skip to main content
10.1145/985921.986106acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

WinCuts: manipulating arbitrary window regions for more effective use of screen space

Published:24 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Each window on our computer desktop provides a view into some information. Although users can currently manipulate multiple windows, we assert that being able to spatially arrange smaller regions of these windows could help users perform certain tasks more efficiently. In this paper, we describe a novel interaction technique that allows users to replicate arbitrary regions of existing windows into independent windows called WinCuts. Each WinCut is a live view of a region of the source window with which users can interact. We also present an extension that allows users to share WinCuts across multiple devices. Next, we classify the set of tasks for which WinCuts may be useful, both in single as well as multiple device scenarios. We present high level implementation details so that other researchers can replicate this work. And finally, we discuss future work that we will pursue in extending these ideas.

References

  1. Bly, S.A., Rosenberg, J.K. (1986). A comparison of tiled and overlapping windows. CHI 1986, 101--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hutchings, D.G., Stasko, J. (2002). New operations for display space management and window management. Georgia Institute of Technology Technical Report GIT-GVU-02-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kandogan, E., Schneiderman, B. (1997). Elastic windows: Evaluation of multi-window operations. CHI 1997, 250--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Li, D., Li, R. (2002). Transparent sharing and interoperation of heterogeneous single-user applications. CSCW 2002, 246--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Myers, B.A. (1988). A taxonomy of window manager user interfaces. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 8(5), 65--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Richardson, T., Quentin, S., Wood, K.R., Hopper, A. (1998). Virtual Network Computing. IEEE Internet Computing, 2(1), 33--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Smith, G., Baudisch, P., Robertson, G.G., Czerwinski, M., Meyers, B., Robbins, D., Horvitz, E., Andrews, D. (2003). Groupbar: The taskbar evolved. OZCHI 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Stille, S., Minocha, S., Ernst, R. (1997). An adaptive window management system. INTERACT 1997, 67--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Wickens, C.D., Carswell, C.M. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37, 473--494.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. WinCuts: manipulating arbitrary window regions for more effective use of screen space

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '04: CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2004
        975 pages
        ISBN:1581137036
        DOI:10.1145/985921

        Copyright © 2004 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 April 2004

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader