ABSTRACT
This paper focuses on the fifth year of a cross-sectional trend study of enterprise social networking. Several stable patterns are evident--some activities have plateaued, others steadily increase in frequency. The fifth year did see a new development: As social networking companies visibly embraced behavior tracking and targeted advertising, concerns shifted from boundary regulation within personal networks to unsettling evidence of activity monitoring. However, benefits of use continue to outweigh drawbacks.
- Archambault, A. & Grudin, J. 2012. A longitudinal study of Facebook, LinkedIn, & Twitter use. Proc. CHI 2012, 2741--2750. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- boyd, d. 2008. Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. PhD Dissertation, University of California-Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Boyles, J.L., Smith, A. & Madden, M. 2012. Privacy and data management on mobile devices. Pew Internet. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Mobile-Privacy.aspxGoogle Scholar
- Brzozowski, M.J., Sandholm, T. & Hogg, T. 2009. Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media. Proc. GROUP 2009, 61--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burke, M. & Kraut, R. 2013. Using facebook after losing a job: Differential benefits of strong and weak ties. Proc. CSCW 2013, 1419--1430. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burke, M., Kraut, R. & Marlow, C. 2011. Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. Proc. CHI 2011, 571--580. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Constine, J. 2012. Facebook beta launches new mobile ad network using your data to target you with banner ads in other apps. TechCrunch, September 18th. http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/18/facebook-mobile-ad-network/Google Scholar
- DiMicco, J., Geyer, W., Millen, D.R., Dugan, C. & Brownholtz, B. 2009. People sensemaking and relationship building on an enterprise social networking site. Proc. HICSS 2009. IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DiMicco, J.M. & Millen, D.R. 2007. Identity management: Multiple presentations of self in Facebook. Proc. Group 2007, 383--386. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DiMicco, J., Millen, D.R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B. & Muller, M. 2008. Motivations for social networking at work. Proc. CSCW 2008. 711--720. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Efimova, L. & Grudin, J. 2007. Crossing boundaries: A case study of employee blogging. Proc. HICSS'07. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ehrlich, K. & Shami, N. S. 2010. Microblogging inside and outside the workplace. Proc. ICWSM 2010. AAAI.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellison, N., Vitak, J., Steinfield, C., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. 2011. Negotiating privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment. In S. Trepte and L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online, 19--32. Springer.Google Scholar
- Facebook Inc. 2013. First Quarter 2013 Results. http://investor.fb.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=761090Google Scholar
- Farnham, S. & Churchill, E. 2011. Faceted identity, faceted lives: Social and technical issues with being yourself online. Proc. CSCW 2012, 359--368. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Farzan, R., DiMicco, J.M., Millen, D.R., Brownholtz, B., Geyer, W. & Dugan, C. 2008. Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise. Proc. CHI 2008, 563--572. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fogel, J. & Nemad, E. 2009. Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1, 153--160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., Masli, M., Daly, E. & Millen, D.R. 2011. An open, social microcalendar for the enterprise: Timely Proc. CHI 2011, 247--256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geyer, W., Dugan, C., DiMicco, J., Millen, D.R., Brownholtz, B. & Muller, M. 2008. Use and reuse of shared lists as a social content type. Proc. CHI 2008, 1545--1554. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Good, N., Dhamija, R., Grossklags, J., Thaw, D., Aronowitz, S., Mulligan, D. & Konstan, J. 2005. Stopping spyware at the gate: A user study of privacy, notice, and spyware. Proc. SOUPS 2005, 43--53. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hargittai, E. 2007. Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 1, article 14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hogan, B. 2010. The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Sci Technol Soc, 30, 377--386.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kairam, S., Brzozowski, M., Huffaker, D. & Chi. E. 2012. Talking in circles: Selective sharing in Google+. Proc. CHI 2012, 1065--1074. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lampe, C., Ellison, N. & Steinfield. 2006. A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proc. CSCW 2006, 167--170. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lampe, C., Ellison, N. & Steinfield. 2008. Changes in use and perception of Facebook. Proc. CSCW 2008, 721--730. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lampe, C., Vitak, J., Gray, R. & Ellison, N. 2012. Perceptions of facebook's value as an information source. Proc. CHI 2012, 3195--3204. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laporte, N. 2013. Why TV execs are still skeptical of Twitter's power to attract eyeballs. Fast Company. http://www.fastcompany.com/3019669/Google Scholar
- Lin, J., Amini, S., Hong, J.I., Sadeh, N., Lindqvist, J. & Zhang, J. 2012. Expectation and purpose: understanding users' mental models of mobile app privacy through crowdsourcing. Proc. Ubicomp 2012, 501--510. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miles, M. B. & Huberman. A. M. 1999. Qualitative data analysis. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Naaman, M., Boase, J. & Lai, C.H. 2010. Is it really all about me? Message content in social awareness streams. Proc. CSCW 2010, 189--192. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Page, X., Kobsa, A. & Knijnenburg, B.P. 2012. Don't disturb my circles! Boundary preservation is at the center of location-sharing concerns. Proc. ICWSM 2012, 266--273. AAAI.Google Scholar
- Raynes-Goldie, K. 2010. Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday, 15, 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rooksby, J. & Sommerville, I. 2012. The management and use of social network sites in a government Dept.. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21, 4--5, 397--415. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Skeels, M. & Grudin, J. 2009. When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. Proc. Group 2009, 95--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, A. & Brenner, J. 2012. Twitter use 2012. Pew Internet. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/TwitterUse-2012/Findings.aspxGoogle Scholar
- Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J.M., Ellison, N.B. & Lampe, C. 2009. Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. Proc. Communities and Technology 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stutzman, F. & Hartzog, W. 2012. Boundary regulation in social media. Proc. CSCW 2012, 769--778. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thom, J. & Millen. D.R. 2012. Stuff IBMers say: Microblogs as an expression of organizational culture. Proc. ICWSM 2012. AAAI.Google Scholar
- Thom-Santelli, J. & Millen, D. 2009. Learning by seeing: Photo-viewing in the workplace. Proc. CHI 2009, 2081--2090. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Treem, J. & Leonardi, P. 2012. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication yearbook, 36, 143--189.Google Scholar
- Tufekci, Z. 2012. Youth and privacy in public networks. Proc. ICWSM 2012, 338--345. AAAI.Google Scholar
- Turner, T., Qvarfordt, P., Biehl, J.Y., Golovchinsky, G., & Back, M. 2010. Exploring the workplace communication ecology. Proc. CHI 2010, 841--850. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Voida, A., Harmon, E. & Al-Ani, B. 2012. Bridging between organizations and the public: Volunteer coordinators' uneasy relationship with social computing. Proc. CHI 2012, 1967--1976. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, Y. & Kobsa, A. 2009. Privacy in online social networking at the workplace. Proc. CSE 2009, 975--978. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, Y., Norcie, G., Komandura, S., Acquisti, A. Leon, P.G. & Cranor, L. 2011. "I regretted the minute I pressed share": A qualitative study of regrets on Facebook. Proc. SOUPS 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D. & Graham, L. T. 2012. A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 3, 203--220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Woelfer, J. & Hendry, D. 2012. Homeless young people on social network sites. Proc. CHI 2012. 2825--2834. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wu, A., DiMicco, J. & Millen, D.R. 2010. Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site. Proc. CHI 2010, 1955--1964. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Cody, J. & Wu, Y. 2010. A case study of micro-blogging in the enterprise: Use, value, and related issues. Proc. CHI 2010, 123--132. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhao, D. & Rosson, M.B. 2009. How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. Proc. GROUP 2009, 243--252. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Creepy but inevitable?: the evolution of social networking
Recommendations
The Social Structuration of Six Major Social Media Platforms in the United Kingdom: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, Google+ and Pinterest
SMSociety '16: Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & SocietySociological studies on the Internet have often examined digital inequalities. These studies show how Internet access, skills, uses and outcomes vary between different population segments. However, we know more about social inequalities in general ...
Acceptability of Social Media Use in Out-of-Class Faculty-Student Engagement
In this exploratory study, higher education faculty perceptions regarding acceptability of social media use for out-of-class student engagement are identified. Hypotheses are developed and tested using a survey to address the impact of factors such as ...
It's All About the (Social) Network
Not all social networks have the same level of maturity or provide the same features, but they share one thing in common: too small a network makes the system uninteresting and too large a network makes it overbearing. These systems need to help users ...
Comments