skip to main content
research-article

Sexism: toxic to women's persistence in CSE doctoral programs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 March 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Using longitudinal survey data from women in the CRA-W Graduate Cohort program, we measured the prevalence of observed or experienced sexism and its impact on departure from Computer Science and Computer Engineering (CSE) doctoral programs. Our data suggest that sexist behavior is perceived less often by these women than it is by women in general. In addition, few of the women who observe sexism are motivated by it to think of leaving their CSE doctoral programs. Nevertheless, when their reason for thinking of leaving is due to sexism they observed or experienced, the odds of women actually departing are at least 21 times greater than if they thought of leaving for any other reason.

References

  1. Antecol, H., Cobb-Clark, D. (2006) The sexual harassment of female active-duty personnel: Effects on job satisfaction and intentions to remain in the military. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Vol. 61. P. 55--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Berg, S. H. (2006) Everyday Sexism and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Women: A Correlational Study. Violence Against Women. 12, P 970--988Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferreira, M. M. (2002) Context factors related to women's attrition from a graduate science program: A case study. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 12(1). P 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Foley, S. Ngo, H. Loi, R. (2006) Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Personal Gender Discrimination: A Study of Solicitors in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, Vol. 55. P. 197--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fox, M. F. (1989). Women and higher education: Gender differences in the status of students and scholars. Women: A Feminist Perspective, P. 217--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox, M. F. (2001). Women, Science, & Academia: Graduate education and careers. Gender & Society, 15(5), P. 654--666.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gruber, J. E. (1998) The Impact of Male Work Environments and Organizational Policies on Women's Experiences of Sexual Harassment. Gender and Society. Vol. 12(3). P. 301--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hinze, S. W. (2004) "'Am I Being Over-Sensitive?' Women's Experience of Sexual Harassment During Medical Training" Health. Vol. 8. P. 101--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Laband, D. N., Lentz, B. F., (1998). The effects of sexual harassment on job satisfaction, earnings, and turnover among female lawyers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 51, P. 594--607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Leaper, C. & Brown, C. S. (2008) Perceived Experiences with Sexism Among Adolescent Girls. Child Development, 79(3) P. 685--704.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lord, H. (2007). The Role of Advising in Women's Retention in CSE Departments. Presentation at the second workshop from CRA on Graduate Women's Recruitment & Retention. Seattle WA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McIlwee, J. S., and Robinson, J. G. Women in engineering: gender, power, and workplace culture. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M, Stewart, A. J. Malley, J. (2007) Voice Matters: Buffering The Impact of a Negative Climate for Women in Science. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 31. P. 270--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Swim, J., Hyers, L., Cohen, L., Ferguson, M. Everyday Sexism: Evidence for Its Incidence, Nature, and Psychological Impact from Three Daily Diary Studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1) P. 31--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Sexism: toxic to women's persistence in CSE doctoral programs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
      ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 41, Issue 1
      SIGCSE '09
      March 2009
      553 pages
      ISSN:0097-8418
      DOI:10.1145/1539024
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      • cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '09: Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
        March 2009
        612 pages
        ISBN:9781605581835
        DOI:10.1145/1508865

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 March 2009

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader