Brian Kelly
David Sloan
Stephen Brown
ABSTRACT
The work of the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) is described in a set of technical guidelines designed to maximise accessibility to digital resources. Further activities continue to focus on technical developments, with current discussions exploring the potential merits of use of Semantic Web and Web 2.0 approaches. In this paper we argue that the focus on technologies can be counter-productive. Rather than seeking to enhance accessibility through technical innovations, the authors argue that the priority should be for a user-focussed approach, which embeds best practices through the development of achievable policies and processes and which includes all stakeholders in the process of maximising accessibility.
The paper reviews previous work in this area and summarises criticisms of WAI's approach. The paper further develops a tangram model which describes a pluralistic, as opposed to a universal, approach to Web accessibility, which encourages creativity and diversity in developing accessible services. Such diversity will need to reflect the context of usage, including the aims of a service (informational, educational, cultural, etc.), the users' and the services providers' environment.
The paper describes a stakeholder approach to embedding best practices, which recognises that organisations will encounter difficulties in developing sustainable approaches by addressing only the needs of the end user and the Web developer. The paper describes work which has informed the ideas in this paper and plan for further work, including an approach to advocacy and education which coins the "Accessibility 2.0" term to describe a renewed approach to accessibility, which builds on previous work but prioritises the importance of the user. The paper concludes by describing the implications of the ideas described in this paper for WAI and for accessibility practitioner stakeholders.
- Accessibility of resources in institutional repositories, Digital Repositories mailing List, December 2006. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A1=ind0612&L=jisc-repositoriesGoogle Scholar
- ALERT. (2005) Guidelines on using VLEs with disabled students. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.dur.ac.uk/alert/guidelines/pdf/alert_allVLEguidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Alexander, D. (2003) How accessible are Australian University Web Sites? AusWeb03. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw03/papers/alexander3/Google Scholar
- Australian Vice Chancellor's Committee. (2004) Guidelines on Information Access for students with print disabilities. Retrieved April 10th 2007:http://www.avcc.edu.au/content.asp?page=/publications/policy/statements/Google Scholar
- BSI (2005) PAS 78: Guide to good practice in commissioning accessible websites. BSI.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. (1990) Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Carey K. (2005) Accessibility: The Current Situation and New Directions. Ariadne 44, June 2005. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue44/carey/Google Scholar
- Chancellor's Office California Community Colleges. (1999) Distance education: access guidelines for students with disabilities. Retrieved April 9th 2007, http://www.htctu.net/publications/guidelines/distance_ed/distedguidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Chisholm W. and Henry S. (2005) Interdependent components of Web accessibility. Proceedings of W4A at WWW2005: International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark J. (2006) To Hell with WCAG 2. A List Apart No. 217 Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2Google Scholar
- Clark, J. (2007) Letter to Tim Berners-Lee: Time to cancel WCAG 2.0 Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://joeclark.org/access/webaccess/WCAG/TBL/Google Scholar
- Department of Health and Human Services (2006) Research-based Web design and Usability Guidelines. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.usability.gov/pdfs/guidelines.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Disability Rights Commission. (2004) The Web: access and inclusion for disabled people. London: TSO.Google Scholar
- Henry, S. L. (2006) Introduction to Web accessibility. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.phpGoogle Scholar
- IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2004b) IMS Guidelines for Developing Accessible Learning Applications. Version 1.0 White Paper. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility#accguideGoogle Scholar
- Kelly B., Sloan D., Phipps L., Petrie H. and Hamilton F. (2005) Forcing standardization or accommodating diversity? A framework for applying the WCAG in the real world. Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A) (, Japan, 10 May 2005). New York:ACM Press. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/papers/w4a-2005/ Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelly, B., Phipps, L. and Swift, E. (2004) Developing A Holistic Approach for E-Learning Accessibility. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 2004, Vol. 30, Issue 3. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/papers/cjtl-2004/Google Scholar
- Kelly, B. and Brown, S. (2007) Professional Forum: Accessibility 2.0: A Holistic And User-Centred Approach To Web Accessibility, Museums and the Web 2007. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http:/www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/conferences/mw-2007/professional-forum/Google Scholar
- National Institute on Aging (2002) Older adults and information technology: A compendium of scientific research and web site accessibility guidelines. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. (1994) Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Pearson, E. J. and Koppi, T. (2001) Inclusion and online learning opportunities: designing for accessibility. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 10, 2, 17--28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Petrie, H., King, N. and Hamilton, F. (2005) Accessibility of museum, library and archive websites: the MLA audit. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.mla.gov.uk/website/policy/Diversity/Web_AccessibilityGoogle Scholar
- Petrie, H. and Kheir, O. (2007) The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. CHI 2007 ProceedingsGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Pickard J. (2006) Whistle stop WCAG 2.0: To Hell … and back. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200608/whistlestop-wcag-2-to-hell-and-back/Google Scholar
- Powell, N., Moore, D., Gray, J., Finlay, J. and Reaney, J. (2004) Dyslexia and learning programming, Italics, 13, 2, Retreived April 9th 2007: http://www.ics.Itsn.ac.uk/pub/italics/Vo13-2/dyslexia.pdf Google ScholarDigital Library
- Public Sector Needs Better Guidance On Web Accessibility, E-Government Bulletin (Issue 226, 13 November 2006) Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/meetings/accessibility-summit-2006-11/Google Scholar
- Rainger, P. (2003) A dyslexic perspective on e-content accessibility. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.techdis.ac.uk/index.php?p=2_2_1_2_3Google Scholar
- Raymond E. (1998) The Cathedral and the Bazaar, First Monday. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_3/raymond/Google Scholar
- Response to WCAG 2.0, [email protected] list. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2006Jun/0174.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Seale, J., E-learning and disability in higher education: accessibility research and practice. Routledge London.Google Scholar
- Seale, J., A contextualised model of accessible e-learning practice in higher education institutions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, (2), 268--288.Google Scholar
- Seeman L. Formal objection explained. W3C WCAG 2.0 Public Comments list. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2006Jun/0119Google Scholar
- Sloan D., Kelly B., Heath A., Petrie H., Hamilton F. and Phipps L. (2006) Contextual Accessibility: Maximizing the Benefit of Accessibility Guidelines. Proceedings of the 2006 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A) (Edinburgh, Scotland, 23 May 2006). New York: ACM Press, 121--131. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/papers/w4a-2006/ Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sloan D. (2006) Two cultures? The disconnect between the Web standards movement and research based Web design guidelines for older people. Gerontechnology Journal 5(2) (July 2006) 106--112.Google Scholar
- Sloan D., Dickinson A., McIlroy N. and Gibson L. (2006) Evaluating the Usability of Online Accessibility Information. Final Project Report. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.techdis.ac.uk/index.php?p=3_10_10_1Google Scholar
- Spindler, T. (2004) The accessibility of web pages for midsized college and university libraries, Reference & User Services Quarterly, 42, 2, 149--154.Google Scholar
- The Plain English Campaign. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/Google Scholar
- UK Web Focus (2007) Scribd - Doing For Documents What Slideshare Does For Presentations, March 29th 2007. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/Google Scholar
- W3C (1999) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/Google Scholar
- W3C (2000) Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. February 2000. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS/Google Scholar
- W3C (2002) User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. December 2002. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/Google Scholar
- W3C (2005) Web Accessibility Initiative. Policies relating to Web accessibility. Retrieved April 10th 2007: http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/Google Scholar
- W3C (2006) Web Accessibility Initiative WCAG 2.0 FAQ. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/wcag2faq.html#doneGoogle Scholar
- W3C (2006) Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG). 23 March 2006. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Google Scholar
- W3C (2006) Why Standards Harmonization is Essential to Web Accessibility, W3C. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/HarmonGoogle Scholar
- W3C (2007) Education & Outreach Working Group (EOWG). 30 March 2007. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Google Scholar
- WCAG Samurai. Retrieved April 9th 2007: http://www.wcagsamurai.org/Google Scholar
- Witt, N. A. J. and McDermott, A. P. (2002) Achieving SENDA-compliance for Web Sites in further and higher education: an art or a science? in L. Phipps., A. Sutherland and J. Seale (eds). Access all areas: disability, technology and learning. pp. 42--49 Oxford: ALT/TechDis.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Accessibility 2.0: people, policies and processes
Recommendations
Contextual web accessibility - maximizing the benefit of accessibility guidelines
W4A '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility (W4A): Building the mobile web: rediscovering accessibility?We argue that while work to optimize the accessibility of the World Wide Web through the publication and dissemination of a range of guidelines is of great importance, there is also the need for a more holistic approach to maximizing the role of the Web ...
One world, one web ... but great diversity
W4A '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A)The mantra "One World, One Web" has a strong appeal to Web developers. They think of it as a design philosophy based on use of internationally agreed open standards for providing universal access to networked resources and services available on the ...
Interdependent components of web accessibility
W4A '05: Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A)Increasingly, the Web is providing unprecedented access to information and interaction for people with disabilities. However, the Web will not be equally accessible, allowing people with disabilities to access and contribute to the Web, until:• ...
Comments