skip to main content
10.1145/2757226.2757243acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Express it!: An Interactive System for Visualizing Expressiveness of Conductor's Gestures

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

A conductor provides a single unified vision of how to interpret and perform music. However, perceiving a conductor's musical intention and expression is quite challenging as they convey information to performers with subtle, nuanced, and highly individualized gestures. This artwork visualizes the conductor's gestures in order to give the audience a better understanding of its expressivity. To represent the expressivity of the gestures, we created motion profiles over eight frames, at 30 frames per second, and compared them to previously modeled gestures using three motion factors, called Weight, Space and Time from related concepts in Laban Movement Analysis (LMA). Based on this, we have created a real-time, interactive visualization that is driven by the motion factor parameters. The visualization receives the input video stream, and it is transformed into a representation of the three motion factors extracted from the real-time conducting gestures.

References

  1. Ashley, R. The pragmatics of conducting: Analyzing and interpreting conductors' expressive gestures. In Sixth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, ICMPC'00 (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Buck, B., MacRitchie, J., and Bailey, N. J. The interpretive shaping of embodied musical structure in piano performance. Empirical Musicology Review 8, 2 (2013), 92--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Camurri, A., Volpe, G., Poli, G. D., and Leman, M. Communicating expressiveness and affect in multimodal interactive systems. IEEE Multimedia 12, 1 (2005), 43--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cox, D. J. Astral Projection: Theories of Metaphor, Philosophies of Science, and the Art of Scientific Visualization. PhD thesis, University of Plymouth, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Devendorf, L., and Ryokai, K. AnyType: provoking reflection and exploration with aesthetic interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2013), 1041--1050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Forbes, A. G., Höllerer, T., and Legrady, G. Generative fluid profiles for interactive media arts projects. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Computational Aesthetics, CA'13, ACM (2013), 37--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gambetta, C. L. Conducting outside the box: Creating a fresh approach to conducting gesture through the principles of Laban Movement Analysis. D.m.a., University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. James, J., Ingalls, T., Qian, G., Olsen, L., Whiteley, D., Wong, S., and Rikakis, T. Movement-based interactive dance performance. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, MM'06 (2006), 470--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jensenius, A. R., Wanderley, M. M., Gody, R. I., and Leman, M. Musical gestures: Concepts and methods in research. Routledge, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanungo, T., Mount, D. M., Netanyahu, N. S., Piatko, C. D., Silverman, R., and Wu, A. Y. An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: Analysis and implementation. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 24, 7 (2002), 881--892. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kendon, A. Do gestures communicate? a review. Research on Language & Social Interaction 27, 3 (1994), 175--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Laban, R. v. The Mastery of Movement on the Stage. Macdonald and Evans, 1950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Latulipe, C., Carroll, E. A., and Lottridge, D. Evaluating longitudinal projects combining technology with temporal arts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '11, ACM (2011), 1835-1844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lau, A., and Moere, A. V. Towards a model of information aesthetics in information visualization. In Information Visualization, 2007. IV'07. 11th International Conference of, IV'07 (2007), 87--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lee, E., Kiel, H., Dedenbach, S., Grüll, I., Karrer, T., Wolf, M., and Borchers, J. iSymphony: An adaptive interactive orchestral conducting system for digital audio and video streams. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '06, ACM (2006), 259--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lee, K. Towards an Improved Baton Technique: The Application and Modification of Conducting Gestures Drawn from the Methods of Rudolf, Green and Saito for Enhanced Performance of Orchestral Interpretations. D.m.a dissertation, The University of Arizona, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, K. Visualizing expressiveness in conducting gestures. Proceedings of the IEEE VIS 2014 Arts Program (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathews, M. V. The radio baton and conductor program, or: Pitch, the most important and least expressive part of music. Computer Music Journal (1991), 37--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. McNeill, D. Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakra, T. A. M. Toward an understanding of musical gesture: Mapping expressive intention with the digital baton. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Media Arts & Sciences, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. O'Brien, H. L., and Toms, E. G. What is user engagement? a conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 59, 6 (2008), 938--955. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Petersen, M.G., I. O. K. P., and Ludvigsen, M. Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, DIS'04 (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sand, P., and Teller, S. Video matching. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Papers, SIGGRAPH '04, ACM (2004), 592--599. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Shiffman, D. Reactive. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Emerging Technologies, SIGGRAPH '04, 22--. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Subyen, P., Maranan, D., Schiphorst, T., Pasquier, P., and Bartram, L. EMVIZ: the poetics of movement quality visualization. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging (2011), 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Veit, M., and Herrmann, S. Model-view-controller and object teams: A perfect match of paradigms. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, ACM (2003), 140--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wakin, D. J. Breaking conductors' down by gesture and body part, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Winkler, T. Making motion musical: Gesture mapping strategies for interactive computer music. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, ICMC'95 (1995), 261--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Wright, M. Open sound control: an enabling technology for musical networking. Organised Sound 10, 3 (2005), 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Express it!: An Interactive System for Visualizing Expressiveness of Conductor's Gestures

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition
      June 2015
      420 pages
      ISBN:9781450335980
      DOI:10.1145/2757226

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      C&C '15 Paper Acceptance Rate23of88submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader