skip to main content
10.1145/1413634.1413705acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdimeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobile video stories

Published:10 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The aim of this article is to test how different narrative structures work in mobile video storytelling applications for creative arts. Especially, we are interested in stories made with the mobile phone and for the mobile phone i.e. they are supposed to be viewed on the mobile phone. In addition, we present a new mobile social video service and demo platform MoViE that enables users to create mobile narrations and stories using narrative structures. Hypothesis is that it is possible to create a dramaturgically intensive and coherent story from various short mobile videos composed by several authors if only there is a story generator that composes the certain structure and order to the combination of mobile videos. User of a mobile phone with video camera works as an author, and several authors could produce a common narrative with one storyline that is composed by automatic story generator. In the empirical part of the article we apply a narrative structure based on jazz music as a matrix for the story generator and analyze the creation process of video clips. In this study, we use ethnomethodology as our research framework.

References

  1. Bal, M. 1997. Narratology, Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Second edition. University of the Toronto Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Berruti, M. 2005. Approaches to Narratology, lectures held in the University of Helsinki.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Eisenstein, S. M. 1964. Izbrannye proizvedenija v 6-I tomah. T.2 Moskva, Isskustvo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Garfinkel H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Greimas, A. J. 1999. A. J. Greimasin luennot Helsingissä 4.- 5.5.1979. Semiotiikan julkaisuja 1.Translated to Finnish and edited by Eero Tarasti. Yliopistopaino. (in Finnish)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Huttunen, T. 1997. Montaasi ja teksti. Synteesi, 4/1997, 58--79. (in Finnish)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jokela T., Karukka M., and Mäkelä K. 2007. Mobile Video Editor: Design and Evaluation. In J. Jacko (ed.): Human-Computer Interaction, Part II, HCI 2008, LNCS 4551, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 344--353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kaptelinin V., and Nardi B. A. 2006. Acting with Technology. Activity Theory and Interaction Design. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Klastrup L. 2007. Telling & Sharing? Understanding Mobile Stories & Future of Narratives. pertDAC 2007 The Future of Digital Media Culture. 7th International Digital Arts and Culture Conference, Perth, Australia 15--18th September.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Koskinen I. K. 2007. Mobile Multimedia in Action. Transactions Publishers, New Brunswick, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Okabe D., and Ito M. 2004. Camera phones changing the definition of picture-worthy. Japan Media Review. Annenberg School for Communication, USC, http://ojr.org/japan/wireless/1062208524.php {11.05.2008}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lotman, J. M. 1989. Merkkien maailma. Kirjoitelmia semiotiikasta. Suomentaneet Erkki Peuranen, Paula Nieminen ja Jukka Mallinen. SN-kirjat, Helsinki (in Finnish)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Propp V. 1928. Morfolgija skazki, Moskva.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Propp V. 1998. Morphology of the folktale. Translated by Laurence Scott. 14. edition. University of Texas Press (First English edition 1968)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Reponen E., Huuskonen P., and Mihalic K. 2008. Primary and secondary context in mobile video communication. Pers Ubiquit Comput, 12:281--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rimmon-Kenan, S. 1983. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poeticts, Methuen London and New York.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Rimmon-Kenan, S. 1999. Kertomuksen poetiikka. Suom. Auli Viikari. SKS (in Finnish)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Van House, N., and Davis M. 2005. The Social Life of Cameraphone Images. In Proceedings of the Pervasive Image Capture and Sharing: New Social Practices and Implications for Technology Workshop (PICS 2005) at the Seventh International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mobile video stories

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DIMEA '08: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts
          September 2008
          551 pages
          ISBN:9781605582481
          DOI:10.1145/1413634

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 September 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          DIMEA '08 Paper Acceptance Rate59of77submissions,77%Overall Acceptance Rate59of77submissions,77%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader