ABSTRACT
Serious and persuasive games and gamified interactions have become popular in the last years, especially in the realm of behavior change support systems. They have been used as tools to support and influence human behavior in a variety of fields, such as health, sustainability, education, and security. It has been shown that personalized serious and persuasive games and gamified interactions can increase effectivity of supporting behavior change compared to "one-size-fits all"-systems. However, how serious games and gamified interactions can be personalized, which factors can be used to personalize (e.g. personality, gender, persuadability, player types, gamification user types, states, contextual/situational variables), what effect personalization has (e.g. on player/user experience) and whether there is any return on investment is still largely unexplored. This full-day workshop aims at bringing together the academic and industrial community as well as the gaming and gamification community to jointly explore these topics and define a future roadmap.
- Bakkes, S., Tan, C.T., and Pisan, Y. Personalised gaming. Proceedings of The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System, (2012).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bogost, I. Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., and Boyle, J.M. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education 59, 2 (2012), 661--686. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crabb, M. Human cognitive measurement as a metric within usability studies. CHI Extended Abstracts, (2013). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L., and Dixon, D. Gamification: Toward a definition. CHI, (2011).Google Scholar
- Fogg, B.J. Persuasive technology - using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., and Sarsa, H. Does gamification work? -- A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., and Aarts, E. Personalizing persuasive technologies: Explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 77, (2015), 38--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaptein, M., De Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., and Aarts, E. Adaptive persuasive systems: A study of tailored persuasive text messages to reduce snacking. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 2(2), 10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaptein, M.C. Personalized persuasion in ambient intelligence. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 4(3), 279--280. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marczewski, A. Gamification user types 2.0. 2014. http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/AndrzejMarczew ski/20131129/205957/Marczewskis_Gamification_ User_Types_2 0.php.Google Scholar
- Nov, O., and Arazy, O. Personality-targeted design: Theory, experimental procedure, and preliminary results. CHI, (2013).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oinas-Kukkonen, H., and Harjumaa, M. A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. Persuasive Technology, (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oinas-Kukkonen, H. Behavior change support systems: A research model and agenda. Persuasive Technology, (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L., Vassileva, J., and Gerling, K.M. Tailoring persuasive health games to gamer type. CHI, (2013), 2467--2476. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L., and Vassileva, J. Gender and persuasive technology: Examining the persuasiveness of persuasive strategies by gender groups. Persuasive Technology, (2014).Google Scholar
- Orji, R.O. Design for behaviour change: A modeldriven approach for tailoring persuasive technologies. PHD Thesis, University of Saskatechwan (2014).Google Scholar
- Susi, T., Johannesson, M., and Backlund, P. Serious games -- an overview. ELearning 73, 10 (2007), 28.Google Scholar
- Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., and Groner, R. Presence vs. flow in the context of computer games. PRESENCE 2007, (2007).Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, O., and Gal-Oz, A. Deconstructing gamification: Evaluating the effectiveness of continuous measurement, virtual rewards, and social comparison for promoting physical activity. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, (2014), 1--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Personalization in Serious and Persuasive Games and Gamified Interactions
Recommendations
Towards Personality-driven Persuasive Health Games and Gamified Systems
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsPersuasive games and gamified systems are effective tools for motivating behavior change using various persuasive strategies. Research has shown that tailoring these systems can increase their efficacy. However, there is little knowledge on how game-...
Improving the Efficacy of Games for Change Using Personalization Models
There has been a continuous increase in the design and application of computer games for purposes other than entertainment in recent years. Serious games—games that motivate behavior and retain attention in serious contexts—can change the attitudes, ...
Exploring the Influence of Game Framing and Gamer Types on the Effectiveness of Persuasive Games
Persuasive TechnologyAbstractAlthough persuasive games are effective at promoting behaviour change, their effectiveness may be influenced by many factors, which include gamer personality type and game framing. This paper explores the relationship between game framing, gamer ...
Comments