skip to main content
10.1145/3365921.3365934acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using Personalisation to improve User Experience in Public Display Systems with Mobile Interaction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 February 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although public displays installations are easy to attract the attention of passers-by to specific content, they present an issue in targeting the right audience. We envision public displays installations working as platforms in which different interactive applications run with highly personalised content based on personal characteristics and interests of a person attending the public displays. Mobile devices can act as an important interaction tool that complements the public screen, providing a feeling of privacy, but they can also be used to get users' preferences in order to obtain their user profiles. This paper is focused on demonstrating how personalisation can be designed and applied to improve the user experience in public display systems, integrating mobile interaction to potentiate the approach. It describes a public display experiment deployed at a university campus and presents a user study composed of two phases: the system without personalisation and the system with personalisation.

References

  1. Florian Alt, Nemanja Memarovic, Ivan Elhart, et al. 2011. Designing Shared Public Display Networks -- Implications from Today's Paper-Based Notice Areas. In Proc. of 9th Int. Conference Pervasive 2011, 258--275. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21726-5_17Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194: 4--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. John Brooke. 2013. SUS: a retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies 8, 2: 29--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sarah Clinch. 2013. Smartphones and Pervasive Public Displays. IEEE Pervasive Computing 12, 1: 92--95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2013.16Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Pedro Coutinho and Rui José. 2016. Risk Elicitation for User-Generated Content in Situated Interaction. In Proc. of 10th Int. Conf. on Ubiquitous Computing & Ambient Intelligence (UCAmI'16), 481--486. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48746-5_49Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Nigel Davies, Adrian Friday, Peter Newman, Sarah Rutlidge, and Oliver Storz. 2009. Using bluetooth device names to support interaction in smart environments. In Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Mobile systems, applications, and services - Mobisys '09, 151. https://doi.org/10.1145/1555816.1555832Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nigel Davies, Marc Langheinrich, Sarah Clinch, Ivan Elhart, Adrian Friday, Thomas Kubitza, and Bholanathsingh Surajbali. 2014. Personalisation and privacy in future pervasive display networks. In Proc. of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '14), 2357--2366. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557287Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nigel Davies, Marc Langheinrich, Rui Jose, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2012. Open Display Networks: A Communications Medium for the 21st Century. Computer 45, 5: 58--64. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ivan Elhart. 2012. Control and Selection of Content on a Network of Public Displays. In PhD Colloquium, Adjunct Proc. of 10th Int. Conf. on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive'12). http://doi.org=10.1.1.722.305Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Elaine M. Huang, Anna Koster, and Jan Borchers. 2008. Overcoming Assumptions and Uncovering Practices: When Does the Public Really Look at Public Displays? In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Pervasive Computing. Springer-Verlag, 228--243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79576-6_14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rui José, Nuno Otero, Shahram Izadi, and Richard Harper. 2008. Instant Places: Using Bluetooth for Situated Interaction in Public Displays. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 4: 52--57. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2008.74Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Vassilis Kostakos and Timo Ojala. 2013. Public Displays Invade Urban Spaces. IEEE Pervasive Computing 12, 1: 8--13. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2013.15Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Thomas Kubitza, Sarah Clinch, Nigel Davies, and Marc Langheinrich. 2013. Using mobile devices to personalize pervasive displays. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 16, 4: 26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2436196.2436211Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ekaterina Kurdyukova, Stephan Hammer, and Elisabeth André. 2012. Personalization of Content on Public Displays Driven by the Recognition of Group Context. In Proc. third International Joint Conference on Ambient Intelligence (AmI 2012), 272--287. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34898-3_18Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ekaterina Kurdyukova, Mohammad Obaid, and Elisabeth André. 2012. Direct, bodily or mobile interaction? In Proc. of the 11th Int.Conf. on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '12), 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2406367.2406421Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Linda Little and Pam Briggs. 2009. Private whispers/public eyes: Is receiving highly personal information in a public place stressful? Interacting with Computers 21, 4: 316--322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rui Neves Madeira, Pedro Albuquerque Santos, and Nuno Correia. 2014. Building a Platform for Pervasive Personalization in a Ubiquitous Computing World. In Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (MOBIQUITOUS'14), 345--346. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.mobiquitous.2014.258158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rui Neves Madeira, Pedro Albuquerque Santos, André Vieira, and Nuno Correia. 2014. Model-Based Solution for Personalization of the User Interaction in Ubiquitous Computing. In Proc of 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, 311--318. https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC-ScalCom.2014.139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Callum Parker, Judy Kay, Matthias Baldauf, and Martin Tomitsch. 2016. Design implications for interacting with personalised public displays through mobile augmented reality. In Proc. of the 5th ACM Int. Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '16), 52--58. https://doi.org/10.1145/2914920.2915016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pedro Albuquerque Santos, Rui Neves Madeira, and Nuno Correia. 2013. FCT4U -- When Private Mobile Displays Meet Public Situated Displays to Enhance the User Experience. In Proc. IEEE 10th Int Conf. on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing and 2013 IEEE 10th Int. Conf. on Autonomic & Trusted Computing (UIC-ATC '13). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 186--193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC.2013.112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Amy Schade. 2016. Tips for Successful Personalization. In Nielsen Norman Group, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/personalization/. Last access: August 12, 2019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Matthew Sharifi, Terry R. Payne, and Esther David. 2006. Public Display Advertising Based on Bluetooth Device Presence. In Proc. of Mobile Interaction with the Real World workshop at Mobile HCI '06, 52--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Al Takrouri, Antonio Canonico, Layda Gongora, et al. 2007. eyeJOT - A Ubiquitous Context-aware Campus Information System. In Proc. of the Second Int. Conf. on Pervasive Computing and Applications (ICPCA'07), Birmingham, UK, IEEE Press, July 26-27. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4365424/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Desney S. Tan and Mary Czerwinski. 2003. Information Voyeurism: Social Impact of Physically Large Displays on Information Privacy. In CHI'03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (CHI'03), 748. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765967Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Maximilian Teltzrow and Alfred Kobsa. 2004. Impacts of user privacy preferences on personalized systems: a comparative study. In Designing personalized user experiences in eCommerce, Clare-Marie. Karat, Jan O. Blom and John. Karat (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, 315--332. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2148-8_17Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Eleanor Toye, Anil Madhavapeddy, Richard Sharp, et al. 2004. Using Camera-Phones to Interact With Context-Aware Mobile Services. Technical Report UCAM-CL-T, Univ. of Cambridge. http://doi.org/10.1.1.59.721Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tommaso Turchi and Alessio Malizia. 2015. Pervasive Displays in the Wild: Employing End User Programming in Adaption and Re-Purposing. In Proc. of 5th International Symposium on End-User Development (IS-EUD 2015), 223--229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18425-8_20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Roy Want and Bill N. Schilit. 2012. Interactive Digital Signage. Computer 45, 5: 21--24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.169Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Using Personalisation to improve User Experience in Public Display Systems with Mobile Interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MoMM2019: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia
      December 2019
      266 pages

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 February 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader