skip to main content
10.1145/1324892.1324899acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How probes work

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 November 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

'Cultural probes', since first being proposed and described by Bill Gaver and his colleagues, have been adapted and appropriated for a range of purposes within a variety of technology projects. In this paper we critically review different uses of Probes and discuss common aspects of different Probe variants. We also present and critique some of the debate around Probes through describing the detail of their use in two studies: The Digital Care Project (Lancaster University) and The Mediating Intimacy Project (University of Melbourne). We then reorient the discussion around Probes towards how probes work: both as interpretative fodder for social scientists and as a resource for 'designers'. Finally we discuss new possible directions for Probes as an approach and some of the challenges confronting Probes as an approach.

References

  1. Boehner. K, Vertesi, J, Sengers, P & Dourish P. How HCI interprets the Probes. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press, New York, 1077--1086, Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brown, B. A. T., Sellen A. J. and O'Hara K. P. A diary study of information capture in working life. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press, New York, 438--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cheverst, K. Cobb, S., Hemmings, T, Kember, S., Mitchell, K., Phillips, P., Procter, R., Rodden T. and Rouncefield, M. Design with care. Journal of New Technology in the Human Services, 14, 1 (2001), 39--47Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheverst, K., Fitton, D., Rouncefield, M. & Graham, C. 'Smart Mobs' and Technology Probes: Evaluating Texting at Work. In Proc. ECITE 2004, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, 73--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheverst, K., Dix, A., Fitton, D., Rouncefeld, M., and Graham, C. Exploring Awareness Related Messaging through Two Situated Display based Systems. Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 1 (2007), 173--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Crabtree, A. Designing Collaborative Systems: A Practical Guide to Ethnography, Springer-Verlag, London, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., Hughes, J., Rouncefield, M., (2003b). Designing With Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings. In Proc. OzCHI 2004, 4--13. Brisbane, Australia: Ergonomics Society of AustraliaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Garfinkel, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaver, W. and Dunne, A. (1999a). Projected Realities: Conceptual Design for Cultural Effect. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press, New York, 600--607 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gaver, W., Dunne, A., Pacenti, E., Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions: New Visions of Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 1, (1999b), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gaver, W. H., Hooker, B. and Dunne, A. The Presence Project, Department of Interaction Design, London, 1999c.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaver, W. Designing for ludic aspects of everyday life. ERCIM News, No.47. Available from:http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim_News/enw47/gaver. html, (2001)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaver, W. Designing for Homo Ludens. 13 Magazine 12 (June 2002)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., and Walker, B (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions: New Visions of Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 5, (2004), 53--56 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gibbs, M., Vetere, F., Howard, S., and Bunyan, M. (2005) SynchroMate: A Phatic Technology for Mediating Intimacy. In Proc. DUX 2005, AIGA, New York, 37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Graham, C, Cheverst K, Fitton D, & Rouncefield M. "How Do You Turn A Duck Into A Soul Singer? Put It In The Microwave Until Its Bill Withers": Some social features of a simple technology. In Proc. of the Less Is More Conference 2005, Microsoft, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Grudin, J. Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In Proc. CSCW 1988, ACM Press, New York, 85--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Horst, W., Bunt, T., Wensveen, S., and Cherian, L. (2004). Designing Probes for Empathy with Families. In Proc. of Dutch Directions in HCI 2004, ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., Andersen, H. (1994). Moving out of the control room: ethnography in system design. In Proc. CSCW 1994, ACM Press, New York, 429--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hulkko, S., Mattelmäki, T.; Virtanen, K. and Keinonen, T., Mobile Probes. In Proc. NordiCHI 2004, ACM Press: Tampere, Finland. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B, Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N. and Eiderbäck, B. Technology probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press, New York, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kjeldskov, J., Gibbs, M., Vetere, F., Howard, S., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., Bunyan, M. 2005, Using Cultural Probes to Explore Mediated Intimacy. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 1 (2005), 102--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Löwgren, J. (1995). Applying design methodology to software development. In Proc. DIS 1995, ACM Press, New York, 87--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mattelmäki, T. & Battarbee, K. Empathy Probes. In Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2002, CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, 266--271Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mayo, E. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, New York: MacMillan, 1933.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Paulos, E. and Jenkins, T. Urban probes: encountering our emerging urban atmospheres. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press, New York, 341--350 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Plummer, K. Documents of Life. George Allen & Unwin, London, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Plummer, K. Documents of Life 2: An Invitation to a Critical Humanism, Sage Publications, London, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sacks, H. A single instance of a phone-call opening. In Jefferson, G. (ed) Lectures on Conversation Volume II. Blackwell, Oxford, 1992, 542--553.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Schutz, A. The Phenomenology of the Social World Northwestern University Press: Evanston, Illinois, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharrock, W. and Anderson, R. On The Demise of the Native: Some Observations on and a Proposal for Ethnography. Human Studies (5), (1982), 119--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Shelley, M. Frankenstein. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Slack, R. S. Reflexivity or Sociological Practice: A Reply to May. Sociological Research Online, 5, 1 (2000). Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/1/slack.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Vetere, F., Martin R. Gibbs, Kjeldskov, J., Howard S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., and Bunyan, M. Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press, New York, 471--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs, M., Francis, P., and Howard, S. A Magic Box for Understanding Intergenerational Play. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press, New York, 1475--1480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Vetting Wolf, T., Rode, J. A., Sussman, J. and Kellogg, W. A. (2006). Dispelling Design as the 'Black Art'. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press, New York, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishing, 1953/2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How probes work

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OZCHI '07: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces
      November 2007
      323 pages
      ISBN:9781595938725
      DOI:10.1145/1324892

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 November 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      OZCHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate26of42submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader