skip to main content
10.1145/1753846.1753890acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

HCI on the move: methods, culture, values

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

As HCI is taken up across different cultures, its methods have typically been presumed to be culturally universal. Though evidence suggests that they are not, dimensions of cultural specificities of HCI methods are not understood. Through detailed fieldwork with design practitioners in Delhi, India, I propose to develop a framework for understanding tacit material, cultural, and value commitments in HCI design methods, opening up possibilities for alternate conceptions of design.

References

  1. Appadurai, A. Modernity at Large. Univ. of Minnesota, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brewer, E. et al. The case for technology in developing regions. Computer 38, 6 (2005), 25--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chetty, M., Tucker, W., and Blake, E. Developing locally relevant software applications for rural areas: a South African example. Proc. SAICSIT 2004, ACM Press, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2004, 239--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Easterbrook, S.M. et al. A Survey of Empirical Studies of Conflict. CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict (1993), 1--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hofstede, G.& Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations. McGraw-Hill, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. IDEO. Design For Social Impact: How-To Guide. The Rockefeller Foundation, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Irani, L.C. and Dourish, P. Postcolonial Interculturality. Proc. IWIC 2009, ACM, Palo Alto, California, USA, 2009, 249--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Marcus, A. and Gould, E.W. Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design. interactions 7, 4 (2000), 32--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Marsden, G., Maunder, A., and Parker, M. People are people, but technology is not technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 366, 3795--3804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Oyugi, C., Dunckley, L., and Smith, A. Evaluation methods and cultural differences: studies across three continents. Proc. NordiCHI, ACM, Lund, Sweden, 2008, 318--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Pal, A. et al., "Telemedicine diffusion in a developing Country: The case of India," Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions, 9, 2005, 59--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Patel, N. et al. A comparative study of speech and dialed input voice interfaces in rural India. Proc. CHI 2009, 51--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Patel, N. Personal Communication. Sep. 11, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramachandran, D. et al. Social dynamics of early stage co-design in developing regions. Proc. CHI 2007, ACM, San Jose, California, USA, 2007, 1087--1096. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Winschiers, H. and Fendler, J., "Assumptions Considered Harmful," Usability and Internationalization. HCI and Culture, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Vatrapu, R. and M.A. Perez-Quinones, "Culture and Usability Evaluation: The Effects of Culture in Structured Interviews," Online International Journal of Usability Studies,v4, Aug 2006, 156--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Verran, H. "Transferring Strategies of Land Management: Indigenous Land Owners and Environmental Scientists," Research in Science and Technology Studies', Knowledge and Society, M. de Laet, ed., Oxford: Elsevier & JAI Press, 2002, 155--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman, B., Kahn, P., and Bourning, A. Value centered design in information systems. P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations. NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. HCI on the move: methods, culture, values

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2219 pages
      ISBN:9781605589305
      DOI:10.1145/1753846

      Copyright © 2010 Copyright is held by the author/owner(s)

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '10 Paper Acceptance Rate350of1,346submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader