skip to main content
10.1145/985921.986069acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Mouse ether: accelerating the acquisition of targets across multi-monitor displays

Published:24 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

When acquiring a target located on a different screen, multi-monitor users face a challenge: differences in resolution and vertical and horizontal offsets between screens cause the mouse pointer to get warped, making the attempt to acquire the target difficult. Mouse ether eliminates warping effects by applying appropriate transformations to all mouse move events. In our user study, mouse ether improved participants' performance on a target acquisition task across two screens running at different resolutions by up to 28%. 7 of the 8 participants also strongly preferred using mouse ether to the control.

References

  1. Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Tandler, P, Bederson, B., and Zierlinger, Z. Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: Techniques for Accessing Remote Screen Content on Touch- and Pen-operated Systems. In Proc. Interact'03, pp. 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robertson, G. High-Density Cursor: A Visualization Technique that Helps Users Keep Track of Fast-Moving Mouse Cursors. In Proc. Interact'03, pp.236--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Czerwinski, M., Tan, D. S., & Robertson, G. G. Women Take a Wider View. In Proc. CHI '02, pp. 195--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dulberg, M.S., St. Amant, R., and Zettlemoyer, L.S. An Imprecise Mouse Gesture for the Fast Activation of Controls. In Proc. Interact '99, pp. 375--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Grudin, J. Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. In Proc. of CHI'01, pp. 458--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gutwin, C. Improving focus targeting in interactive fisheye views. In Proc. CHI'02, pp. 267--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. MacKenzie, I.S, Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 1992. 7: pp. 91--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McGuffin, M. and Balakrishnan, R. Acquisition of expanding targets In Proc. CHI'02, pages 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sibert, L.E. and Jacob, R. Evaluation of Eye Gaze Interaction. In Proc. CHI'00, pp. 281--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tan, D.S. and Czerwinski, M. Effects of Visual Separation and Physical Discontinuities when Distributing Information across Multiple Displays. In Proc. Interact'03, pp. 252--255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhai, S., Morimoto, C., and Ihde, S. Manual and gaze input cascaded (MAGIC) pointing. In Proc. CHI'99, pp. 246--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '04: CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2004
    975 pages
    ISBN:1581137036
    DOI:10.1145/985921

    Copyright © 2004 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 24 April 2004

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader