skip to main content
10.1145/1517744.1517747acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Smart metering demand management programs: challenging the comfort and cleanliness habitus of households

Published:08 December 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, field and capital, this paper outlines how smart metering demand management programs could be redesigned to bring together the competing fields of resource management and domestic life. Comfort and cleanliness expectations, which are ingrained in the habitus of householders and the field of domestic life, are often overlooked in demand management programs, which focus instead on making existing and evolving expectations more efficient. This paper draws on preliminary findings from qualitative research activities with householders who received consumption feedback through an in-home display, and/or variable price signals --- both enabled by smart meters. The paper offers insights for designers of interactive demand management strategies about how to go beyond achieving efficiency benefits in the home in order to fundamentally change expectations and norms ingrained in the habitus.

References

  1. Ackermann, M. (2002) Cool comfort: America's romance with air-conditioning, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington {USA}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Agbemabiese, L., Berko, K Jr. & du Pont, P. (1996) 'Air conditioning in the tropics: cool comfort of cultural conditioning?' Paper presented to 1996 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Human Dimensions of Energy Consumption, Washington {USA}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Akrich, M. (1992) 'The de-scription of technical objects', in WE Bijker & J Law (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA {US}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Arroyo, E., Bonanni, L. & Selker, T. (2005) 'Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink', paper presented to CHI 2005, Portland, Oregon {USA}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bourdieu, P. (2005) 'Habitus', in J Hillier & E Rooksby (eds), Habitus: a sense of place, 2nd edn, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Hants {England}, pp. 43--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Polity Press, Cambridge {UK}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chappells, H. & Shove, E. (2005) 'Debating the future of comfort: environmental sustainability, energy consumption and the indoor environment', Building Research and Information, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 32--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chetty, M., Tran, D. & Grinter, R. E. (2008) 'Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home', paper presented to UbiComp'08, Seoul {Korea}, September 21--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cialdini, R. (2003) 'Crafting normative messages to protect the environment', Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 105--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Darby, S. (2006) The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford {England}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. EES (2006) Status of air conditioners in Australia - updated with 2005 data, Energy Efficient Strategies prepared for the National Appliance and Equipment Energy Efficiency Committee (NAEEEC), Canberra, ACT {Australia}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein, N. & Cialdini, R. (2007) 'Using social norms as a lever of social influence', in AR Pratkanis (ed.), The science of social influence: advances and future progress, Psychology Press, New York {US}, pp. 167--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gram-Hanssen, K. (2007) 'Teenage consumption of cleanliness: how to make it sustainable?' Sustainability: science, practice & policy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Harper, P. (2006) Australia's environment issues and trends 2006, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, ACT {Australia}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Integral (2007) Dynamic and Seasonal Peak Pricing Trial, Integral Energy, Western Sydney, 4 June.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Intille, S. S. (2002) 'Designing a home of the future', Pervasive Computing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 76--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jelsma, J. (2006) 'Designing 'moralized' products: theory and practice', in P-P Verbeek & A Slob (eds), User behavior and technology development: shaping sustainable relations between consumers and technologies, Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 221--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaufmann, C. (1998) Dirty Linen: couples and their laundry, Middlesex University Press, London {UK}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lockwood, M. & Murray, R. (2005) RED Future Currents: Designing for a changing climate (work in progress), Design Council, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Marvin, S., Chappells, H. & Guy, S. (1999) 'Pathways of smart metering development: shaping environmental innovation', Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 23, pp. 109--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. MCE (2008) Cost-Benefit Analysis Options for a National Smart Meter Roll-Out (Phase Two - Regional and Detailed Analyses), Standing Committee of Officials of the Ministerial Council on Energy (MCE), Canberra {ACT}, Regulatory Impact Statement, available from: www.mce.gov.au.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mozer, MC (1998) 'The neural network house: an environment that adapts to its inhabitants', in M Coen (ed.), Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium on Intelligent Environments, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 110--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. NEMMCO (2007) Australia's national electricity market: statement of opportunities 2007, National Electricity Market Management Company (NEMMCO), available from: www.nemmco.com.au.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. NERA (2007) Cost benefit analysis of smart metering and direct load control: Phase 1 overview report, NERA Economic Consulting for the Ministerial Council on Energy Smart Meter Working Group, Sydney {Australia}, September.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. NERA (2008a) Cost benefit analysis of smart metering and direct load control. Work stream 4: consumer impacts. Phase 2 consultation report, NERA Economic Consulting for the Ministerial Council on Energy Smart Meter Working Group, Sydney {Australia}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. NERA (2008b) Cost benefit analysis of smart metering and direct load control: overview report for consultation, NERA Economic Consulting for the Ministerial Council on Energy Smart Meter Working Group, Sydney {Australia}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. OECD (2002) Towards sustainable household consumption? Trends and policies in OECD countries, Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Pears, A. (2007) 'Imagining Australia's energy services futures', Futures, vol. 39, pp. 253--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Randolph, B. & Troy, P. (2008) 'Attitudes to conservation and water consumption', Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 11, pp. 441--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Robinson, L. & Glanznig, A. (2003) Enabling EcoAction: a handbook for anyone working with the public on conservation, Human Society International, WWF Australia, World Conservation Union, Sydney.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Schultz, W., Nolan, J., Cialdini, R., Goldstein, N. & Griskevicius, V. (2007) 'The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms', Psychological Science, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 429--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Schwartz Cowan, R. (1989) More work for mother: the ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave, Free Association Books, London {England}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Shipworth, M. (2000) Motivating home energy action: a handbook of what works, Australian Greenhouse Office.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Shove, E. (2003) Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the social organisation of normality, Berg Publishers, Oxford {UK}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Shove, E. (2004) 'Efficiency and consumption: technology and practice', Energy & Environment, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1053--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sofoulis, Z. (2005) 'Big water, everyday water: a sociotechnical perspective', Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 445--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Sofoulis, Z., Allon, F., Campbell, M., Attwater, R. & Velayutham, S. (2005) Everyday water: values, practices, interactions: a UWS research partnerships project: final report, University of Western Sydney presented to Delfin Lend Lease, Sydney {Australia}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sterne, J 2003, 'Bourdieu, technique and technology', Cultural Studies, vol. 17, no. 3/4, pp. 367--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Strain, J. (2003) 'Households as morally ordered communities: explorations in the dynamics of domestic life', in R Harper (ed.), Inside the smart home, Springer-Verlag London Limited, London, pp. 41--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Strang, V. (2004) The meaning of water, Berg, Oxford {UK}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Takayama, C. & Lehdonvirta, V. (2008) 'Ecoisland: a system for persuading users to reduce CO2 emissions', paper presented to Green Pervasive Workshop at Pervasive Persuasive 2008, Sydney, NSW, 19 May.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilhite, H. & Lutzenhiser, L. (1999) 'Social loading and sustainable consumption', Advances in consumer research, vol. 26, pp. 281--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilhite, H., Nakagami, H., Masuda, T., Yamaga, Y. & Haneda, H. (1996a) 'A cross-cultural analysis of household energy use behaviour in Japan and Norway', Energy Policy, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 795--803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Wilhite, H., Nakagami, H. & Murakoshi, C. (1996b) 'The dynamics of changing Japanese energy consumption patterns and their implications for sustainable consumption', paper presented to 1996 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Human Dimensions of Energy Consumption, Washington {USA}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Smart metering demand management programs: challenging the comfort and cleanliness habitus of households

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader