skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357144acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Competence articulation: alignment of competences and responsibilities in synchronous telemedical collaboration

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many studies and concepts within CSCW deal with the temporal, spatial, social, and computational aspects of supporting collaborative work. In this paper we want to pay attention to another central aspect to the achievement of collaborative work, namely the competence of the people involved. In particular, we want to look at the dynamic quality of competences, and investigate how competence is mutually developed in coordinated work. We have termed this process competence articulation, a concept which tries to emphasize competence as well as social development of competence as part of cooperation. The concept has emerged out of a longitudinal participatory design process investigating telemedical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers using video phones. We analyze the transitions occurring with the introduction of synchronous telemedical consultations and detail how the online video facilitates communication options for competence articulation, which again improve collaboration and thus the quality of the treatment.

References

  1. Ackerman MS, Pipek V, Wulf V. Sharing Expertise. London: MIT Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker C, Emmison M, Firth A. Calibrating for competence in calls to technical support. In Baker C, ed. Calling for Help. Language and social interaction in telephone helplines, pp 39--62. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bardram J,.Bossen C. Mobility Work: The spatial Dimensiom of Collaboration at a Hospital. Comput.Supported Coop.Work 2005;14:131--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bardram, Jakob E., Bossen, Claus, and Thomsen, Anders. Designing for transformations in collaboration: a study of the deployment of homecare technology. 294--303. 2005. New York, NY, USA, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bardram, Jakob E. and Hansen, Thomas R. The AWARE architecture: supporting context-mediated social awareness in mobile cooperation. 192--201. 2004. Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW04). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bloomgarden ZT. American Diabetes Association 60th Scientific Sessions, 2000: the diabetic foot. Diabetes Care 2001;24:946--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bossen, Claus. The parameters of common information spaces:: the heterogeneity of cooperative work at a hospital ward. 176--185. 2002. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Carstensen, Peter H. and Nielsen, Morten. Characterizing modes of coordination: a comparison between oral and artifact based coordination. 81--90. 2001. ACM Press. GROUP '01: Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Clark HH, Schreuder R, Buttrick S. Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1983;22:245--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Clemensen, J, Larsen, S. B., Kirkevold, M., and Ejskjær, N. Telemedical teamwork between home and hospital: A synergetic triangle emerges. 2007. IOS Press. Proceedings of the Third International Conference Information Technology in Health Care.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen D, Prusak L. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Consolvo S, Roessler P, Shelton BE, LaMarca A, Schilit B, Bly S. Technology for Care Networks of Elders. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2004;22--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cyert RM, March JG. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitzpatrick G. Emergent Expertise Sharing in a New Community. In Ackerman MS, Pipek V, Wulf V, eds. Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management, pp 81--106. MIT Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Heath, Christian and Luff, Paul. Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multi-media office environment. 99--103. 1991. ACM Press. CHI '91: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jensen, C., Farnham, S. D., Drucker, S. M., and Kollock, P. The effect of communication modality on cooperation in online environments. 470--477. 2000. The Hague, The Netherlands, ACM Press. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Koch S. Home telehealth-current state and future trends. Int.J Med Inform. 2006;75:565--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Larsen SB, Clemensen J, Ejskjær N. A feasibility study of UMTS mobile phones for supporting nurses doing home visits to patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2006;12:358--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nardi, BA, Schwarz, H, Kuchinsky, A, Leichner, R, Whittaker, S, and Sclabassi, R. Turning away from talking heads: the use of video-as-data in neurosurgery. 327--334. 1993. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ACM Press. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pinelle, David and Gutwin, Carl. Designing for loose coupling in mobile groups. 75--84. 2003. New York, NY, USA, ACM Press. Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM conference on supporting group work. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Schmidt K,.Bannon L. Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal 1992;1:7--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C. Social Organization of Medical Work. The University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tomlinson P. Can competence profiling work for effective teacher preparation? part i: general issues. Oxford Review of Education 1995;21:179--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wiberg M,.Whittaker S. Managing availability: Supporting lightweight negotiations to handle interruptions. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 2005;12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Competence articulation: alignment of competences and responsibilities in synchronous telemedical collaboration

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2008
            1870 pages
            ISBN:9781605580111
            DOI:10.1145/1357054

            Copyright © 2008 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 April 2008

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader