skip to main content
10.1145/1254960.1254971acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Performative roles of materiality for collective creativity

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper seeks to develop a better understanding of the contribution of materiality for creativity in collaborative settings, exploring the ways in which it provides resources for persuasive, narrative and experiential interactions. Based on extensive field studies of architectural design workplaces and on examples from art works, we show: how the variety of material features expands communicative resources and provide border resources for action, in their peripheral, evocative, and referential function; how spatiality supports the public availability of artefacts as well as people's direct, bodily engagement with materiality; and finally how materiality is part of performative action, looking at temporal frames of relevance and emergence in specific events. We conclude with implications for the development of novel interface technologies.

References

  1. Brown, S. and P. Duguid (1994) Borderline Resources: Social and Material Aspects of Design. HCI 9(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Csikszentmihalyi, M., (1997) Creativity : Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, Harper Collins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dewey, J., (1980/1934) Art as Experience, Perigee Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dourish, P. Where the Action is: the Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Finnengan, R. Communicating: The Multiple Modes of Human Interconnection, Routledge, London, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fredrickson, L. Vision and Material Practice: Vladimir Tatlin and the Design of Everyday Objects. Design Issues 15(1), 1999, 49--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Goldschmidt, G. The dialectics of sketching. Design Studies 4, 1991, 123--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldschmidt, G. On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies 15(2), 1994, 158--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Heath, C. and P. Luff Documents and Professional Practice: 'Bad' Organizational Reasons for 'Good' Clinical Records. CSCW'96, Boston MA, 354--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Henderson, K. The visual culture of engineers. The cultures of computing. S. Star. Blackwell,1995 197--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hogue, M. The Site as project lessons from land and conceptual art. J. of Architectural Education, 2004 54--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hornecker, E., Buur, J. Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction. CHI 2006, ACM Press, pp. 437--446 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hughes, J., D. Randall, Shapiro, D. Faltering from Ethnography to Design. CSCW _92, Toronto: 115--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Iwamoto, L. Embodied Fabrication: computer--aided spacemaking. In: Fabrication: examining the digital practice of architecture Eds, Beesley, P, Cheng, NY--W and Williamson, RS, ACADIA, 2004, 269--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacucci, G. Interaction as Performance. Cases of Configuring Physical Interfaces in Mixed Media. Academic Dissertation. Oulu, University of Oulu, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Koestler, A. The Act of Creation, NY: Macmillan, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuutti, K., Iacucci, G, Iacucci, C. Acting to Know: Improving Creativity in the Design of Mobile Services by Using Performances. In: Creativity & Cognition2002, ACM Press, Pp. 95--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lawson, B. Schemata, Gambits and Precedent: Some Factors in design Expertise. Design Studies 25, 2004 443 -- 457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Michaud, P.-A. Aby Warburg and the Image in Motion. New York, 2004, Zone Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mori, T., Immaterial/Ultramaterial. Architecture, Design, and Materials, 2004, Harvard Design School/George Braziller Publ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., Ohira, M., A Framework that Supports Collective Creativity in Design using Visual Images, Creativity & Cognition 1999, NY, 1999, 166--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ormerod, F., Ivanic R. Materiality in Children's Meaning--Making Practices. Visual Communication 1(1), 2002, 65--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Perry, M. Coordinating Joint Design Work: the Role of Communication and Artefacts. Design Studies 19, 1998, 273--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Purcell, A. T. and J. S. Gero Drawings and the Design Process. Design Studies 19, 1998, 389--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Robertson, T. The Public Availability of Actions and Artefacts, CSCW 11, 2002, 299--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rodaway, P. Sensuous Geographies. Body, Sense and Place. London, New York, 2002 Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rogan, B. Artefacts -- Source Material or Research Objects in Contemporary Ethnology? Ethnologia Scandinavica 22, 1992, 105 -- 117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson, R. Hackett, J.P. Creating the conditions for creativity. Design Management Journal. 8(4), 1997, 10--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sawyer, R., K., The interdisciplinary study of creativity in Performance, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1998, 11--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Schmatz, F. Büro exemplarisch, verdichtet. Work & Culture -- Büüro. Eine Inszenierung von Arbeit. H. Lachmayer and E. Louis. Ritter Verlag, 1998, 191--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt, K. and I. Wagner Coordinative artefacts in architectural practice. COOP 2002. Saint--Raphael, IOS Press, 2002, 257--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmidt, K. and I. Wagner Ordering systems. Coordinative practices and artefacts in architectural design and planning. CSCW, 13, 2005, 349--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals think in practice Ashgate, Aldershot, 1991Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Smolucha, F. A Reconstruction of Vygotsky's theory of creativity Creativity Research Vol 5 (1) 1991, 49--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Turner V. From Ritual to Theatre: the Human Seriousness of Play, PAJ Publications 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Verbeek, P.-P. and P. Kockelkoren The Things That Matter. Design Issues 14(3), 1998, 28--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Warnier, J.-P. A Praxeological Approach to Subjectivation in a Material World. Journal of Material Culture 6(1), 2001, 5 -- 24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Ward, T. B., Finke, R. A., and Smith, S. M. Creativity and The Mind. 1995, NY: PlenumGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Performative roles of materiality for collective creativity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '07: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition
      June 2007
      330 pages
      ISBN:9781595937124
      DOI:10.1145/1254960

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader