skip to main content
10.1145/1457199.1457212acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting group relationships in mediated domestic environments

Published:07 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

As everyday Internet use has become pervasive and natural, people use it effortlessly to find new acquaintances and nurture existing relationships. In this sense, Internet use can mimic and expand everyday social behavior from real life. However, in real life we often participate in gatherings with others not only as individuals but also as part of a group, for instance a family. Social gatherings involving several groups reinforces not only the individual network, but also the group-to-group relationships, adding another layer to social life. Our social identities, our "us"-feelings, are thus developed and enhanced. While there are numerous Internet-based tools and services for nurturing the individual's network, in analogy to real life, group-level interactions are barely touched upon. We explore some basic considerations for how computer-mediated communication systems could help nurturing group-to-group relationships, and how group, rather than individual, interaction with devices can be addressed in interaction design. Finally, we explore why games and gameplay might particularly well suited to motivate use of such systems. These issues will be the main focus of the TA2 (Together Anywhere, Together Anytime) research project.

References

  1. Agamanolis, S. (2006). Beyond Communication: Human Connectedness as a Research Agenda, in Purcell, P. (Ed.), Networked Neighbourhoods: The Connected Community in Context. Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Battarbee, K. (2003). Defining Co-Experience. In Proceedings of DPPI'03, pp. 109--113. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Battarbee, K. and Koskinen, I. (2005). Co-experience: user experience as interaction. CoDesign, Vol 1. No. 1, pp. 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Baecker, R., Harrison, S., Buxton, B., Poltrock, S., and Churchill, E. (2008). Media spaces: past visions, current realities, future promise. In CHI '08 Extended Abstracts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Björk, S., Peitz, J., Holopainen, J. and Ljungstrand, P. (2007). Socially Adaptable Games - From Pirates! to Insectopia. In Magerkurth, C. & Rööcker, C. (Eds.) Pervasive Gaming Applications - A Reader for Pervasive Gaming Research, vol. 2. Shaker Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bly, S., Harrison, S., & Irwin, S. (1993). Media Spaces: Bringing People Together in a Video, Audio, and Computing Environment. Communications of the ACM 36, 1, pp. 28--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. Jossey-Bass, Inc. Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Depaula, R. (2003). A New Era in Human Computer Interaction: The Challenges of Technology as a Social Proxy. In Proceedings of Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction, pp. 219--222. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Eriksson, D., Björk, S. and Peitz, J. (2005). Socially Adaptable Games. In Proceedings of DIGRA 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., and Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, pp. 510--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, C. (1998). Design for Individuals, Design for Groups. Tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. In Proceedings of CSCW'98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hogg, M. and Vaughan, G. (2005) Social Psychology, 4th Ed. Pearson Education Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hård af Segerstad, Y. & Ljungstrand, P. (2002). Instant messaging with WebWho. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 56, pp. 147--171. Elsevier Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kavanaugh, A., Zin, T., Rosson, M. and Carroll, J. (2006). The Impact of the Internet on Local and Distant Social Ties., in Purcell, P. (Ed.), Networked Neighbourhoods: The Connected Community in Context. Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Linderoth, J. (2004) Datorspelandets mening: Bortom idén om den interaktiva illusionen. Ph.D. dissertation (in Swedish). Göteborg university.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ludvigsen, M. (2006). Designing for Social Interaction. Ph.D. dissertation, Aarhus University, Denmark. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mueller, F., Agamanolis, S. and Picard, R. (2003). Exertion Interfaces: Sports over a Distance for Social Bonding and Fun, Proceedings of CHI 2003, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Shiels, M. (2008). The power of play on the internet. BBC News, 25 April 2008. Available online at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7361924.stmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sjöblom, B. (2008). The Relevance of Rules: Negotiations and Accounts in Co-operative and Co-located Computer Gaming. Proceedings of the {player} conference, IT University of Copenhagen, pp. 335--378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Weilenmann, A., and Larsson, C. (2001). Local Use and Sharing of Mobile Phones. In B. Brown, N. Green & R. Harper (Eds.) Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age. Springer-Verlag, pp. 99--115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wellman, B. (2001). Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Networked Individualism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 227--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Wellman, B. et al. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Vol. 8, No. 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Wellman, B. (2005). Community: from neighborhood to network. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 48, No. 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Whitty, M., and Carr, A. (2003). Cyberspace as potential space: Considering the Web as a playground to cyberflirt. Human Relations, Vol. 56, No. 7, pp. 868--891.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Supporting group relationships in mediated domestic environments

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            MindTrek '08: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Entertainment and media in the ubiquitous era
            October 2008
            221 pages
            ISBN:9781605581972
            DOI:10.1145/1457199

            Copyright © 2008 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 October 2008

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader