skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557124acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interface design for older adults with varying cultural attitudes toward uncertainty

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This work reports on the design and evaluation of culturally appropriate technology for older adults. Our design context was Cognitive Testing on a Computer (C-TOC): a self-administered computerized test under development, intended to screen older adults for cognitive impairments. Using theory triangulation of cultural attitudes toward uncertainty, we designed two interfaces (one minimal and one rich) for one C-TOC subtest and hypothesized they would be culturally appropriate for older adult Caucasians and East Asians respectively. We ran an experiment with 36 participants to investigate cultural differences in performance, preference and anxiety. We found that Caucasians preferred the interface with minimal elements (i.e. those essential for the primary task) or had no preference. By contrast, East Asians preferred the rich interface augmented with security and learning support and felt less anxious with it than the minimal.

References

  1. Barber, W., & Badre, A. (1998). Culturability: The merging of culture and usability. Proc. of the 4th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brehmer, M. M. (2011). Usability and the effects of interruption in C-TOC: Self-Administered Cognitive Testing on a Computer. M. Sc thesis. University of British Columbia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (2), 319--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cheung, B. Y., Chudek, M., & Heine, S. J. (2011). Evidence for a sensitive period for acculturation: Younger immigrants report acculturating at a faster rate. Psychological Science, 22 (2), 147--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Choi, B., Lee, I., Kim, J., & Jeon, Y. (2005). A qualitative cross-national study of cultural influences on mobile data service design. In Proc. of CHI 2005 (pp. 661--670). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Clemmensen, T., Hertzum, M., Hornbæk, K., Shi, Q., & Yammiyavar, P. (2009). Cultural cognition in usability evaluation. Interacting with Computers, 21 (3), 212--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in communication science. Human Communication Research, 28, 473--490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cyr, D., Bonanni, C., & ilsever, J. (2004). Design and e-loyalty across cultures in electronic commerce. In Proc. of 6th Int'l Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 351-- 360). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Darke, S. (1988). Anxiety and working memory capacity. Cognition & Emotion, 2(2), 145--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. De Angeli, A., & Kyriakoullis, L. (2006). Globalisation vs. localisation in e-commerce: cultural-aware interaction design. In Proc. of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 250--253). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Frandsen-Thorlacius, O., Hornbæk, K., Hertzum, M.,& Clemmensen, T. (2009). Non-universal usability : A survey of how usability is understood by Chinese and Danish users. In Proc. of CHI 2009 (pp. 41--50). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Heine, S. J. (2007). Cultural Psychology (1sted.). W. W. Norton & Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Abridged). SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jhangiani, I., & Smith-Jackson, T. (2007). Comparison of mobile phone user interface design preferences: perspectives from nationality and disability culture. In Proc. of the 4th Int'l Conference on Mobile Technology, Applications, and Systems (pp. 512--519). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14(3), 201--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lee, I., Choi, G. W., Kim, J., Kim, S., Lee, K., Kim, D., Han, M., Park, S., An, Y. (2008). Cultural dimensions for user experience: cross-country and cross-product analysis of users' cultural characteristics. In Proc. of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conferenceon People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction - Volume 1 (pp. 3--12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Marcus, A. (2010). Cross-cultural user-interface design for work, ho play, and on the way. In ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2010 Courses (pp. 5:1--5:160). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Merritt, S., & Bardzell, S. (2011). Post colonial language and culture theory for HCI4D. In Proc. of CHI 2011, Extended Abstracts (pp. 1675--1680). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and the physical environment. Psychological Science, 17(2), 113--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Nekrasovski, D., Bodnar, A., McGrenere, J., Guimbretière, F., & Munzner, T. (2006). An evaluation of pan & zoom and rubber sheet navigation with and without an overview. In Proc. of CHI 2006 (pp. 11--20). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 46--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Reinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2011). Improving performance, perceived usability, and aesthetic swith culturally adaptive user interfaces. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.,1 8(2), 8:1--8:29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shuper, P. A., Sorrentino, R. M., Otsubo, Y., Hodson, G., & Walker, A. M. (2004). A theory of uncertainty orientation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(4), 460--480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Retrieved from http://ubir.buffalo.edu/xmlui/handle/10477/2895Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tanaka, A., & Yamauchi, H. (2004). Cultural self-construal and achievement goal. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 221--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Gordon B. Davis, & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Walsh, T., Nurkka, P., & Walsh, R. (2010). Cultural differences in smartphone user experience evaluation. In Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (pp. 24:1--24:9). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J. (2011). The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In Proc. of CHI 2011 (pp. 143--146). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interface design for older adults with varying cultural attitudes toward uncertainty

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader