skip to main content
10.1145/2361276.2361287acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adapting the disciplinary commons model for high school teachers: improving recruitment, creating community

Published:09 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Disciplinary Commons (DC) is a model of teacher professional development that encourages members of the group to reflect upon their teaching practices, develop a community, and, more broadly, to become more scholarly about their teaching. The DC involves a series of monthly meetings where university faculty members examine their course in detail while producing a course portfolio. Evaluation of the early DC's suggests that they successfully created a sense of community and sharing among the participants. We have adapted the original model to a new audience, high school computing teachers. The adapted model maintains the key aspects of the original model while adding two new, important goals for this new audience: improving recruitment and creating community. The high school teacher audience particularly needed strategies for recruiting students and was in greater need of community. We present evaluation evidence suggesting that we achieved the design goals in a replicable model, including a substantial increase (over 300%) in recruiting students.

References

  1. Fincher, S. and Tenenberg, J. Warren's question. In Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research (Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2007). ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tenenberg, J. and Fincher, S. Opening the door of the computer science classroom: the Disciplinary Commons. SIGCSE Bull., 39, 1 2007, 514--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Seldin, P., Miller, J. E., Seldin, C. A. and McKeachie, W. The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Jossey-Bass, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Yellin, J. M., Huang, Y., Turns, J., & Tsuruda, C. Teaching portfolios in academia: How are they used?. Chicago, IL 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hutchings, P. The Course Portfolio: How Faculty Can Examine Their Teaching To Advance Practice and Improve Student Learning. American Association for Higher Education, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ni, L., Guzdial, M., Tew, A. E., Morrison, B. and Galanos, R. Building a community to support HS CS teachers: the disciplinary commons for computing educators. In Proceedings of the 42nd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (Dallas, TX, USA, 2011). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ericson, B., Guzdial, M. and Biggers, M. Improving secondary CS education: progress and problems. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (Covington, Kentucky, USA, 2007). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Wilson, C., Sudol, L., Stephenson, C. and Stehlik, M. Running on Empty: The Failure to Teach K-12 Computer Science in the Digital Age. http://www.acm.org/runningonempty/fullreport.pdf Association for Computing Machinery & Computer Science Teachers Association, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis-Unger, A. and Maring, B. L. Disciplinary Commons: Brief Summary. http://depts.washington.edu/comgrnd/leaders/OEADiscCommonsEval09.docx, University of Washington, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Maring, B. L. and Davis-Unger, A. Disciplinary Commons Follow-Up Survey Evaluation Report. http://depts.washington.edu/comgrnd/leaders/DiscCommons_FollowUpSurveyReport_FINAL.docx, University of Washington, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis-Unger, A. and Maring, B. L. Disciplinary Commons 2009-2010 Evaluation Report. http://depts.washington.edu/comgrnd/leaders/DiscCommons_2011_EvalReport_R1.pdf, University of Washington, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ni, L. Building professional identity as computer science teachers: supporting secondary computer science teachers through reflection and community building. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research (Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 2011). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ni, L. and Guzdial, M. Who AM I?: understanding high school computer science teachers' professional identity. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 2012). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Cross, J. E., Dickmann, E., Newman-Gonchar, R. and Fagan, J. M. Using mixed-method design and network analysis to measure development of interagency collaboration. American Journal of Evaluation, 30, 3 2009, 310--329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Adapting the disciplinary commons model for high school teachers: improving recruitment, creating community

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICER '12: Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research
      September 2012
      174 pages
      ISBN:9781450316040
      DOI:10.1145/2361276

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      ICER 2024
      ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
      August 13 - 15, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader