skip to main content
10.1145/1099203.1099228acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Design decisions in the RideNow project

Published:06 November 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

The RideNow Project is designed to help individuals within a group or organization coordinate ad hoc shared rides. This paper describes three design decisions the RideNow team made in order to allow incremental adoption and evolution and to capitalize on local conditions. (1) The system allows users to interact with the system through email or Web, because we anticipate that email will be most convenient when there are few users but the Web interface will be more useful as the number of users increase. (2) The system does not force structure on user-entered data such as dates, times, and locations, instead allowing conventions to emerge. (3) We use the group's shared physical spaces to provide additional information about ride sharing activity.

References

  1. M. S. Ackerman. The intellectual challenge of cscw: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2/3):179--203, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. G. Fichman and S. A. Moses. An incremental process for software implementation. Sloan Management Review, 40(2):39--52, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Grudin. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. 37(1):92--105, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Malone, K. R. Grant, K.-Y. Lai, R. Rao, and D. Rosenblitt. Semi-structured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 5(2):115--131, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. L. Moreland and J. M. Levine. Socialization in organizations and work groups. In M. E. Turner, editor, Groups at work: Theory and research, pages 69--112. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Shirky. Situated software, Mar. 2004. available at http://www.shirky.com/writings/situated software.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). Highlights of the 2001 national household travel survey, 2001. available at: http://www.bts.gov/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). Omnibus survey household survey results, Oct. 2004. Available at http://www.bts.gov.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design decisions in the RideNow project

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GROUP '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
        November 2005
        368 pages
        ISBN:1595932232
        DOI:10.1145/1099203

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 November 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader