ABSTRACT
As technology becomes more embedded in our daily lives, there is a great deal of hope about the use of information technology to achieve positive community outcomes like increasing access to local information, promoting civic engagement, and creating avenues for collaboration and communication. While these technologies provide opportunities for community groups to achieve their own goals, most community computing studies describe community members in fairly passive ways as users of existing systems rather than as meaningful contributors to the design process. The Civic Nexus project is a three year participatory design project that involves working with community groups to increase their capacity to solve local community problems through the use of leading edge computing tools. Our view of participatory design is one in which community members take control of the design process in terms of both directing what should be done and maintaining the technology infrastructure. In this paper, we describe our process of participatory design with three community groups and present associated challenges for designers engaging in participatory design in community computing contexts.
- Balka, E. Participatory design in women's organizations: The social world of organizational structure and gendered nature of expertise. Gender, Work and Organizations 4, 2 (April 1997), 99--115.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Balka, E. Political frameworks for system design: Participatory design in nonprofit women's organizations in Canada and the United States." In J. Gaertner & I. Wagner, (Eds.) Workshop Proceedings: Political Frameworks of System Design From a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Held in conjunction with the Third Decennial Conference: Computers in Context: Joining Forces in Design (Aarhus, Denmark, August 14--18, 1995). Available WWW: http://www.sfu.ca/~ebalka/aarhus.htmGoogle Scholar
- Benston, M. (with E. Balka). Participatory design by nonprofit groups. In Proceedings of the Conference on Participatory Design (PDC '90) (Seattle Washington, March 31 - April 1, 1990). CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, 1990, 107--113.Google Scholar
- Bødker, S. and Burr, J. The design collaboratorium: A place for usability design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 9, 2 (2002), 152--169. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Knudsen, J., Kyng, M. and Madsen, K. Computer support for cooperative design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '88) (Portland, OR, September 26--28, 1988). ACM Press, New York, NY, 1988, 377--394. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S. and Iverson. O. S. Staging a professional participatory design practice: Moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Aarhus, Denmark, October 19--23, 2002). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2002, 11--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S., Nielsen, C., and Petersen, M. G. Creativity, cooperation and interactive design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (New York, NY, August 17--19, 2000). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2000, 252--261. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, J. M. Participatory design of community information systems: The designer as bard. In F. Darses, R. Dieng, C. Simone, & M. Zacklad (Eds.), Cooperative Systems Design (COOP '04). IOS Press, Washington, DC, 2004, 1--6.Google Scholar
- Carroll, J. M., Chin, G., Rosson, M. B., and Neale, D. C. The development of cooperation: Five years of participatory design in the virtual school. In D. Boyarski and W. Kellogg (Eds.), Designing Interactive Systems (SIS '00) (Brooklyn, New York, August 17--19, 2000). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 2000, 239--251. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, J. M., Dunlap, D. R., Isenhour, P. L., Kavanaugh, A., Rosson, M. B. and Schafer, W. Community-based information technology workforce development. In R. Carveth, S. Kretchmer & D. Schuler (Eds.), Shaping the Networked Society. 2003 in press.Google Scholar
- Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B. Better home shopping or new democracy? Evaluating community network outcomes. In Proceedings of CHI 2001: Conference on Human Factors of Computing Systems. (Seattle, WA, March 31 - April 5, 2001). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2001, 372--379. Also published as CHI Letters, 3, 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Cohill, A. M., and Schorger, J. R. Building a history of the blacksburg electronic village. In Proceedings on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, practices, methods, & techniques (Ann Arbor, MI, August 23--25, 1995). ACM Press, New York, NY, 1995, 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Dunlap, D. R, and Isenhour, P. L. Frameworks for sharing knowledge: Toward a professional language for teaching practices. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (HICSS `03) (Kona, HI, January 6--9, 2003). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dewey, J. Reconstruction in Philosophy. Beacon Press, Boston, MA, 1948. (Original work published in 1920)Google Scholar
- Greenbaum, J., and Kyng, M., Eds. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gurstein, M. Effective use: A community informatics strategy beyond the digital divide. First Monday 8, 12 (December 2003). Available WWW: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue8_12/gurstein/index.htmlGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Gurstein, M. Community informatics: Current status and future prospects. Community Technology Review (Winter-Spring, 2002). Available WWW: http://www.comtechreview.org/article.php?article_id=56Google Scholar
- Harris, S. R. PD in ponty: Design-by-doing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Participatory Design (PDC '02) (Malmö, Sweden, June 23--25, 2002). CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, 2002, 278--283.Google Scholar
- Kyng, M. Designing for a dollar a day, In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '88)(Portland, OR, September 26--28, 1988). ACM Press, New York, NY, 1988, 178--188. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McPhail, B., Costantino, T., Bruckmann, D., Barclay, R. and Clement, A. CAVEAT exemplar: Participatory design in a nonprofit volunteer Organization. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7, 3/4 (1998), 223--241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mogensen, P. B. and Shapiro, D. When survival is an issue: PD in support of landscape architecture, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7, 3/4 (1998), 187--203. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Muller, M. J. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.), The Human Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2002, 1051--1068. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pettigrew, K. E., and Durrance, J. C. Public use of digital community information systems: Findings from a recent study with implications for system design. In Proceedings of the First ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Roanoke, VI, June 24--28, 2001). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2001, 136--143. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pettigrew, K. E., Durrance, J. C., and Vakkari, P. Approaches to studying public library Internet initiatives: A review of the literature and an overview of a current study. Library and Information Science Research, 21, 3 (1999), 327--360.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robertson, T. Shoppers and tailors: Participative practices in small australian design companies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7, 3/4 (1998), 205--221. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schuler, D. A Pattern language for living communication. In Proceedings of the Conference on Participatory Design (PDC '02) (Malmö, Sweden, June 23--25, 2002). CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, 2000, 434--436.Google Scholar
- Schuler, D. Community Networks: Building a New Participatory Medium, Communications of the ACM 37, 1 (January, 1994), 38--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schuler. D. and Namioka, A., Eds. Participatory Design: Principles and Practice. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L. Located accountabilities in technology production. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YN, UK, 2000. Available WWW: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/ suchman-located-accountabilities.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Trigg, R. H. From sandbox to "fundbox": Weaving participatory design into the fabric of a busy nonprofit. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC `00) (Palo Alto, CA, November 28 - December 1, 2000). CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, 2000, 174--183.Google Scholar
- Wellman, B. and Haythorthwaite, C. The Internet in Everyday Life. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Participatory design in community computing contexts: tales from the field
Recommendations
Emerging spaces in community-based participatory design: reflections from two case studies
PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1This paper engages with issues of universality and locality in the context of community-based participatory design (PD), and focuses on the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating local views and forms of participation in the design ...
Exploring Participatory Design in Urban Community Gardens
MAB '23: Proceedings of the 6th Media Architecture Biennale ConferenceCommunity gardens are areas that encounter frequent, intricate more-than-human interactions in the built environment. In this paper, we explore the opportunities and challenges of using participatory design methods to establish a dialogue with the ...
Supporting community-based learning: case study of a geographical community organization designing its website
Computer Support for Learning CommunitiesCommunity computing supports human - computer interaction among neighbours in geographical or place-based community organizations. Using a case study of such an organization, we investigate the process of designing their website. Our long-term ...
Comments