skip to main content
10.1145/1166253.1166282acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Personalizing routes

Published:15 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Navigation services (e.g., in-car navigation systems and online mapping sites) compute routes between two locations to help users navigate. However, these routes may direct users along an unfamiliar path when a familiar path exists, or, conversely, may include redundant information that the user already knows. These overly complicated directions increase the cognitive load of the user, which may lead to a dangerous driving environment. Since the level of detail is user specific and depends on their familiarity with a region, routes need to be personalized. We have developed a system, called MyRoute, that reduces route complexity by creating user specific routes based on a priori knowledge of familiar routes and landmarks. MyRoute works by compressing well known steps into a single contextualized step and rerouting users along familiar routes.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

1166282.mp4

mp4

55.2 MB

References

  1. Maneesh Agrawala and Chris Stolte. Rendering effective route maps: Improving usability through generalization. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, pages 241--250, August 2001. ISBN 1-58113-292-1.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jorg Baus, Antonio Kruger, and Wolfgang Wahlster. A resource-adaptive mobile navigation system. In Proceedings of IUI '02, pages 15--22, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G E Burnett, D Smith, and A J May. Supporting the navigation task: Characteristics of 'good' landmarks. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society, Contemporary Ergonomics 2001, pages 441--446, April, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreas Butz, J Baus, Antonio Kruger, and Marco Lohse. A hybrid indoor navigation system. In Proceedings of IUI '01, pages 25--32, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Krzysztof Gajos and Daniel S. Weld. Preference elicitation for interface optimization. In UIST '05: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 173--182, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. iCrossing. How america searches. Technical report, http://www.icrossing.com/rdm/article_1-1.html, June 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Privilege Insurance and YouGov. Unsafe use of navigation equipment. Technical report, http://www.privilege.com/aboutus/Unsafeusenavigation.htm, Febuary 2006.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alexander Klippel, Heike Tappe, and Christopher Habel. Pictorial representations of routes: Chunking route segments during comprehension. In Spatial Cognition III, pages 11--33. Springer; Berlin, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Paul U. Lee, Heike Tappe, and Alexander Klippel. Acquisition of landmark knowledge from static and dynamic presentation of route maps. KI Special Issue Spatial Cognition, 02(4):32--34, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin Liao, Dieter Fox, and Henry A. Kautz. Learning and inferring transportation routines. In Deborah L. McGuinness and George Ferguson, editors, Proceedings of AAAI, pages 348--353, San Jose, CA, 2004. AAAI Press The MIT Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Clemens Nothegger, Stephan Winter, and Martin Raubal. Selection of salient features for route directions. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 4(2):113--136, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. A. Pettit and G. E. Burnett. Defining driver distraction. In Proceedings of World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Barbara Tversky and Paul U. Lee. Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In COSIT '99: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, pages 51--64, London, UK, 1999. SpringerVerlag.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Personalizing routes

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '06: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2006
      354 pages
      ISBN:1595933131
      DOI:10.1145/1166253

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader