skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557369acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Watching the footwork: second screen interaction at a dance and music performance

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interactive mobile technologies have become part of audience experiences of live performances in terms of both general media sharing and specific (sometimes official) extra content. At the same time, high bandwidth affords streaming of live events to mobile devices. We take advantage of these technologies in our high resolution, panoramic image video stream and study a scenario of audience members viewing the very same live event they are watching on a tablet. The video stream on the tablet is navigational and enables audience members to pan and zoom in the real-time video feed. We studied audience interaction and impressions in three performances of a dance and music show and found distinct uses of the second screen video stream. We emphasize that despite initial reluctance, the observed utilization of the technology opened up for new potential practices. Our study shows how working with perceived conflict in technology can still open up design space for interactive technologies.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1305-sidebyside.mp4

mp4

267.8 MB

References

  1. Auslander, P. Liveness: Performance in a networked culture, 2nd ed. New York, US, Rutledge, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkhuus, L. and Jørgensen, T.. Engaging the crowd: studies of audience-performer interaction. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 2925--2930. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barkhuus, L., and Polichar, V. E. Empowerment through seamfulness: smart phones in everyday life. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 15 (6), 2011, 629--639. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Basapur, S., Harboe, G., Mandalia, H., Novak, A., Vuong, V. and Metcalf, C. Field trial of a dual device user experience for iTV. In Proc. EuroITV 2011, ACM Press (2011), 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Basapur, S., Mandalia, H., Chaysinh, S., Lee, Y., Venkitaraman, N. and Metcalf, C. 2012. FANFEEDS: evaluation of socially generated information feed on second screen as a TV show companion. In Proc. EuroITV 2012. ACM Press (2012), 87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bedwell, B., Schnädelbach, H., Benford, S., Rodden, T., and Koleva, B. In Support of City Exploration. In Proc. CHI 2009. ACM Press (2009), 1171--1180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brown, B., Reeves, S. and Sherwood, S. Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1657--1666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chalmers, M. and Galani, A. Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems. In Proc. DIS 2004, ACM Press (2004), 243--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Courtois, C. and D'heer, E. Second screen applications and tablet users: constellation, awareness, experience, and interest. In Proc. EuroITV 2012, ACM Press (2012), 153--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dayan, D. and Katz, E. Media events: the live broadcasting of history. Harvard University Press, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D'heer, E., Courtois, C. and Paulussen, S. Everyday life in (front of) the screen: the consumption of multiple screen technologies in the living room context. In Proc. EuroITV 2012, ACM Press (2012), 195--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. De Sá, M., Shamma, D. A., Churchill, E. Live Mobile Collaboration for Video Production Design, Guidelines, and Requirements. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, Special issue on Video Interaction, 2013, 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Engström, A. and Perry, M. 2011. "Liveness" in live TV: production, experience and future design. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Esbjörnsson, M., Brown, B., Juhlin, O., Normark, D., Östergren, M. and Laurier. E. Watching the cars go round and round: designing for active spectating. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006) , 1221--1224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ganhör, R. ProPane: fast and precise video browsing on mobile phones. In Proc MUM 2012, ACM Press (2012), article 20, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Holmes, M. E., Josephson, S. and Carney, R. E. Visual Attention to Television Programs With a Second-Screen Application. In Proc ETRA 2012, ACM Press, (2012), 397--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hudelist, M. A. Schoeffmann, K. and Boeszoermenyi, L. Mobile video browsing with a 3D filmstrip. In Proc. ICMR 2013, ACM Press (2013), 299--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jacucci, G. Oulasvirta, A., Ilmonen, T., Evans, T. and Salovaara, A. Comedia: mobile group media for active spectatorship. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 1273--1282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jiang, J., Köhler, J., Williams, C. M., Zaletelj, J., Güntner, G., Horstmann, H., Ren, J., Löffler, J. and Weng, Y. Live: An integrated production and feedback system for intelligent and interactive TV broadcasting. IEEE transactions on broadcasting, first, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Karrer, T., Weiss, M., Lee, E. and Borchers, J. DRAGON: a direct manipulation interface for frame-accurate in-scene video navigation. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 247--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kennedy, L. and Naaman, M. Less talk, more rock: automated organization of community-contributed collections of concert videos. In Proc WWW 2009, ACM Press (2009), 311--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Grabe, M. E., Bracken, C. C. and Ditton, T. B. Presence and Television. The Role of Screen Size. Human Communication Research, 26(1), January 2000, 75--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ludvigsen, M. and Veerasawmy. R. Designing technology for active spectator experiences at sporting events. In Proc. OZCHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 96--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Macq, J.-F., Verzijp, N., Aerts, M., Vandeputte; F. and Six, E. 2011. Demo: Omnidirectional video navigation on a tablet PC using a camera-based orientation tracker. In Proc. Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC 2011), IEEE (2011) , 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Olsen, D. R., Partridge, B. and Lynn, S. Time warp sports for internet television, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 17 (4) December 2010, article no. 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Oppermann, L., Flintham, M., Reeves, S., Benford, S. Greenhalgh, C., Marshall, J., Adams, Farr, J. R. and Tandavanitj, N.. Lessons from Touring a Location-Based Experience. In Proc. of Pervasive Computing, (2011). 232--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Patrikakis, C., Papaoulakis, N., Papageorgiou, P., Pnevmatikakis, A., Chippendale, P., Nunes, M., Cruz, R., Poslad, S. and Zhenchen, W. Personalized Coverage of Large Athletic Events, Multimedia, IEEE, 18 (4), 2012, 18--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rondao-Alface, P., Macq, J.-F. and Verzijp, N. Interactive Omnidirectional Video Delivery: A Bandwidth-Effective Approach. In Bell Labs Technical Journal 16 (4), 2012, 135--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Saltz, D. Z. Live Media: Interactive Technology and Theater. Theatre Topics, 11(2), September 2001, 107--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Schreer, O. Thomas, G., Niamut, O. A. Macq, J.-F., Kochale, A., Batke, J.-M., Ruiz Hidalgo, J. Oldfield, R., Shirley, B. and Thallinger, G. Format-agnostic Approach for Production, Delivery and Rendering of Immersive Media, NEM Summit 2011, Torino, Italy, Sept. 27-29, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Thompson, J. The media and modernity: a social theory of the media. Cambridge, Polity, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Vihavainen, S., Mate, S., Liikkanen, L and Curcio, I.. Video as memorabilia: user needs for collaborative automatic mobile video production. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 651--654. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Vihavainen, S. Mate, S., Seppälä, L., Cricri, F. and Curcio, I. D. D.. We want more: human-computer collaboration in mobile social video remixing of music concerts. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 287--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Wurtzler, S. 1992. She Sang Live, But The Microphone Was Turned Off: The Live, the Recorded and the Subject of Representation. In Altman (Ed.), Sound Theory Sound Practice, New York, Routledge, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yonezawa, T. and Tokuda, H. Enhancing communication and dramatic impact of online live performance with cooperative audience control. In Proc. of the UbiComp 2012, ACM Press (2012), 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Zoric, G., Engstrom, A., Barkhuus, L., Önnevall, E. 2013. Panoramic video: design challenges and implications for content interaction. In Proc. EuroITV, ACM Press (2013),153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Watching the footwork: second screen interaction at a dance and music performance

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader