ABSTRACT
In order to bring about innovation within a community-based context, different stakeholder communities often need to be engaged so that they may appropriately take part in the design process. The 'invisible' work of engagement is frequently overlooked, and yet it plays an important, often pivotal role within many design-based research projects. It revolves around negotiations with a series of stakeholder communities in the design setting and ethnographic understandings of the site and community. Insights and accounts are offered based upon practical experience: existing methodologies and engagement strategies are expanded upon. Our research has shown that understanding and employing community engagement strategies is key to the creation of a network of successfully civilly-engaged stakeholders. Failure to instigate such civil engagement appropriately can endanger the project, as the research 'turns' upon this. We present the approaches taken and critically understand the role of community engagement within the design process, with the purpose of enabling designers and other practitioners to appreciate the role that community engagement plays in systems design and the practical implications this might have for it. This research proceeds from a long-term project in which researchers explored community engagement within the context of design.
- Crabtree, A. (1998): "Ethnography in Participatory Design", Proceedings of the 1998 Particpatory Design Conference, pp. 93--105, Computer Professionals for Social ResponsibilityGoogle Scholar
- Bannon, L. (1991): From Human Factors to Human Actors: The Role of Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction Studies in Systems Design. Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M. (eds.) Design at work.: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 25--44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Voss, Hartswood, Ho, Procter, Slack, Rouncefield, Buescher (eds) (2007): Configuring user-designer relations: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grudin, J. (1990): The computer reaches out. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Seattle, Washington, 261--268. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chamberlain, A., Crabtree, A., Davies, M., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., Valchovska, S and Glover, K (2012): Fresh and local: the rural produce market as a site for co-design, ubiquitous technological intervention and digital-economic development. MUM 2012, Ulm, Germany, ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S. (2008): Design for reconfiguration. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication, ACM SIGDOC, ACM Press, pp. 263--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robertson, T. and J. Simonsen (2012): "Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Participatory Design," Design Issues, Vol. 28, No. 3, MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Chamberlain, A., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Jones, M & Rogers, M. (2012): Research in the wild: understanding 'in the wild' approaches to design and development. Conference on Designing Interactive Systems 2012 ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brown, B., Reeves, S. and Sherwood, S. (2011): Into the wild. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver, Canada, 1157--1666. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bødker, S. and Iversen, O. S. (2002): Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer interaction, NordiCHI '02, vol. 31. ACM.. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Black, Rachel (2012): Porta Palazzo: The Anthropology of an Italian Market. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Buxton, B. (2007): Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bucciarelli, Louis L. (1984): Reflective practice in engineering design. Design Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, MIT Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. (1987): The collective resource approach to system design. In Computers and Democracy - a Scandinavian Challenge, G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng, Eds. Avebury, Aldershot, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar
- Hayes, G. R. (2011): The relationship of action research to human computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 18, 3, Article 15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Checkland, P. and Poulter, J. (2006): Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners, copyright of John Wiley and Sons Limited.Google Scholar
- Harper, R. H. R, (2000): The Organisation in Ethnography - A Discussion of Ethnographic Fieldwork Programs in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Journal of Collaborative Computing -- JCSCW 9(2), Springer Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Garfinkel, H. (1967): Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Johannessen, L. K. and Ellingsen, G. (2012): "Lightweight Design Methods in Integrated Practices", Design Issues, Vol. 28, No. 3, MIT Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Greenberg, S. and Buxton, B. (2008): Usability considered harmful (some of the time). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Florence, Italy. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glass, R., "Agile Versus Traditional: Make Love, Not War," Cutter IT Journal, Dec. 2001.Google Scholar
- Sommerville, I. (2007): Software Engineering, 8th edition, Addison -- Wesley.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Community engagement for research: contextual design in rural CSCW system development
Recommendations
Wild food practices: understanding the wider implications for design and HCI
UbiComp '13 Adjunct: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publicationEthnographic studies in their many forms have played a major role in informing the design and development of a multitude of systems, from pervasive games to ubiquitous systems that support market traders. This paper presents an alternative response to ...
Landscapes of Practice: Bricolage as a Method for Situated Design
This paper proposes a `bricolage' approach to designing systems for cooperative work. This involves users, participatory designers and ethnographers in a continuing cycle of design and revised work practice, often in settings where resources are limited ...
Bridging Work Practice and System Design: Integrating Systemic Analysis, Appreciative Intervention and Practitioner Participation
This article discusses the integration of work practice and system design. By scrutinising the unfolding discourse of workshop participants the co-construction of work practice issues as relevant design considerations is described. Through a mutual ...
Comments