skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2318043acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Value biases of sensor-based assistive technology: case study of a GPS tracking system used in dementia care

Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We investigate a conventional GPS tracking system employed in professional dementia care in search of value biases that contradict central care values. The investigation follows the formal steps of the value-sensitive design approach. Four biases are identified. These are related to: augmentation, privacy, self-esteem, and trust and accountability. Drawing on data gathered through a field experiment and related focus group meetings, professional stakeholders' responses and attitudes towards these biases are accounted for. The main lessons learned form our investigation are as follows: Firstly, this study highlights the situation that stakeholders' concerns about sensor-based assistive technology in dementia care often relate to specific value-laden design aspects or features. Secondly, we consider the identified biases central issues that need to be taken into account in ethical evaluations of the uptake and adoption of sensor-based technologies in dementia care. For designers of assistive technologies the biases identified represent areas for improvements. Thirdly, the study strengthens the argument that ethics and human values need to be paid explicit attention as part of human-centered design processes that target the care sector.

References

  1. Allan, K. Communication and consultation: Exploring ways for staff to involve people with dementia in developing services Bristol, UK: The Policy Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Astell, A. REAFF - A framework for developing technology to address the needs of people with dementia In Proc. of First International Workshop on Reminiscence Systems, Cambridge, UK, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Astell, A. Technology and personhood in dementia care. Quality in Ageing, 7 (1). 15--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheston, R. and Bender, M. Understanding Dementia: The Man with the Worried Eyes. Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd., London, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellul, J. The Technological Bluff. Grand Rapids, MI, USA: Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellul, J. The technological society (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Epp, T. D. Person-centred dementia care: A vision to be refined. The Canadian Alzheimer Disease Review, 5 (3). 14--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Faucounau, V., Riguet, M., Orvoen, G., Lacombe, A., Rialle, V., Extra, J. and Rigaud, A. S. Electronic tracking system and wandering in Alzheimer's disease: A case study. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 52 (7--8). 579--587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Florman, S. C. The civilized engineer. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman, B. and J., G. Trust and accountability: preserving human values in interactional experience. In CHI 98 conference summary, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1998, 213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Friedman, B. and Kahn, P. Human values, ethics and design. in Jacko, J. and Sears, A. eds. The human-computer interaction handbook, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 2003, 1177--1201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. and Borning, A. Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. Technical Report 02-12-01, Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Washington, Seattle, WA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedman, B. and Nissenbaum, H. Bias in Computer System. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14 (3). 330--347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hughes, J. C. and Louw, S. J. Electronic tagging of people with dementia who wander - Ethical considerations are possibly more important than practical benefits. British Medical Journal, 325. 847--848.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hughes, J. C., Newby, J., Louw, S. J., Campbell, G. and Hutton, J. L. Ethical Issues and Tagging in Dementia: A Survey. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, 3 (1). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kitwood, T. Cultures of care: tradition and change. in Benson, S. and Kitwood, T. eds. The New Culture of Dementia Care, Hawker, London, UK, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kitwood, T. Dementia reconsidered: the person comes first. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Landau, R., Auslander, G. K., Werner, S., Shoval, N. and Heinik, J. Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia? Aging mental health, 15 (1). 78--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Landau, R., Werner, S., Auslander, G. K., Shoval, N. and Heinik, J. Attitudes of Family and Professional Care-Givers towards the Use of GPS for Tracking Patients with Dementia: An Exploratory Study. British Journal of Social Work, 39 (4). 670--692.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Marr, J. Electronic tagging. Nursing Standards, 4 (9). 54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Meiland, F., Dröes, R.-M., Sävenstedt, S., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. and Andersson, A.-L. Supporting People with Dementia Using Pervasive Health Technologies Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, 2010, 79--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Müller, C., Wan, L. and Hrg, D. Dealing with wandering: a case study on caregivers' attitudes towards privacy and autonomy when reflecting the use of LBS In Proc. GROUP 2010, ACM, New York, NY, USA, Sanibel, Florida, 2010, 75--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Orpwood, R., Bjørneby, S., Hagen, I., Mäki, O., Faulkner, R. and Topo, P. User Involvement in Dementia Product Development. Dementia, 3 (3). 263--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Plastow, N. A. Is Big Brother Watching You? Responding to Tagging and Tracking in Dementia Care. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69 (11). 525--527.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Postman, N. Teaching as a Conserving Activity. New York: Dell, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Postman, N. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage Books, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Prince, M. and Jackson, J. World Alzheimer Report 2009. Alzheimer's Disease International, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson, L., Brittain, K., Lindsay, S., Jackson, D. and Olivier, P. Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) Project: Developing Assistive Technologies with People with Dementia and Their Carers to Promote Independence. International Psychogeriatrics, 21 (3). 494--502.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Robinson, L., Hutchings, D., Corner, L., Finch, T., Hughes, J., Brittain, K. and Bond, J. Balancing rights and risks: Conflicting perspectives in the management of wandering in dementia. Health, Risk & Society, 9 (4). 389--406.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsai, J. Y., Kelley, P., Drielsma, P., Cranor, L. F., Hong, J. and Sadeh, N. Who's viewed you?: the impact of feedback in a mobile location-sharing application. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2009, 2003--2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Welsh, S., Hassiotis, A., O'Mahoney, G. and Deahl, M. Big brother is watching you - the ethical implications of electronic surveillance measures in the elderly with dementia and in adults with learning difficulties. Aging & Mental Health, 7, (5). 372--375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Value biases of sensor-based assistive technology: case study of a GPS tracking system used in dementia care

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
          June 2012
          828 pages
          ISBN:9781450312103
          DOI:10.1145/2317956

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 June 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

          Upcoming Conference

          DIS '24
          Designing Interactive Systems Conference
          July 1 - 5, 2024
          IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader