Schneider, L. (eds.), Systems Design For, With and By the Users. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, 439--449.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehn, P., and Kyng, M. The collective resource approach to systems design. In Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (Eds.), Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge, Aldershot, UK: Avebury; Brookfield, VT: Gower 1987, 17--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer G., and Ostwald J Seeding, Evolutionary growth, and Reseeding: Enriching Participatory Design with Informed Participation. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC `02) (Malmö, Sweden June 23--25 2002) CPSR Palo Alto CA, 2002, 135--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Floyd, C., Mehl, W.-M., Reisin, F.-M., Schmidt, G., and Wolf, G. Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development. Human-Computer Interaction, 4(4), 1989, 253--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hakim J. and Spitzer T. Effective Prototyping for Usability In Proceedings of IEEE Professional Communication Society International Professional Communication Conference and Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM International Conference on Computer Documentation: Technology & Teamwork (Cambridge, MA), New York: IEEE. 2000, 47--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hirscheim R. Assessing Participatory Systems Design: Some Conclusions from an Exploratory Study, Information and Management, 6 1983, 317--327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hughes J.A., D. Randall, and D. Shapiro. From ethnographic record to system design: some experiences from the field. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): an International Journal, 1(3), 1993, 123--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Irestig M., Pilemalm S., Hallberg N., Eriksson H. and Timpka T. Design of a Prototype Computer Network Service in Large Non-profit Non-governmental Organizations: The case of Labor Union Shop Stewards. Submitted 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaptelinin V., Nardi B. and Macaulay C. The Activity Checklist: A tool for representing the "Space" of Context. Interactions, 6 (4) (July+August, 1999), 27--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kensing F., Simonsen J., and Bødker K. MUST -- a method for participatory design. Human-Computer Interaction 13(2) 1998, 167--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nelander S., Söderlund M. and Ivarsen O. Om klyftor i informationssamhället {On breaches in the information society} LO Report No 51 Stockholm Sweden 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pilemalm S., Hallberg N. and Timpka T. How do shop stewards perceive their situation and tasks? Preconditions for support of union work. Economic and Industrial Democracy: an International Journal, 22(4) 2001, 569--599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pilemalm S., Hallberg N. and Timpka T. From Utopia to DLK -- Management of External Voices in Large Participatory Design Projects. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC `00) (New York NJ Nov 29--Dec 1 2000) CPSR Palo Alto CA, 2000, 156--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribeiro, R., Bunker, R. Prototyping analysis, structured analysis, Prolog and Prototypes. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR Conference on Management of Information Systems Personnel 1988, 109--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rittel H. On the planning crisis: system analysis of the "first and second generation". Bedriftokonomen, no. 8, 390--401, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Spinuzzi C. A Scandinavian Challenge, a US Response: Methodological Assumptions in Scandinavian and US prototyping approaches. Proceedings of SIGDOC 2002 2002, 208--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Vredenburg K., Mao J.-Y., Smith P. and Carey T. Design methods: A survey of user centered design practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Minn. USA 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yin, R. K. Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Sage Publications. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The impact of participation in information system design: a comparison of contextual placements

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              PDC 04: Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - Volume 1
              July 2004
              245 pages
              ISBN:1581138512
              DOI:10.1145/1011870

              Copyright © 2004 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 27 July 2004

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader