skip to main content
10.1145/1579114.1579137acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The application of a physical activity and location measurement system to public health interventions to promote physical activity

Published:09 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

At least 60% of the world's population is not sufficiently active to benefit their health. This can be attributed in part to reduced participation in active leisure pursuits, and an increase in sedentary behavior in the workplace. Another key factor is that walking has declined in recent decades and this is thought to be due to an increase in car use and layout of urban environments which are dominated by cars and so do not appeal to pedestrians [4]. Other aspects of the local environment such as availability of parks and other recreation facilities, land use and transport system can also have a discouraging or alternatively an encouraging influence on walking and other forms of physical activity [6].

As local environment and travel patterns strongly influence physical activity, location context can be a valuable additional source of information when analyzing activity levels and activity patterns. The system described in this paper measures concurrent physical activity and location (GPS) and uses this data to produce measures relating to the following two areas:

• Physical activity at different locations

• Travel (walking and motorized transport)

Information produced is designed to identify:

• Changes in activity levels (general and within certain locations)

• Scope for increased activity in particular settings

• Amount, frequency and intensity of walking and its contribution to travel

• Potential barriers to physical activity.

This can inform individuals of their physical activity levels and provide quantifiable outcomes on the impact of interventions to increase physical activity.

References

  1. A Guide For Population-Based Approaches To Increasing Levels Of Physical Activity: Implementation Of The Who Global Strategy On Diet, Physical Activity And Health. 2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Axhausen KW. 2006. Definition of Movement and Activity for transport modeling. Contribution to the Handbooks in Transport. Transport ModellingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhat CR, Srinivasan S, Guo J. 2001. Activity-Based Travel Demand Modelling for Metropolitan Areas in Texas: Model Components and Mathematical Formulations. University of Texas Center for Transportation Research. Report 4081--2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavill et al. 2007. Building Health Creating and Enhancing Places for Healthy, Active Lives.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Frank LD, Andresen MA, Schmid TL. 2004. Obesity Relationships with Community Design, Physical Activity, and Time Spent in Cars. Am J Prev Med, 27(2)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Frank LD, Engelke PO. 2001. The Built Environment and Human Activity Patterns: Exploring the Impacts of Urban Form on Public Health. J Planning Literature, 16, 202Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Godfrey A, Culhane KM, Lyons GM. 2006. Comparison of the performance of the actvPAL Professional physical activity logger to a discrete accelerometer-based activity monitor. Medical Engineering and Physics: 10.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Grant M, Dall PM, Ryan CG, Granat MH. 2007. Validity of a novel activity monitor as an objective measure of walking in older adults. Proceedings of the 4th World Congress of the Int. Soc. of Phys. Med. and Rehab.; June 11--14; Seoul,; 341.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Grant P M, Ryan C G, Tigbe W W, Granat M H. 2006. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 40:992--997Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Haskell WL et al. 2007. Physical Activity and Public Health. Updated Recommendations for Adults from the ACSM and the AHA. Circulationaha. 107.185649Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jordan AN, Jurca GM, Locke CT, Church TS, Blair SN: 2005. Pedometer indices for weekly physical activity recommendations in postmenopausal women. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 37:1627--1632Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lumsdon L, Mitchell J. 1999. Walking, transport and health: do we have the right prescription? Health Prom. Int.: 14:3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lets make Scotland more active: A Strategy for physical activity. 2003. Physical activity task force. Scottish ExecGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ogilvie D, Egan M, Hamilton V and Petticrew M. 2004. Promoting walking and cycling as an alternative to using cars: systematic review. BMJ, 329, 763Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Oja P, Vuori I. 1999. Promotion of Transport Walking and Cycling in Europe Strategy Directions. UKK Institute for Health Promotion ResearchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Schonfelder S, Samaga U. 2003. Where do you want to go today?-More Observations on Daily Mobility. STRC 03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Scottish Household Survey: Travel Diary 2005/2006; Statistical Bulletin: Transport Series: Apr 2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Scottish Household Survey 2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sport and Leisure General Household Survey 2002; National StatisticsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Matthews CE. 2002. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 34:2045--2051.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams MD, Roy CT, Wolf J, Blasch BB. 2006. Objective Mobility Documentation Using Emerging Technologies. Journal of Visual Impairment and BlindnessGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Wolf J, Guensler R, Bachman W. 2001. Elimination of the Travel Diary: An Experiment to Derive Trip Purpose From GPS Travel Data. Transport Research BoardGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The application of a physical activity and location measurement system to public health interventions to promote physical activity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PETRA '09: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
      June 2009
      481 pages
      ISBN:9781605584096
      DOI:10.1145/1579114

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 June 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader