skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037384acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Performing a check-in: emerging practices, norms and 'conflicts' in location-sharing using foursquare

Published:30 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Location-sharing services have a long history in research, but have only recently become available for consumers. Most popular commercial location-sharing services differ from previous research efforts in important ways: they use manual 'check-ins' to pair user location with semantically named venues rather than tracking; venues are visible to all users; location is shared with a potentially very large audience; and they employ incentives. By analysis of 20 in-depth interviews with foursquare users and 47 survey responses, we gained insight into emerging social practices surrounding location-sharing. We see a shift from privacy issues and data deluge, to more performative considerations in sharing one's location. We discuss performance aspects enabled by check-ins to public venues, and show emergent, but sometimes conflicting norms (not) to check-in.

References

  1. Barkhuus, L., Brown, B., Bell, M., Sherwood, S., Hall, M., Chalmers, M. From Awareness to Repartee: Sharing Location Within Social Groups. In Proc. CHI'08, ACM Press (2008), 497--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barkhuus, L. and Tashiro, J. Student socialization in the age of Facebook, In Proc CHI'10, ACM Press (2010), 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brown, B., Taylor, A., Izadi, S. et al. Locating family values: a field trial of the whereabouts clock, In Proc. UbiComp'07, ACM Press (2007), 354--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cheng, Z. Caverlee, J., Lee, K., Sui, D. Exploring Millions of Footprints in Location Sharing Services, In Proc. ICWSM'11 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Consolvo, S., Smith, I. E., Matthews, T., LaMarca, A. Tabert, J. and Powledge, P. Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share. In Proc. CHI'05, ACM Press (2005), 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cramer, H., Ahmet, Z., Rost, M. and Holmquist, L. E. Gamification & location-sharing: some emerging social conflicts. Gamification Workshop at CHI'11, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cranshaw, J., Yano, T. Seeing a home away from the home: Distilling proto-neighborhoods from incidental data with Latent Topic Modeling. NIPS'10, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalsgaard, P. and Koefoed Hansen, L. Performing perception---staging aesthetics of interaction. ACM Trans on Comp-Human Int 15, 3, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books (1959), New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Harper, R., Lemming, M. and Newman, W. Locating systems at work: implications for the design of Active Badge Applications. Interacting w. Computers, 4, 3 (1992), 343--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Iachello, G., Smith, I., Consolvo, S., Chen, M. and Abowd, G. Developing privacy guidelines for social location disclosure applications and services, In Proc. SOUPS'05, ACM Press (2005), 65--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., and Dey, A. K. Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In Proc. CHI'03, ACM Press (2003), 724--725. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lindqvist, J., Cranshaw, J., Wiese, J., Hong, H. and Zimmerman, J. I'm the Mayor of My House: Examining Why People Use foursquare, In Proc CHI'11, ACM Press (2011), 2409--2418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mashable.com, foursquare reaches 100 Million check-ins, http://t.co/B4anzsX, July 21, 2010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Marwick, A. and boyd, d. I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience. New Media & Society 13 (2011), 96--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Naaman, M., Boase, J. and Lai, C. Is it Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams. In Proc. CSCW'10, ACM Press (2010), 189--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Noulas, A Mascolo, C., Scellato, S., Pontil, M. An Empirical Study of Geographic User Activity Patterns in Foursquare, In Proc. ICWSM'11, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Page, X. and Kobsa, A. The Circles of Latitude: Adoption and Usage of Location Tracking in Online Social Networking. Computational Science & Engineering 4, IEEE (2009), 1027--1030. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C. and Fraser, M. Designing the spectator experience, In Proc. CHI'05, ACM Press (2005), 741--750 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Reilly, D., Dearman, D., Ha, V., Smith, I and Ikpen, K. Need to know: examining information need in location discourse, In Proc. Pervasive'06, LNCS (2006), 33--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sadeh, N., Hong, J., Cranor, L. Fette, I., Kelley, P., Prabaker, M. and Rao, J. Understanding and capturing people's privacy policies in a people finder application, J. Pers. & Ubiquitous Computing 13, 6 (2008), 401--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Scellato, S., Noulas, A., Lambiotte, R., Mascolo, C. Socio-spatial Properties of Online Location-based Social Networks, In Proc. ICWSM'11, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tang, K., Lin, J., Hong, J., Siewiorek, D. and Sadeh, N. Rethinking Location Sharing: Exploring the Implications of Social-Driven vs. Purpose-Driven Location Sharing, In Proc. UbiComp'10, ACM Press (2010), 85--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Toch, E., Cranshaw, J., Hankes-Drielsma, P., et al. Empirical Models of Privacy in Location Sharing, Proc. UbiComp'10, ACM Press (2010), 129--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wagner, D., Lopez, M., Doria, A., Pavlyshak, I., Kostakos, V., Oakley, I. and Spiliotopoulos, T. Hide and Seek: Location Sharing Practices With Social Media, Proc. MobileHCI'10 (2010), 55--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Performing a check-in: emerging practices, norms and 'conflicts' in location-sharing using foursquare

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      August 2011
      781 pages
      ISBN:9781450305419
      DOI:10.1145/2037373

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 August 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader