skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208699acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social desirability bias and self-reports of motivation: a study of amazon mechanical turk in the US and India

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this study we extend research on online collaboration by examining motivation to do work on the crowdsoucing service Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). We address a challenge to many existing studies of motivation in online contexts: they are based on survey self-reports, which are susceptible to effects such as social desirability bias. In addition we investigate a second challenge to the extant research on motivation in the context of MTurk: a failure to examine potential differences between MTurk workers (Turkers) from different parts of the world, especially those from the US and India, MTurk's two largest worker groups. Using a survey technique called the list experiment, we observe distinct profiles of motivation and patterns of social desirability effects among Turkers in the US and India. Among US Turkers, we find that social desirability encourages over-reporting of each of four motivating factors we examined. The over-reporting was particularly large in the case of money as a motivator. In contrast, among Turkers in India we find a more complex pattern of social desirability effects, with workers under-reporting "killing time" and "fun" as motivations, and drastically over-reporting "sense of purpose." We conclude by discussing these results and proposing implications for future research and design.

References

  1. S. A. Adams, C. E. Matthews, C. B. Ebbeling, C. G. Moore, J. E. Cunningham, J. Fulton, and J. R. Hebert. The effect of social desirability and social approval on Self-Reports of physical activity. American Journal of Epidemiology, 161(4):389--398, Feb. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alexa.com. mturk.com - traffic details. http://alexa.com/siteinfo/mturk.com, Dec. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Buhrmester, T. Kwang, and S. D. Gosling. Amazon's mechanical turk. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1):3--5, Jan. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. Chandler and A. Kapelner. Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets. University of Chicago mimeo, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. J. DeMaio. Social desirability and survey measurement: A review. In C. F. Turner, E. Martin, and N. R. C. U. P. on Survey Measurement of Subjective Phenomena, editors, Surveying subjective Phenomena, volume 2, pages 257--282. Russell Sage Foundation, June 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Derné. Cultural conceptions of human motivation and their significance for culture theory. In D. Crane, editor, The Sociology of Culture: Emerging Theoretical Perspectives, pages 267--287. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D. C. Ganster, H. W. Hennessey, and F. Luthans. Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(2):321--331, June 1983. ArticleType: research-article / Full publication date: Jun., 1983 / Copyright 1983 Academy of Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. E. Goffman. The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, NY, NY, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. Gonzalez-Ocantos, C. K. de Jonge, C. Melndez, J. Osorio, and D. W. Nickerson. Vote buying and social desirability bias: Experimental evidence from nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science, Forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Ipeirotis. The new demographics of mechanical turk. http://behind-the-enemy-lines.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-demographics-of-mechanical-turk.html, Mar. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. L. Janus. The influence of social desirability pressures on expressed immigration attitudes*. Social Science Quarterly, 91(4):928--946, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. N. Kaufmann, D. Veit, and T. Schulze. More than fun and money. worker motivation in crowdsourcing a study on mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Detroit, MI, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Khanna, A. Ratan, J. Davis, and W. Thies. Evaluating and improving the usability of mechanical turk for low-income workers in india. In Proceedings of the First ACM Symposium on Computing for Development, ACM DEV '10, pages 12:1--12:10, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Kiesler, J. Siegel, and T. W. McGuire. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10):1123--1134, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. Kiesler and L. S. Sproull. Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(3):402--413, Sept. 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. F. King and G. C. Bruner. Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology and Marketing, 17(2):79--103, Feb. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A. Kittur, E. H. Chi, and B. Suh. Crowdsourcing user studies with mechanical turk. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 453--456, Florence, Italy, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. H. Kuklinski, M. D. Cobb, and M. Gilens. Racial attitudes and the "new south". The Journal of Politics, 59(2):323--349, May 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. K. R. Lakhani, R. G. Wolf, J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. R. Lakhani. Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in Free/Open source software projects. In Perspectives on Free and open Source Software. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. R. Markus and S. Kitayama. Culture, self, and the reality of the social. Psychological Inquiry, 14:277--283, Oct. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. W. Mason and D. J. Watts. Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds". SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11(2):100--108, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Meade, A. Watson, and C. Kroustalis. Assessing common methods bias in organizational research. In 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. K. Mieszkowski. "I make $1.45 a week and i love it". http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2006/07/24/turks/index_np.html, Sept. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. K. Mirchandani. Practices of global capital: Gaps, cracks and ironies in transnational call centres in india. Global Networks, 4(4):355--373, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. H. Moorman and P. M. Podsakoff. A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behavior research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2):131--149, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. B. Nardi, D. J. Schiano, M. Gumbrecht, and L. Swartz. Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12):41--46, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. A. J. Nederhof. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3):263--280, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. R. Nisbett and T. Wilson. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(1):231--259, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. O. Nov, M. Naaman, and C. Ye. Motivational, structural and tenure factors that impact online community photo sharing. In Third International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2009), San Jose, CA, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. D. L. Phillips and K. J. Clancy. Some effects of "social desirability" in survey studies. The American Journal of Sociology, 77(5):921--940, Mar. 1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. A. J. Quinn and B. B. Bederson. Human computation: A survey and taxonomy of a growing field. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. S. Rafaeli, D. R. Raban, and G. Ravid. How social motivation enhances economic activity and incentives in the google answers knowledge sharing market. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(1):1--11, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. J. Rogstadius, V. Kostakos, A. Kittur, B. Smus, J. Laredo, and M. Vukovic. An assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on task performance in crowdsourcing markets, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. J. Ross, L. Irani, M. S. Silberman, A. Zaldivar, and B. Tomlinson. Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 2863--2872, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. J. Schroer and G. Hertel. Voluntary engagement in an open Web-Based encyclopedia: Wikipedians and why they do it. Media Psychology, 12(1):96, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. J. Scott. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. A. Shaw, J. Horton, and D. Chen. Designing incentives for inexpert raters. In The 2011 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW, 2011), Hangzhou, China, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. S. Weber. The Success of Open Source. Harvard University Press, Apr. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. J. Zittrain. Ubiquitous human computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366:3813--3821, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Social desirability bias and self-reports of motivation: a study of amazon mechanical turk in the US and India

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader