skip to main content
10.1145/2677199.2691608acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing the "Things" of the IoT

Published:15 January 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Building objects that question implicit assumptions of common systems can help to reframe technological artifacts. This work builds on an inexpensive prototyping platform that augments everyday objects in minimal ways as an early move towards engaging with the Internet of Things as a site for contestation in interaction design. These intend to account for a broader understanding of design as generating political objects - design things - that draw from the work of Bruno Latour and Studio Atelier. Finally, it introduces the concept of object ecologies as a way to both analyze existing ecosystems of design objects and generate new, speculative ones.

References

  1. Agre, P. Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide. Erlbaum, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Atelier, Binder, T., Michelis, G. de D., et al. Design Things. The MIT Press, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bleeker, J. Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogost, I. Alien Phenomenology or, What it's Like to Be a Thing. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dunne, A. and Raby, F. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhäuser, Berlin, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Dunne, A. and Raby, F. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dunne, A. Hertzian Tales. MIT Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Design: Cultural probes. interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gaver, W. et al. Enhancing Ubiquitous Computing with User Interpretation. Proc. CHI '07, ACM (2007), 537--546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gaver, W. W. et. al. Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. CHI '03, ACM (2003), 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Heidegger, M. The Thing. In The object reader. Routledge, London; New York, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuznetsov, S. et al. Ceci n'est pas une pipe bombe: Proc CHI '11, ACM (2011), 2375--2384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kuznetsov, S. and Paulos, E. Participatory sensing in public spaces. Proc. DIS '10, ACM (2010), 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Latour, B. We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Royal College of Art (Great Britain). The presence project. Royal College of Art, London, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Weibel, P. and Latour, B. Making things public: atmospheres of democracy: {exhibition}, ZKM, Center for art and media Karlsruhe, 20.03.-03-10.2005. (Mass.): MIT press, Cambridge, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing the "Things" of the IoT

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        TEI '15: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
        January 2015
        766 pages
        ISBN:9781450333054
        DOI:10.1145/2677199

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 January 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        TEI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate63of222submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader