skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468723acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Performative experience design

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper categorises key HCI literature that engages with performance theory or practice according to a taxonomy that puts the user at the centre of the analysis. This taxonomy reveals three strands of research that use performance to address HCI and interaction design at the most fundamental level. We use these strands of research to map out what we have identified as the emerging field of Performative Experience Design. This field, which lies between HCI and performance studies, presents an extraordinarily rich potential for the design of interactive systems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

alt0175-file3.mp4

mp4

7.8 MB

References

  1. Austin, J.L. How to Do Things With Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benford, S., Crabtree, A., Reeves, S., Sheridan, J., Dix, A., Flintham, M. and Drozd, A. The frame of the game: Blurring the boundary between fiction and reality in mobile experiences. Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 427--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Giannachi, G., Walker, B., Marshall, J. and Rodden, T. Uncomfortable interactions. Proc. CHI 2012, ACM (2012), 2005--2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Benford, S. and Giannachi, G. Performing Mixed Reality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Benford, S. and Giannachi, G. Interaction as performance. interactions 19, 3 (May 2012), 38--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boal, A. Theatre of the Oppressed. Pluto, London, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. Gender Trouble. Taylor & Francis eLibrary, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Corness, G., Carlson, K. and Schiphorst, T. Audience empathy: A phenomenological method for mediated performance. Proc. C&C 2011, ACM (2011), 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dalsgaard, P. and Hansen, L.K. Performing perception--staging aesthetics of interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15, 3 (1 Nov. 2008), 1--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Davis, M. Theoretical foundations for experiential systems design. Proc. ETP 2003, ACM (2003), 45--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dix, A., Sheridan, J., Reeves, S., Benford, S. and O'Malley, C. Formalising performative interaction. Proc. DSVIS 2005, Springer-Verlag (2006), 15--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ehn, P., Binder, T., Eriksen, M.A., Jacucci, G., Kuutti, K., Linde, P., et al Opening the digital box for design work: Supporting performative interactions, using inspirational materials and configuring of place. In: N. Streitz, A. Kameas and I. Mavrommati, eds. The Disappearing Computer. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2007), 50--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. England, D., Edmonds, E., Sheridan, J.G., Pobiner, S., Bryan-Kinns, N., Wright, P., Twidale, M. and Diana, C. Digital arts and interaction (invited). Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 609--612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Fernaeus, Y. and Tholander, J. Designing for programming as joint performances among groups of children. Interacting with Computers 18, 5 (Sep. 2006), 1012--1031. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fischer-Lichte, E. The Transformative Power of Performance. Routledge, London, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Forlizzi, J. and Battarbee, K. Understanding experience in interactive systems. Proc. DIS 2004, ACM Press (2004), 261--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Frohlich, D. Audiophotography. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston and London, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Geigel, J. and Schweppe, M. Theatrical storytelling in a virtual space. Proc. SRMC 2004, ACM (2004), 3946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hansen, L.K., Rico, J., Jacucci, G., Brewster, S. and Ashbrook, D. Performative interaction in public space. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 49--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hoven, E.v.d. and Eggen, B. Informing augmented memory system design through autobiographical memory theory. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 12, 6 (2007), 433--443. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jääsko, V. and Mattelmäki, T. Observing and probing. Proc. DPPI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 126--131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jacucci, C. Guiding design with approaches to masked performance. Interacting with Computers 18, 5 (Sep. 2006), 1032--1054. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jacucci, C., Jacucci, G., Wagner, I. and Psik, T. A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media. Proc. CC 2005, ACM (2005), 19--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jacucci, G. Interaction as Performance: Cases of Configuring Physical Interfaces in Mixed Media. Doctoral thesis. University of Oulu, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Chalambalakis, A., Morrison, A., Liikkanen, L., Roveda, S. and Bertoncini, M. Bodily explorations in space: Social experience of a multimodal art installation. Proc. INTERACT 2009, Springer-Verlag (2009), 62--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kuhn, A. Memory texts and memory work: Performances of memory in and with visual media. Memory Studies 3, 4 (2010), 298--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kuutti, K., Iacucci, G. and Iacucci, C. Acting to know: Improving creativity in the design of mobile services by using performances. Proc. C&C 2002, ACM Press (2002), 95--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Laurel, B. Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Leong, T.W., Gaye, L., Tanaka, A., Taylor, R. and Wright, P.C. The user in flux: Bringing HCI and digital arts together to interrogate shifting roles in interactive media. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 45--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Loke, L., Robertson, T. and Mansfield, T. Moving bodies, social selves: Movement-oriented personas and scenarios. Proc. OZCHI 2005, CHISIG of Australia (2005), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Loke, L. and Robertson, T. Studies of dancers: Moving from experience to interaction design. International Journal of Design 4, 2 (Aug. 2010), 3954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Macaulay, C., Jacucci, G., O'Neill, S., Kankaineen, T. and Simpson, M. The emerging roles of performance within HCI and interaction design. Interacting with Computers 18, 5 (Sep. 2006), 942--955. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mehto, K., Kantola, V., Tiitta, S. and Kankainen, T. Interacting with user data--Theory and examples of drama and dramaturgy as methods of exploration and evaluation in user-centered design. Interacting with Computers 18, 5 (Sep. 2006), 977--995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Newell, A., Morgan, M., Gregor, P. and Carmichael, A. Theatre as an intermediary between users and CHI designers. Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 111--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Newell, A.F., Carmichael, A., Morgan, M. and Dickinson, A. The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interacting with Computers 18, 5 (Sep. 2006), 996--1011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Norman, D.A. Foreword. In: B. Laurel, Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, MA (1993), xi-xv. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Redström, J. Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Design Studies 27, 2 (Mar. 2006), 123--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C. and Fraser, M. Designing the spectator experience. Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 741--750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Rico, J., Jacucci, G., Reeves, S., Hansen, L.K. and Brewster, S. Designing for performative interactions in public spaces. Proc. Ubicomp 2010 Adjunct, ACM Press (2010), 519--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Robertson, A., Lycouris, S. and Johnson, J. An approach to the design of interactive environments, with reference to choreography, architecture, the science of complex systems and 4D design. IJPADM 3, 2--3 (2007), 281--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Robertson, T. and Loke, L. Designing situations. Proc. OZCHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Rodríguez, J., Diehl, C. and Christiaans, H. Gaining insight into unfamiliar contexts: A design toolbox as input for using role-play techniques. Interacting with Computers 18, 5 (Sep. 2006), 956--976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Salvador, T. and Howells, K. Focus troupe: Using drama to create common context for new product concept end-user evaluations. Proc. CHI 1998, ACM Press (1998), 251--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Schechner, R. Performance Theory. Routledge, New York, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Schiphorst, T., Calvert, T., Lee, C., Welman, C. and Gaudet, S. Tools for interaction with the creative process of composition. Proc. CHI 1990, ACM Press (1990), 167--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Shedroff, N. Experience Design. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Sheridan, J.G. Digital Live Art: Mediating Wittingness in Playful Arenas. Doctoral Thesis. Lancaster University, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Sheridan, J.G. and Bryan-Kinns, N. Designing for performative tangible interaction. International Journal of Arts and Technology 1, 3 (2008), 288--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Simsarian, K.T. Take it to the next stage: The roles of role playing in the design process. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2003, ACM (2003), 1012--1013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Spence, J., Andrews, S. and Frohlich, D.M. Now, where was I? Negotiating time in digitally augmented autobiographical performance. Journal of Media Practice 13, 3 (forthcoming).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor, R., Boulanger, P., Olivier, P. and Wallace, J. Exploring participatory performance to inform the design of collaborative public interfaces. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2009, ACM (2009), 3721--3726. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Taylor, R., Boulanger, P. and Olivier, P. dream.Medusa: A participatory performance. Proc. SG '08, Springer-Verlag (2008), 200--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Taylor, R., Schofield, G., Shearer, J., Wallace, J., Wright, P., Boulanger, P. and Olivier, P. Designing from within: humanaquarium. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1855--1864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. ten Bhömer, M., Helmes, J., O'Hara, K. and Hoven, E.v.d. 4Photos: A collaborative photo sharing experience. Proc. NordiCHI 2010, ACM (2010), 52--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. van Doorn, M., van Loenen, E. and de Vries, A. Deconstructing ambient intelligence into ambient narratives: The intelligent shop window. Proc. Ambi-Sys 2008, ICST (2008), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. van Doorn, M. and de Vries, A. Co-creation in ambient narratives. In: Y. Cai and J. Abascal, eds. Ambient Intelligence in Everyday Life. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg (2006), 103--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Wakkary, R., Schiphorst, T. and Budd, J. Crossdressing and border crossing: Exploring experience methods across disciplines. Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1709--1710. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Wallis, M., Popat, S., McKinney, J., Bryden, J. and Hogg, D.C. Embodied conversations: Performance and the design of a robotic dancing partner. Design Studies 31, 2 (Mar. 2010), 99--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Williamson, J.R. and Hansen, L.K. Designing performative interactions in public spaces. Proc. DIS 2012, ACM Press (2012), 791--792. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Wu, Q., Boulanger, P., Kazakevich, M. and Taylor, R. A real-time performance system for virtual theater. Proc. SMVC 2010, ACM Press (2010), 3--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Performative experience design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3360 pages
      ISBN:9781450319522
      DOI:10.1145/2468356

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader