Brian Dorn
Mark Guzdial
ABSTRACT
This paper reports on a study of professional web designers and developers. We provide a detailed characterization of their knowledge of fundamental programming concepts elicited through card sorting. Additionally, we present qualitative findings regarding their motivation to learn new concepts and the learning strategies they employ. We find a high level of recognition of basic concepts, but we identify a number of concepts that they do not fully understand, consider difficult to learn, and use infrequently. We also note that their learning process is motivated by work projects and often follows a pattern of trial and error. We conclude with implications for end-user programming researchers.
- L. Beckwith, C. Kissinger, M. Burnett, S. Wiedenbeck, J. Lawrance, A. Blackwell, and C. Cook. Tinkering and gender in end--user programmers' debugging. In Proceedings of CHI '06, pages 231--240, 2006. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. F. Blackwell. First steps in programming: a rationale for attention investment models. In Proceedings of HCC '02, pages 2--10, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Brandt, P. J. Guo, J. Lewenstein, M. Dontcheva, and S. R. Klemmer. Two studies of opportunistic programming: interleaving web foraging, learning, and writing code. In Proceedings of CHI '09, pages 1589--1598, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Braun and V. Clarke. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Pyschology, 3(2):77--101, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Dorn, A. E. Tew, and M. Guzdial. Introductory computing construct use in an end--user programming community. In Proceedings of VL/HCC '07, pages 27--30, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Du Boulay. Some difficulties of learning to program. In E. Soloway and J. Spohrer, editors, Studying the Novice Programmer, pages 283--299. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989.Google Scholar
- M. Felleisen, R. B. Findler, M. Flatt, and S. Krishnamurthi. The TeachScheme! project: Computing and programming for every student. Computer Science Education, 14(1):55--77, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Fincher and J. Tenenberg. Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Systems, 22(3):89--93, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. R. G. Green and S. J. Payne. Organization and learnability in computer languages. International Journal of Man--Machine Studies, 21:7--18, 1984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. G. Greeno, A. M. Collins, and L. B. Resnick. Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee, editors, Handbook of educational psychology, pages 15--46. Simon and Schuster Macmillan, New York, NY, 1996.Google Scholar
- M. Guzdial and C. Kehoe. Apprenticeship--based learning environments: A principled approach to providing software--realized scaffolding through hypermedia. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9(3/4):289--336, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Horstmann. Big Java. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2nd edition, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Katsanos, N. Tselios, and N. Avouris. Autocardsorter: designing the information architecture of a web site using latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of CHI '08, pages 875--878, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. J. Ko, B. A. Myers, and H. H. Aung. Six learning barriers in end--user programming systems. In Proceedings of VL/HCC '04, pages 199--206, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Lave, M. Murtaugh, and O. de la Rocha. The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff and J. Lave, editors, Everyday Cognition, pages 67--94. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984.Google Scholar
- G. Leshed, E. M. Haber, T. Matthews, and T. Lau. Coscripter: automating & sharing how--to knowledge in the enterprise. In Proceedings of CHI '08, pages 1719--1728, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Lewandowski, A. Gutschow, R. McCartney, K. Sanders, and D. Shinners--Kennedy. What novice programmers don't know. In Proceedings of ICER '05, pages 1--12, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Lewis and W. Loftus. Java Software Solutions (Java 5.0 version): Foundations of Program Design. Addison Wesley, Boston, MA, 4th edition, 2005.Google Scholar
- H. Lieberman, editor. Your Wish is My Command: Programming by Example. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Lieberman, F. Paterno, and V. Wulf, editors. End User Development. Springer, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Little and R. C. Miller. Translating keyword commands into executable code. In Proceedings of UIST '06, pages 135--144, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. B. McKeithen, J. S. Reitman, H. H. Rueter, and S. C. Hirtle. Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers. Cognitive Psychology, 13:307--325, 1981.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. F. Pane, C. Ratanamahatana, and B. A. Myers. Studying the language and structure in non--programmers' solutions to programming problems. International Journal of Human--Computer Studies, 54:237--264, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Rogoff and J. Lave, editors. Everyday Cognition. toExcel, New York, NY, 1999.Google Scholar
- M. B. Rosson, J. Ballin, and J. Rode. Who, what, and how: A survey of informal and professional web developers. In Proceedings of VL/HCC '05, pages 199--206, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W.-M. Roth. Mathematical inscriptions and the reflexive elaboration of understanding: An ethnography of graphing and numeracy in a fish hatchery. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2):75--110, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Rugg and P. McGeorge. The sorting techniques: a tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert Systems, 14(2):80--93, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Rugg and M. Petre. A gentle guide to research methods. Open University Press, Berkshire, UK, 2007.Google Scholar
- K. Sanders, S. Fincher, D. Bouvier, G. Lewandowski, B. Morrison, L. Murphy, M. Petre, B. Richards, J. Tenenberg, L. Thomas, R. Anderson, R. Anderson, S. Fitzgerald, A. Gutschow, S. Haller, R. Lister, R. McCauley, J. McTaggart, C. Prasad, T. Scott, D. Shinners--Kennedy, S. Westbrook, and C. Zander. A multi--institutional, multinational study of programming concepts using card sort data. Expert Systems, 22(3):121--128, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Scaffidi, M. Shaw, and B. Myers. Estimating the numbers of end users and end user programmers. In Proceedings of VL/HCC '05, pages 207--214, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Soloway, M. Guzdial, and K. E. Hay. Learner--centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2):36--48, April 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Spohrer and E. Soloway. Putting it all together is hard for novice programmers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, November 1985.Google Scholar
- S. Turkle and S. Papert. Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. In I. Harel and S. Papert, editors, Constructionism: Research reports and essays, 1985--1990, pages 161--192. Ablex, Norwood, N.J., 1991.Google Scholar
- A. Wilson, M. Burnett, L. Beckwith, O. Granatir, L. Casburn, C. Cook, M. Durham, and G. Rothermel. Harnessing curiosity to increase correctness in end--user programming. In Proceedings of CHI '03, pages 305--312, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. M. Wing. Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3):33--35, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. M. Zelle. Python Programming: An Introduction to Computer Science. Franklin Beedle, Wilsonville, OR, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Learning on the job: characterizing the programming knowledge and learning strategies of web designers
Recommendations
The Gaming Involvement and Informal Learning Framework
Aim. This article presents a model of how gaming involvement and informal learning come together in practice.
Method. Based on a series of interviews, case studies, and a wider survey, the Gaming Involvement and Informal Learning (GIIL) framework ...
Exploring the Meaning of Mobile Learning for Informal Learning: Preliminary and Exploratory Study
This study defines mobile technology specifically in this study, smart phone technology as a contemporary learning tool and environment that can make a difference in users' informal learning practice. Currently, in Korea, there are thirteen millions ...
OK Google, Let's Learn: Using Voice User Interfaces for Informal Self-Regulated Learning of Health Topics among Younger and Older Adults
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper, we present Health Buddy, a voice agent integrated into commercially available Voice User Interfaces (VUIs) to support informal self-regulated learning (SRL) of health-related topics through multiple learning strategies and examine the ...
Comments