skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753349acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Independence and interaction: understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

As America's baby boom population gets older, aging in place -- the idea that seniors can remain independent in a comfortable home environment while being monitored and receiving care from family and caregivers living elsewhere -- has received significant attention. Fostering a sense of independence while simultaneously enabling monitoring and frequent interaction can seem paradoxical, however. This raises questions of how we can design technologies that help seniors retain their independence and a sense of comfort, while still interacting with and being monitored regularly by others. We present results from an interview study of 30 seniors, caregivers and relatives in which we sought to understand how they managed their interactions, availability, privacy and independence. Results suggest that they rely on attributes of the physical environment, temporal structures such as routine conversations and activities, and technological mediation.

References

  1. Begole, J., Matsakis, N. and Tang, J. Lilsys: Inferring Unavailability Using Sensors. In ACM CSCW (2004), 511--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Birnholtz, J., Gutwin, C. and Hawkey, K. Privacy in the open: how attention mediates awareness and privacy in open-plan offices In ACM GROUP (2007), 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Boyle, M. and Greenberg, S. The Language of Privacy: Learning from Video Media Space Analysis and Design. TOCHI, 12, 2 (2005), 328--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bureau, U.C. American Community Survey. Retrieved from: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STTable?bm=y&-geo_id=01000US&qr_name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_S0101&-ds_name=ACS_2007_3YR_G00_Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Celler, B.G., Earnshaw, W., Ilsar, E.D., Betbeder-Matibet, L., Harris, M.F., Clark, R., Hesketh, T. and Lovell, N.H. Remote monitoring of health status of the elderly at home. A multidisciplinary project on aging at the University of New South Wales. International Journal of Biomedical Computing, 40, 2 (1995), 147--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cohen, M.D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, L., Marengo, M., Warglien, M. and Winter, S. Contemporary issues in research on routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 3 (1996), 653--698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Consolvo, S., Roessler, P. and Shelton, B.E. The CareNet Display: Lessons Learned from an In Home Evaluation of an Ambient Display In Proc. UbiComp (2004), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dabbish, L. and Kraut, R. Controlling Interruptions: Awareness displays and social motivation for coordination. In ACM CSCW (2004), 182--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K., Skubic, M. and Rantz, M. Senior residents' perceived need of and preferences for "smart home" sensor technologies. Intl. J. of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24, 1 (2008), 120--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Demiris, G., Parker, O.D., Hensel, B.K., Dickey, G., Rantz, M. and Skubic, M. Use of videophones to enrich the distant caregiving experience for family members of long term care facility residents. J. of Gerontological Nursing (in Press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dey, A. and De Guzman, E.S. From awareness to connectedness: the design and deployment of presence displays. In ACM CHI(2006), 899--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dourish, P. and Bly, S. Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In ACM CHI (1992), 541--547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Duck, S. Steady as (s)he goes: relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In D. Canary and L. Stafford, ed. Communication and Relational Maintenance. Academic Press, New York, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W.A. Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems that Mesh with Social Processes. TOCHI, 7, 1 (2000), 59--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fogarty, J., Au, C. and Hudson, S. Sensing from the Basement: A Feasibility Study of Unobtrusive and Low-Cost Home Activity Recognition In ACM UIST (2006), 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fogarty, J., Hudson, S.E., Atkeson, C.G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J.C. and Yang, J. Predicting Human Interruptibility with Sensors, TOCHI 12, 1 (2005), 119--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hudson, S.E. and Smith, I. Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems. In ACM CSCW (1996), 248--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Marek, K.D. and Rantz, M.J. Aging in place: a new model for long term care. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 43, 2 (2000), 81--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. McEwan, G. and Greenberg, S. Supporting social worlds with the community bar. In ACM GROUP (2005), 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Melenhorst, A.S., Rogers, W.A. and Caylor, E. The use of communication technologies by older adults: exploring the benefits from the user's perspective. In Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2001), 221--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mihailidis, A., Carmichael, B. and Boger, J. The Use of Computer Vision in an Intelligent Environment to Support Aging-in-Place, Safety, and Independence in the Home. IEEE Transactions On Information Technology In Biomedicine, 8, 3 (2004), 238--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mynatt, E.D., Essa, I. and Rogers, W.A. Increasing the opportunities for aging in place. In ACM Universal Usability (2000), 65--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mynatt, E.D., Rowan, J., Craighill, S. and Jacobs, A. Digital family portraits: providing peace of mind for extended family members. In ACM CHI (2001), 333--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Neustaedter, C., Bernheim-Brush, A.J. and Greenberg, S. 'The Calendar is Crucial': Coordination and awareness through the family calendar. TOCHI, 6, 1 (2009), 6--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Neustaedter, C., Greenberg, S. and Boyle, M. Blur filtration fails to preserve privacy for home-based video conferencing. ACM TOCHI, 13, 1 (2006), 1--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Newell, A.F. and Gregor, P. Design for older and disabled people -- where do we go from here? Universal Access Information Society, 2(2002), 3--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Perry, M., Dowdall, A., Lines, L. and Hone, K. Multimodal and Ubiquitous Computing Systems: Supporting Independent-Living Older Users. IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine, 8, 3 (2004), 258--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pinquart, M. and Sorensen, S. Influences on loneliness in older adults: A meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(2001), 245--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Rogers, W.A. and Mynatt, E.D. How can technology contribute to the quality of life of older adults? In M.E. Mitchell, ed. The technology of humanity: can technology contribute to the quality of life? Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Romero, N., Markopoulos, P., van Baren, J., de Ruyter, B., IJsselsteij, W. and Farshchian, B. Connecting the family with awareness systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(2007), 299--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rubinstein, R.L., Lubben, J.E. and Mintzer, J.E. Social isolation and social support: an applied perspective. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 13, 1 (1994), 58--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Sixsmith, A., Hine, N., Neild, I., Clarke, N., Brown, S. and Garner, P. Monitoring the well-being of older people. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 23, 1 (2007), 9--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Tang, J. Approaching and leave-Taking: Negotiating Contact in Computer-Mediated Communication. TOCHI, 14, 1 (2007), 1--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Independence and interaction: understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2010
        2690 pages
        ISBN:9781605589299
        DOI:10.1145/1753326

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader