skip to main content
10.1145/3152771.3156140acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Exploring journalistic values through design: a student perspective

Published:28 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

As journalism grapples with technological disruption, the value of its practices to audiences, and society more broadly, is being questioned. Journalism is underpinned by a strong value system that modern communication platforms sometimes obscure. Yet we know that technology can be designed to support values --- professional and more general human values. In this short paper, we present some initial findings of how students engaged with journalistic values through a human-centred design process. Through researching, designing and reflecting, aspiring journalists explored ideas for technologies that embodied journalistic values. The process revealed value tensions but also perspectives on the design of communication technology.

References

  1. CW Anderson. 2013. Rebuilding the News: Metropolitan Journalism in the Digital Age. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Emily Bell and Taylor Owen. 2017. The Platform Press: How Silicon Valley reengineered journalism. Tow Center for Digital Journalism, New York. Retrieved June 20, 2017 from http://towcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/The_Platform_Press_Tow_Report_2017.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Erling Björgvinsson. 2014. Collaborative design and grassroots journalism: public controversies and controversial publics. In Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy, Pelle Ehn, Elisabet M Nilsson and Richard Topgaard (eds.). MIT Press, 227--255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Alicia Blum-Ross, John Mills, Paul Egglestone, and David Frohlich. 2013. Community media and design: insight journalism as a method for innovation. Journal of Media Practice 14, 3: 171--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Matt Carlson and Nikki Usher. 2016. News startups as agents of innovation: for-profit digital news startup manifestos as metajournalistic discourse. Digital Journalism 4, 5: 563--581.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Clifford Christians and Kaarle Nordenstreng. 2004. Social responsibility worldwide. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19, 1: 3--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gilbert Cockton. 2005. A development framework for value-centred design. In CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1292--1295. Retrieved October 10, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1056899 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mark Deuze. 2005. What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism 6, 4: 442--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Carl DiSalvo, Jonathan Lukens, Thomas Lodato, Tom Jenkins, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2397--2406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Skye Doherty. 2018, in press. Journalism Design: Interactive Technologies and the Future of Storytelling. Routledge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Marcus Foth, Martin Tomitsch, Christine Satchell, and M. Hank Haeusler. 2015. From users to citizens: some thoughts on designing for polity and civics. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction, 623--633. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn, and Alan Borning. 2013. Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, Neelke Doorn, Daan Schuurbiers, Ibo van de Poel and Michael E. Gorman (eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 55--95. Retrieved October 6, 2016 from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mark Hampton. 2009. The fourth estate ideal in journalism history. In The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism, Stuart Allan (ed.). Routledge, Oxon, UK, 3--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tony Harcup and Deirdre O'Neill. 2001. What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies 2, 2: 261--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. William Ernest Hocking. 1947. Freedom of the Press: A Framework of Principle. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaana Hujanen. 2016. Participation and the blurring values of journalism. Journalism Studies 17, 7: 871--880.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jennifer Jacobs. 2017. Technology in defense of democracy. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 23, 3: 5--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nassim JafariNaimi, Lisa Nathan, and Ian Hargraves. 2015. Values as hypotheses: design, inquiry, and the service of values. Design Issues 31, 4: 91--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Christopher A. Le Dantec, Erika Shehan Poole, and Susan P. Wyche. 2009. Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1141--1150. Retrieved January 2, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1518875 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jessica K. Miller, Batya Friedman, Gavin Jancke, and Brian Gill. 2007. Value tensions in design: the value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation's groupware system. In Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work, 281--290. Retrieved August 16, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1316668 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Eli Pariser. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. Penguin UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. David M. Ryfe. 2013. Can Journalism Survive? An Inside Look at American Newsrooms. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. John Steel. 2017. Reappraising journalism's normative foundations. In Rethinking Journalism Again: societal role and public relevance in a digital age, Chris Peters and Marcel Broersma (eds.). Routledge, Oxon, UK, 35--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nick Taylor, David Frohlich, Paul Egglestone, Justin Marshall, John Rogers, Alicia Blum-Ross, John Mills, Mike Shorter, and Patrick Oliver. 2014. Utilising insight journalism for community technology design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2995--3004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring journalistic values through design: a student perspective

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '17: Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction
      November 2017
      678 pages
      ISBN:9781450353793
      DOI:10.1145/3152771

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 November 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      OzCHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate74of157submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader